Skip to main content

Incensed by KWeberLit's diary entry regarding pharmacists seeking the right to refuse to dispense birth control, I started looking into the origins of Pharmacists for Life.

Media Matters has an interesting piece on the organization's president, Karen Brauer.

She was fired from a Kmart pharmacy, but not solely for not dispensing birth control.  She lied to the patient, telling her that the pharmacy did not carry that drug.

Pharmacists for Life is founded by an individual who has willingly violated the code of ethics for pharmacists.  

III.A pharmacist respects the autonomy and dignity of each patient.

IV.A pharmacist acts with honesty and integrity in professional relationships.

These individuals seek to add clauses to the code of ethics which leave them free to disregard their professional responsibilities.

I have no qualms with a pharmacist who chooses not to prescribe medications that they find to be morally questionable.  However, these pharmacists should find employment in religious hospitals and pharmacies where patients expect spiritual judgement to play a role in the services rendered.

I'd be interested to assist in a letter writing campaign to top pharmacy chains to see what their stance is on consistency and quality of service when it comes to fulfilling contraceptive prescriptions.  Why wait for a blacklist?

That said, blacklist information can and should be collected as well.  I'm puzzling out how large of a role I wish to play in this, as a prescription birth control user.  

(seasonale rocks!)

Originally posted to faedrake on Sat Apr 09, 2005 at 10:43 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Possibility (none)
    of getting her license yanked?

    We should be playing hardball with these fuckheads.

    Just wait until the Drambuie and sleeping pills kick in.

    by MAJeff on Sat Apr 09, 2005 at 10:46:28 AM PDT

  •  I agree, why wait? (none)
    I wonder if there are any organizations that may have already started on this?  ACLU, NOW, Planned Parenthood??
  •  NARAL (none)
    http://prochoiceaction.org/ct/SpSVabM1pm5u/

    They have letters and petitions started. Go for it.

    •  Helpful hint. (none)
      If you send this email petition through NARAL, Walmart will reply almost immediately. I'm pretty sure they just set up an automated response and no one there is reading them. With Walmart at least, it may be better to send snail mail. You can just use the text that NARAL sends and personalize it for your own situation.

      Nukular and internets and strategery, oh my!

      by pattyp on Sat Apr 09, 2005 at 12:27:28 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  WaPo covered it in late March (none)
    It made page 1 too ... but was it above or below the fold?
  •  There's a contradiction going on here. (none)
    Either the diarist has "qualms" about pharmacists' rights to choose which prescriptions they fill or she doesn't. It is not viable for customers to have to guess in which pharmacies they can reasonably "expect spiritual judgement to play a role in the services rendered." Do you stay away from stores with "Mary" or "Spirit" in their name? What?

    The problem, as usual, is that only "Christians" are conceded to have "values" that matter in this country. As long as they can blubber about what "God" wants, they get audience and consideration, in contrast to anybody else basing their demands on the whispers of spooks and leprechauns.

    So either every pharmacist can fill prescriptions as dictated by whatever the state of their digestion, their, "faith", or the pills they've been sampling, or they all just fill the damn prescription. I guess my nephew, who's about to become an ER doc, then will not have to treat Ms Brauer and her kind, as prolonging her life would offend his personal "values". Sounds good to me.

  •  act directly (none)
    one of the farrightmacists who got in the stories was at an Osco in Chicago. All these stores/chains have websites. Send them an email:

    http://www.jewelosco.com/eCommerceWeb/AboutAlbertsonsAction.do?action=getContactUs

    I understand that your pharmacist in the Chicago area refused to fill prescriptions based on religious beliefs.  I will not shop at Albertson's or Jewel or Osco, nor will I xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx if you permit this policy in your stores. Furthermore, I will inquire as to local policies in your stores, and I will exercise my rights of freedom of speech and expression to inform other potential shoppers of your policies.

  •  What would happen if (none)
    a pharmacist refused to fill a prescription for pain medication because he or she believes that pain medication is mind altering and against their religion?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site