Skip to main content

(reprint of article by Mary Zanoni, Ph.D., contact info at the end)

Poultry fanciers and keepers of small flocks are facing a grave threat from a proposed government intrusion into their innocent choice of pastimes and way of life.
For several years, the USDA has been working with the largest-scale animal industry organizations (for example, the National Pork Producers, Monsanto Company, and Cargill Meat) to develop a mandatory "National Animal Identification System" ("NAIS").

However, most small scale livestock producers, people who raise animals for their own food, and people who keep horses or livestock as companion animals do not know about the USDA's plans.

The NAIS will drive small producers out of the market, will make people abandon raising animals for their own food, will invade Americans' personal privacy to a degree never before tolerated, will violate the religious freedom of Americans whose beliefs make it impossible for them to comply, and will erase the last vestiges of animal welfare from the production of animal foods.

The Problem

On April 25, 2005, the USDA released "Draft Program Standards" ("St.") and a "Draft Strategic Plan" ("Plan") concerning the NAIS.  If you think the description below sounds too bizarre to be true, please go here , read the Standards and Plan, and check the citations.
By January 1, 2008, the NAIS will be mandatory.  (Plan, pp. 2, 10, 17.)

Every person who owns even one horse, cow, pig, chicken, sheep, pigeon, or virtually any livestock animal, will be forced to register their home, including owner's name, address, and telephone number, and keyed to Global Positioning System coordinates for satellite monitoring, in a giant federal database under a 7-digit "premises ID number."  (St., pp. 3-4, 10-12; Plan, p. 5.)

Every animal will have to be assigned a 15-digit ID number, also to be kept in a giant federal database.  The form of ID will most likely be a tag or microchip containing a Radio Frequency Identification Device, designed to be read from a distance.  (Plan, p. 10; St., pp. 6, 12, 20, 27-28.)

The plan may also include collecting the DNA of every animal and/or a retinal scan of every animal.  (Plan, p.13.)

The owner will be required to report:  the birthdate of an animal, the application of every animal's ID tag, every time an animal leaves or enters the property, every time an animal loses a tag, every time a tag is replaced, the slaughter or death of an animal, or if any animal is missing.  Such events must be reported within 24 hours.  (St., pp. 12-13, 17-21.)

Third parties, such as veterinarians, will be required to report "sightings" of animals.  (St., p. 25.)  In other words, if you call a vet to your property to treat your horse, cow, or any other animal, and the vet finds any animal without the mandatory 15-digit computer-readable ID, the vet may be required to report you.

If you do not comply, the USDA will exercise "enforcement" against you.  (St., p. 7; Plan, p. 17.)  The USDA has not yet specified the nature of "enforcement," but presumably it will include imposing fines and/or seizing your animals.
There are no exceptions -- under the USDA plan, you will be forced to register and report even if you raise animals only for your own food or keep horses for draft or for transportation.

The Negative Effects

Eradication of Small Farms - People with just a few meat animals or 40-cow dairies are already living on the edge financially.  The USDA plan will force many of them to give up farming.

Loss of the True Security of Organic and Local Foods - The NAIS is touted by the USDA and agricorporations as a way to make our food supply "secure" against diseases or terrorism.  However, most people instinctively understand that real food security comes from raising food yourself or buying from a local farmer you actually know.  The USDA plan will only kill off more local sources of production and further promote the giant industrial methods which cause many food safety and disease problems.

Extreme Damage to Personal Privacy - Legally, livestock animals are a form of personal property.  It is unprecedented for the United States government to conduct large-scale computer-aided surveillance of its citizens simply because they own a common type of property.  (The only exceptions are registration of motor vehicles and guns, due to their clear inherent dangers - but they are registered at the state level, not by the federal government.)  The NAIS would actually subject the owner of a chicken to far more surveillance than the owner of a gun.  Surveillance of small-scale livestock owners is like the government subjecting people to surveillance for owning a couch, a TV, a lawnmower.  

What about non-livestock animals?  

Will the government next want to register all cats, dogs, and parakeets, and demand the global positioning coordinates of their owners' houses and apartments?

Insult to Animal Welfare - The NAIS is the ultimate objectification of higher, sensitive living creatures, treating individual animals as if they were cans of peas with a bar code.  Many people who raise their own animals or buy from small, local producers do so because they are very troubled by industrial-scale production of chickens, cattle, and pigs.  These people will be forced either to sacrifice their personal privacy to government surveillance, or to stop raising their own food by humane standards.

Burden on Religious Freedom - Many adherents of plain (and other) faiths raise their own food animals and use animals in farming and transportation because their beliefs require them to live this way.  Such people obviously cannot comply with the USDA's computerized, technology-dependent system.  The NAIS will force these people to violate their religious beliefs.

What You Can Do

Small-scale keepers of poultry and other livestock can take action to create an effective movement in opposition to the USDA/agricorporate plan.  First, small-scale livestock owners should not participate in any so-called "voluntary" state or federal program to register farms or animals.  The USDA is using farmers' supposed willingness to enter a "voluntary" program as a justification for making the program mandatory.  (See Plan, "Executive Summary" and pp. 7-8.)

Small farmers and livestock owners can also help inform and organize others.  The USDA presently does not plan to finalize its rules for mandatory ID until the summer of 2006.  There is still time to oppose this plan.
Several farmers and other concerned citizens have joined together to form FARM for LIFETM, a public-interest organization to support the rights of small and subsistence farmers and consumers of organic, natural, and local foods.  FARM for LIFE's first project is to stop the USDA plan for mandatory animal ID.

The organization will publish a newsletter three times a year (first publication scheduled for November 1, 2005), to inform citizens of developments concerning animal ID and other issues vital to the small farming and natural/organic food communities.  Newsletter subscribers will also be sent information at appropriate times on how to contact lawmakers and the USDA to oppose animal ID.  In addition, FARM for LIFETM will coordinate with other existing interest groups to mount an effective campaign against animal ID.
Please help STOP animal ID and support FARM for LIFETby subscribing to the newsletter: $25 Individual Subscription (1 year), $40 Institutional Subscription (1 year), Please help with an additional donation in any amount. Make your check payable to "Farm for Life" and mail to: Farm for Life, PO Box 501, Canton, New York 13617.
I have reprinted this article by:  

Mary Zanoni, Ph.D. (Cornell), J.D. (Yale), Executive Director of Farm for LifeTM
P.O. Box 501, Canton, New York 13617

Originally posted to herdsire on Sun Oct 16, 2005 at 09:12 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  post a tip jar... (none)

    This deserves to get recommendations and get on the front page.  

  •  this is HUGE (none)

    Keep a chicken, go to jail?  

    This hits anyone who intends to keep livestock for reasons of self-sufficiency, or use horses instead of tractors after peak oil when energy prices take off.  

    It's a direct assault on small-scale farming, organic agriculture, and any departure from corporate-scale factory farming.  

    You can be sure this will be touted as a way of dealing with avian flu and mad cow disease.  But it's BS in the worst way; there are better ways to deal with both.  

    This needs to be front-page news, now!

    •  This will = extinction of livestock (none)
      In studies of the factory-type varieties of turkeys, raised in farm-yard conditions, they all died, unable to survive outdoor, un-medicated conditions. This law will lead to the end of most, if not all, non-agribusiness breeds of poultry, beef, pork etc., a narrowing of the gene pool, and eventual death from some future 'avian flu'.

      I believe the EU has already outlawed growing non-patented vegetable varieties, if you can believe it. This takes 'global hegemony' to a whole new level. The ultimate 'dominionism.'

      •  EU outlawed nonpatented vegs...? (none)

        Your item about the EU outlawing growing non-patented vegetables would be huge if it's true; you need to provide a citation for that or some backup information so that claim can be verified.  

        I can't see anyone trying that kind of BS here, but one never knows...

        •  I meant non-registered; but same effect (none)
          Dominique Guillet and Association Kokopelli

          My original source for my assertion is not online. It is an article in 'Seed Savers Exchange 2004 Harvest Edition' titled 'Kokopelli in Europe', a transcript of a speech by Dominique Guillet given to the 2004 annual convention of the Seed Savers Exchange of which I am a member.

          "It is essential to note that everything that is eaten from the plate of a European citizen is registered in one of the National Vegetable Lists of the European Community. That is another way of saying that it is strictly against the law to grow, either for consumption or for seed production, a vegetable or cereal variety that has not been noted on one of these National Lists."

          The speech gave a history of 'Terre de Semences' the organization that he formed in 1994 to sell organic heirloom seeds, and how he was put out of business by the new EU regulations. He then goes on to describe his current work with 'Association Kokopelli'.

          "You do not realize that you still have so much freedom in this country [US]. You have no National List and anyone can sell or exchange or give seeds of whatever variety he wants, because there is no regulation to prevent it. In Europe each country has a National List, and you're not supposed to sell a variety of wheat, eggplant, tomato, whatever, for food or for seed if the variety is not registered on the National List."

          The 'same effect' is that F1 varieties will be patented and proprietary.

          This reminds me of the Monsanto 'killer gene'.

          •  let them just try... (none)

            I'll tell you this.  If they even so much as try that here, it's going to be down to the 2nd Amendment in certain rural areas.  And well that it should be.  

            •  I've printed this diary and the linked NAIS page (none)
              and I'm taking it around to all my neighbors here in the boonies. I live in a very 'red' area. We all have animals, guns and American spirit of independence. Hopefully this will add another nudge to help oust our (R) Senator and Rep. next year.
              •  I think that is going to be the way to go (none)
                There is startlingly little time, since this is all supposed to be mandatory by 2008.  There are still going to be some who have drunk so much of the kool aid that they will excuse it, but surely most will be appalled.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site