Daily Kos

Rosa Parks, Misremembered

Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 12:43:13 AM PDT

Rosa Parks died yesterday at age 92.  Over the days to come, we'll hear a lot of very-much deserved prasie for Parks' refusal to abide bigotry and her courage in the service of a cause.  Unfortunately, we'll also hear a new round of recitations of the stubborn myth that Parks was an anonymous, apolitical woman who spontaneously refused to yield to authority and in so doing inspired a movement.  The truth, as Aldon Morris wrote in his book The Origins of the Civil Rights Movement, is that a decade earlier
in the 1940s Mrs. Parks had refused several times to comply with segregation rules on the buses.  In the early 1940s Mrs. Parks was ejected from a bus for failing to comply.  The very same bus driver who ejected her that time was the one who had her arrested on December 1, 1955...She began serving as secretary for the local NAACP in 1943 and still held that post when arrested in 1955...In the early 1940s Mrs. Parks organized the local NAACP Youth Council...During the 1950s the youth in this organization attempted to borrow books from a white library.  They also took rides and sat in the front seats of segregated buses, then returned to the Youth Council to discuss their acts of defiance with Mrs. Parks.

This history is not hidden.  But the Times' obituary describes Parks' arrest nonetheless as an event which "turned a very private woman into a reluctant symbol and torchbearer..."  Parks was certainly reluctant to see too personal valoration of her as heroine distract from the broader movement.  But she was not private about her politics.  And her refusal to give up her bus seat was nothing new for her.  As she would later tell an interviewer, "My resistance to being mistreated on the buses and anywhere else was just a regular thing with me and not just that day."

The myth of Parks as a pre-political seamstress who was too physically worn out to move has such staying power not because there's any factual basis but because it appeals to an all-too popular narrative about how social change happens in America: When things get bad enough, an individual steps up alone, unsupported and unmediated, and spontaneously resists.  And then an equally spontaneous movement follows.  Such a myth makes good TV, but it's poor history.

Movement-building takes hard work, no matter how righteous the cause or how desperate the circumstances.

The pivotal moments of the 60's civil rights movement, as Morris recounts in his book, were not random stirrings or automatic responses.  Most of them were carefully planned events which followed months of organizing and were conceived with an eye to political tactics and media imagery.  There were even some long meetings involved.

That shouldn't  be seen as a dirty little secret, because strategic organizing and planned imagery shouldn't be seen as signs of moral impurity.  Organizations, like the people in them, each have their faults (Ella Baker was frequently and justifiably furious with the sexism and condescension of much of CORE's leadership).  But the choice of individuals to work together and find common cause in common challenges doesn't become less pure or less honest or less noble when they choose to do it through political organizations.  And there's nothing particularly progressive about a historical perspective in which Rosa Parks' defiance of racism is made less genuine by the knowledge that she was secretary of the NAACP.

The myth of Rosa Parks as a private apolitical seamstress, like the myth of Martin Luther King as a race-blind moderate, has real consequences as we face the urgent civil rights struggles of today.  Seeing acts of civil disobedience like Parks' as spontaneous responses to the enormity of the injustice justifies the all-too common impulses to refuse our support for organized acts of resistance and regard organized groups as inherently corrupt.  Those are impulses people like Rosa Parks had to confront and overcome amongst members of her community long before she ever made national headlines for refusing to give up her seat on the bus.

Josh

Tags: rosa parks, civil rights, media, organizing, strategy, race, hero, african americans, Clifford Durr, Virginia Durr, NAACP, Taylor Branch (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 154 comments

  •  Great diary. (4.00 / 15)

    I wish it wasn't so late when no one else will read it.
    •  not if we recommend it! (4.00 / 2)

      which I have done.  anyone else want to join me?

      Head to Heading Left, BlogTalkRadio's progressive radio site!

      by thereisnospoon on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 12:48:34 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  It was the first (4.00 / 2)

        thing I did.
        •  Also carpet bombing open thread (none / 0)

          with alerts. Already on rec list now, I see.

          What's so hard about Peace, Love, and Truth and Progress?

          by melvin on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 01:06:01 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  Highly Recommended : (4.00 / 7)

            The Rosa Parks mythology is horribly pernicious.  

            The mythology holds that oppressed people just "rise up" :

            Bullcrap. People get informed and organized. THEN, they rise up.

            •  Recommended (4.00 / 3)

              I've long wondered what (if anything) to do about the myth. King and the handful of other local Civil Rights leaders in Montgomery had looked for the right person for the Bus segregation challenge. Rosa was bombproof as to her personal reputation and mind set. And so it was planned. Rosa executed it all alone, but her support group was there by the time she arrived at the police station.

              Rosa was even greater, more determined, more self-controlled, than the myth

            •  That myth serves a purpose. (4.00 / 8)

              It leads people to believe that they can't make a difference.  Their actions don't matter.  They don't matter.

              You find these stories everywhere, not just Rosa Parks: it's always some especially good or moral or clever individual who triumphs through a perfect confluence of circumstances.

              Now, you take someone who isn't raised in an environment of activism and doesn't really know how to connect with other activists or build a network.  If they really feel strongly about social change, they might try to find such a moment for themselves - the one moment when some brave and noble action will tip everything and set a cascade of events in motion...

              But it never happens, because it doesn't work that way, and so what you wind up with is idealism turned to cynicism, people believing nothing they do or say can make a difference because they are not as good - or as lucky - as a Rosa Parks.

              And really what they need - they just don't know it - is community.

              How can we get over it when people died for the right to vote? -- John Lewis

              by furryjester on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 06:00:50 AM PDT

              [ Parent ]

              •  no I disagree strongly (4.00 / 2)

                "It leads people to believe that they can't make a difference.  Their actions don't matter.  They don't matter."

                but this is NOT the lesson that people take from Mrs. Parks... they take that one person standing up to power CAN make a difference.

                And I'm sure that was intentional on the part of the organizers.  After all, they didn't have a unified mass refusal to give up a seat

                •  No, I don't think so. (4.00 / 6)

                  Have you ever tried to be that tipping point? to take that one spontaneous action of the myth that suddenly causes this avalanche of change? I bought into the childhood stories and tried multiple times, as a child and young adult, and it never worked.  Well, DUH, because I wasn't part of a community of activists.  Reality is that one person working alone can do very little.  One person working with a community of activists can accomplish a great deal.  To cut the community of activists out of the myth cuts out every iota of the individual's REAL power.

                  How can we get over it when people died for the right to vote? -- John Lewis

                  by furryjester on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 08:53:59 AM PDT

                  [ Parent ]

      •  Recommended ... (none / 0)

        and I sent it to about 25 acquaintances to whom I believe it might have particular meaning.

        As someone who grew up in a family (very) active in the Civil Rights movement, I am embarassed (but glad) that I learned from this diary.

    •  It's made it well into EST daylight anyway (none / 0)

      Recommended, and top of the list this morning...

      "Civility costs nothing and buys everything." - Mary Wortley Montagu

      by sarac on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 05:45:17 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Another interesting, little reported fact... (4.00 / 9)

      ...that I read in the newspaper this morning- to say that Rosa refused to give up her seat so a white man could sit in it is not quite correct-

      In those days, busses in Montgomery had three sections- the first four rows were reserved for whites, blacks were in the back, and there was a middle section, where blacks could sit, until a white person wanted to sit in that section, when the blacks had to clear out.

      (Apparently, it was not enough to have blacks in back, whites in front- the folks in charge back then didn't want the blacks anywhere near the whites- when the front rows were filled with whites and a black man wanted to ride the bus, he would have to pay his fare up front, then step back out of the bus and walk back around to the back door of the bus to get on, so that he wouldn't walk past the whites seated in front!)

      Anyway, that day, the front section was full, and a white went to the middle section where four blacks were sitting. By the rules, they all had to leave and go to the back of the bus, even though only one seat was needed. Three of the four did so, but Rosa, the fourth, refused.

      So it wasn't just that she refused to give her seat to a white man, she refused to empty the section so a white man could sit in a section without blacks.

      •  Yet Another Little Known Fact (4.00 / 3)

        Mrs. Parks worked for another one of my heroes - John Conyers for some 20 years.  His district office in Detroit I think since that's where she lived for many years.

        She retired in 1988 after many years of service.

        •  and yet another one (none / 0)

          Rosa Parks was a member of CPUSA.

          "Murder, considered a crime when people commit it singly, is transformed into a virtue when they do it en masse." St. Cyprian (200-258)

          by valleycat on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 03:22:27 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  Where did you hear that? (none / 0)

            I've never seen or heard that before. Where did you get that from?
            •  I have my sources.... (none / 0)

              I work for the PWW, the newspaper for the CPUSA, though I am not a member. I heard it from a national chair member that I work with. She may not have released that information widely, therefore it's not the policy of the party to "out" her, nevertheless, it is true. There is some information available on the web about her associations with the Highlander group.

              "Murder, considered a crime when people commit it singly, is transformed into a virtue when they do it en masse." St. Cyprian (200-258)

              by valleycat on Wed Oct 26, 2005 at 10:16:06 AM PDT

              [ Parent ]

          •  Documentation please? (none / 0)

            Not that I think it's a terrible thing  - a number of my in-laws were members in those years. But it's something I wasn't aware of.

            The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.

            by sidnora on Wed Oct 26, 2005 at 05:17:15 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  I could tell you.... (none / 0)

              but then I'd have to kill you....
              No, really, I work for the PWW, the newspaper for the CPUSA and I was told it by a national chair member that I work with. (I am not a member of the party, just play one on, um, work...) Anyway, it was pretty common amongst activists of that time. She may not have made it publicly known, though. There is, however, information on the net about her associations with the Highlander group.

              "Murder, considered a crime when people commit it singly, is transformed into a virtue when they do it en masse." St. Cyprian (200-258)

              by valleycat on Wed Oct 26, 2005 at 10:18:42 AM PDT

              [ Parent ]

  •  Excellent history lesson! (4.00 / 5)

    And a great lesson to all of us to go out there and be active!

    "Take whatever you can, Steal whatever you can't take, Kill what you can't steal so no one else can have it." - Republican Business Philosophy

    by Pen on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 12:46:36 AM PDT

    •  agreed (none / 1)

      i believed that myth.  i also used to believe that the atomic bomb was dropped to save american lives (& had nothing to do with showing Russia who's boss).

      these things don't reduce the magic of our history.  they just show us how we got here & how to keep it going.

    •  Don't just sit there: write letters! (none / 1)

      On the topic of getting active, I've posted a diary (already bumped way off the list, with so much Kos activity today) encouraging people to write letters-to-the-editor in memory of Rosa Parks.

      Diary is HERE.

      "Animals are my friends. And I don't eat my friends." -- George Bernard Shaw

      by Hudson on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 11:52:47 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  outstanding diary (4.00 / 6)

    and it bears remembering.

    Everything--including social change--requires good marketing and political handling.

    Hell, Karl Rove can put lipstick on a pig and sell it as Miss Universe.  We can and must take our ideas and sell them with the same savvy.

    Head to Heading Left, BlogTalkRadio's progressive radio site!

    by thereisnospoon on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 12:47:40 AM PDT

  •  Should be recommended, (none / 0)

    pimped in open thread. Important diary.

    What's so hard about Peace, Love, and Truth and Progress?

    by melvin on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 12:49:01 AM PDT

  •  Same thing happened to MLKJ (4.00 / 24)

    If you have never read (or better yet, listened to) Michael Erid Dyson, now would be a good moment.  His biography of MLKJ, I May Not Get There With You explores how the most radical, inspirational and dangerous elements of his social message have been white-washed (pun intended) by a diverse spread of individuals along all lines of the political spectrum.  The increasing urgency, peaceful militancy and far-reaching social critique of poverty and warfare have been erased, and we're left with a sort of Will Smith style black man that every  white man can love.... (borrowing from The Onion headline....)

    We've already done the same thing to Rosa Parks, sadly.  She's been made apolitical, less deliberate and less socially dangerous than what she actually was.  Thank you so much for taking the time to point this out, so effectively.

    -9.13, -8.56

    Support Irony. Torture Rumsfeld.

    Hail Eris.

    by Transmission on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 12:51:51 AM PDT

    •  Michael Erid Dyson = Michael Eric Dyson (none / 1)

      -9.13, -8.56

      Support Irony. Torture Rumsfeld.

      Hail Eris.

      by Transmission on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 01:02:52 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  The price of being elected to the canon. (4.00 / 5)

      The other choice is for the whole person's work to be demonized and shut out of the ongoing discourse. The Panthers, for instance.

      What's so hard about Peace, Love, and Truth and Progress?

      by melvin on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 01:14:40 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  It is a common theme in American history.... (4.00 / 5)

      To whitewash out the greate social statements.

      Take 'The Jungle.'  Yeah, it was about dirty meat and everyone remembers that.  But it was more about social injustice in the treatement of the poor, and no one seems to recall that.

    •  Whaaaat? (none / 0)

      Sorry, I don't mean to be really argumentative, but in the past month I've been to both the Civil Rights Museum in Memphis (where there's a big display about Rosa Parks and a bus you can enter yourself to get a sense of what Jim Crow was like, by the way) and the King Center in Atlanta, and it doesn't seem to me like anyone who knows anything at all about MLK could escape the knowledge that he was advocating for massive social change.

      I mean, geez.  He was all about the direct action.  Have people not seen images of the fire hoses that met the Selma marchers?  At the time, this was radical extremism.

      All of his books, particularly the 'Letter from the Birmingham Jail,' discuss radical change in the social order.  That said, he had a lot of problems keeping his followers in line after Stokely Carmichael and others turned to violence as a way to accomplish the same ends.  King, who idolized Mohatmas Gandhi, was always careful to follow principles of nonviolence, which include maxims like 'nonviolence seeks to defeat injustice, not people.'

      Read his autobiography (released fairly recently - it's an edited compilation of articles by Clayborne Carson, the head of the King Papers Project at Stanford).  There's some detail in there about how Dr. King went through a period of hatred for white people - sparked by an incident aboard a bus after he won a speech contest in 1942 - but ultimately came to see nonviolence as the only solution.

      The link in this diary goes to a blog entry comparing MLK with Ronald Reagan.  I'd hazard that King would have had some fairly scathing words of criticism for Reagan - if only about Clarence Thomas, but probably for plenty more besides.

      That said, I agree with the poster above who wrote that acts like Rosa Park's often seem to take place in a vacuum and that there's often a gigantic community behind them.

      Bob Corker still sucks. Now more than ever.

      by Eleanor A on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 07:27:44 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  re: MLK (none / 0)

        "The link in this diary goes to a blog entry comparing MLK with Ronald Reagan.  I'd hazard that King would have had some fairly scathing words of criticism for Reagan - if only about Clarence Thomas, but probably for plenty more besides."

        Definitely the "welfare queen" and "homeless by choice" quotes and probably the Mississippi states' rights campaign stump.

        There are a lot of fringe sites that say MLK was a bad character with an anger/violence problem and it's not good...

        Zach W. Morris and John Slater McCain may have seemed like rivals...but they are two peas in a pod

        by BlueEngineerInOhio on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 07:48:20 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

      •  You're talking about museums (none / 1)

        devoted to civil rights history and books written directly by MLK. I think most people in this thread are talking about capsule descriptions in newspapers and textbooks. I think it's quite easy for newspapers and textbooks to shift the focus from a movement demanding massive social change to the bravery of a handful of people confronted with faceless bigots. You understand that the civil rights marchers in the 50s and 60s could be considered radical extremists. But in the retrospective glow of a 21st-century middle-school history textbook, it's the people with the hoses who seem to be the radical extremists, with incomprehensible motives. It seems quite natural to us that blacks should be able to go wherever they want. It's the job of a textbook to remove us from our own familiar context, to disorient us and reorient us to another time. Good textbooks can do that, but there are many that don't.
      •  Small, but Important, Correction (4.00 / 7)

        That said, he had a lot of problems keeping his followers in line after Stokely Carmichael and others turned to violence as a way to accomplish the same ends.

        I invite you to cite a single instance in which Stokely Carmichael "turned to violence," i.e. actually committed a single act of violence.

        Answer:  You can't.  During the entirety of his time with SNCC (which, btw were not "followers" of Dr. King's, but were colleagues under a coalition umbrella of which Dr. King was one part -- even as white America made him the only meaningful voice.)  Even after he became an honorary minister for the Black Panthers.

        What he did say, for the revisionists, is that non-violent resistance was no longer appropriate and that, essentially, if you were getting your ass kicked you had an absolute right to fight back and beat the living shit out of whoever was beating you....and this is the important part....in self-defense.  Same thing as Malcolm X said.  

        How that always ends up being described as "turning to violence" is a study in subconscious motivations all by itself.

        But of course, since Kwame Toure (that's what Stokely Carmichael changed his name to) also coined a highly frightening phrase "Black Power" and a fist to go along with it, and embraced Pan Africanism as an alternative to the martyrism of the movement practiced by Dr. King, it scared the bejeebus out of white people.  So, he's now remembered and described as "turning to violence".

        What a crock.

        /sigh

        •  MLK was becoming more confrontational... (none / 0)

          at the time of his death. His opposition to the Vietnam war and his organizing the march on Washington both estranged him from the Johnson administration. There are some who suggest that this was the reason for his murder.
          I agree that MLK has been sanitized in most history books.

          Excess ain't rebellion. You're drinking what they're selling. - Cake

          by slatsg on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 02:39:14 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

    •  Two of my favorite MLK Jr quotes (4.00 / 6)

      that get excised from the official history:

      "Don't let anybody make you think that God chose America as His divine messianic force to be -- a sort of policeman of the whole world. God has a way of standing before the nations with judgment, and it seems that I can hear God saying to America: "You are too arrogant! If you don't change your ways, I will rise up and break the backbone of your power."

      "Of all the forms of inequality, injustice in health is the most shocking and most inhuman."
      (2nd National Convention of the Medical Committee for Human Rights, Chicago, March 25, 1966)
  •  Rosa Parks was a pillar when we had none. She will (none / 0)

    be missed and I hope she becomes a permanent part of the history of our national struggle for racial and ethnic equality.

    "Bin Laden determined to strike in US"- Presidential Daily Briefing - August 6, 2001

    by What were you thinking on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 12:52:20 AM PDT

  •  It is a sad day to day goodbye to Rosa Parks. I (none / 0)

    wish the very best and I thank her for what she did for all of us.

    The hottest places in hell are reserved for those, who in times of great moral crisis, maintain their neutrality. - Dante

    by GinaNY on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 01:09:19 AM PDT

  •  just what I was thinking (4.00 / 2)

    This diary is so true. Rosa Parks was an activist for social change. She was not just a tired, 'simple', woman.

    And yes, the message of MLK and much of the civil rights movement has been watered down and neutered, as well as balkanized.

    The civil rights movement was not just about black folks. For instance, it provided the momentum for ending the Asian Exclusion Act and other race-based immigration quotas, with the passing of Immigration Act of 1965. (one year after the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

  •  CNN (4.00 / 6)

    Wow!  Great diary and great points.

    I haven't read the NYT obit yet, but here's a blatant case of what you describe from the obituary currently on CNN.com:


    Before her arrest in 1955, Parks was active in the voter registration movement and with the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, where she also worked as a secretary in 1943.

    At the time of her arrest, Parks was 42 and on her way home from work as a seamstress.

    (emphasis added)

    Notice the neat little deception!  By the "in 1943" followed by "At the time of her arrest", it implies she only worked as the NAACP secretary for one year (or less), 12 years before her arrest, which it reinforces with the "on her way home from work as a seamstress" part.

    If what you write is true (and I don't doubt you... I'm just haven't read enough about Rosa Parks), this is so deceptive (downright false!) and (apparantly) deliberate that CNN should be ashamed!!

    Social advance depends as much upon the process through which it is secured as upon the result itself. --Jane Addams

    by shock on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 01:27:05 AM PDT

    •  Oddly enough, the LA times, (none / 1)

      which I don't much care for, does a pretty good job of describing her early life and opinions.

      What's so hard about Peace, Love, and Truth and Progress?

      by melvin on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 03:01:38 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  well... (none / 1)

        Give the Times some credit.  There are ways in which they're miles better than any of those east coast rags on the national stuff, and they actually deserve those Pulitzers for investigative reporting that they have locked up from here until 2025.  They actually do significant reporting on union news, which is something I've never seen another paper do.

        And the columnists rock (and are free online!): Michael Hiltzik, though sometimes a bit more state-oriented, is the nation's best business and econ columnist whose name doesn't rhyme with "Sprugman", and Steve Lopez is a wonderful curmudgeon who when not taking the contrarianism too far writes utter brilliance about L.A. politics (witness the recent 5-part series on Skid  Row, which got Villaraigosa interested enough he ends up a major figure in one of the later ones).

        It's true they skimp on community reporting sometimes, which is too bad because their city and state writing is so good when it's there.  But I actually think that they have most of what a progressive could hope for in a mainstream paper, and I'm not talking bias.

        I guess I got impassioned about this.  Sorry if you feel railroaded, but I wanted to defend my paper of choice and ask you give it a second look.  However powerful a tool and a community the blogosphere is, it's still at this point better at reacting to news than reporting it the first time around, and so far one of the few outlets that still DOES that important task is the Times.

        •  Union News (none / 0)

          For all it's problems, the NYT, primarily because of Stephen Greenhouse, also does a pretty good job of covering labor issues.  They don't devote tons of column space to it, but the pieces they do run are usually of fairly high quality.

          The revolution will not be televised, but we'll analyze it to death at The Next Hurrah.

          by DHinMI on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 11:25:28 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

    •  Wow. Good catch : (none / 0)

      That's a great occasion for a letter to the editor to CNN.
    •  Probably just (4.00 / 6)

      poor writing and editing - it should have read SINCE 1942.

      I greatly admire Rosa Parks.

      She was more than just what modern day people call a "secretary". More than anyone, except perhaps the head of the NAACP at the time, Rosa Parks knew the full extent of the discrimination in Montgomery at the time. When people came to the NAACP to tell their stories of discrimination, Rosa, as secretary, was the one who listened and.or wrote up their accounts of ill treatment - including the story of the teenage girl who had been arrested shortly before.

       She also took on the government by becoming a registered voter - and persevered despite being told she failed. She was connected to the women's political action group (I can't remember the name) that ultimately helped organize the bus boycott in December.

      She taught youths to protest calmly and with dignity against discrimination by going to the white public library and asking for books.

      In a way, it was good spin to have her portrayed as an everyday, god fearing woman, blameless woman (and she wasn't OLD, she was MY age when she was arrested that last time).

      But it ended up marginalizing the great participation women did in the civil rights movement for which they still don't get the credit. That boycott was put together practically overnight by WOMEN at a time when there were no copying machines, no emails, and many did not have phones.

      One of the members of the women's political group worked at a local college and used its mimeograph machine to run off thousands of flyers that then had to be distributed. She could have been fired from her job if the boycott had backfired. Without them, it would not have occurred.

      I've taught the story of Rosa Parks every year to my students with several themes -

      • the civil right movment was political movement that grew from earlier smaller, but continuous attempts to oppose discrimination in all areas of lif

      •  that individual activism is important because Rosa Parks and MLK were only successful in building a strong civil rights response in Montgomery and later the country because when enough ordinary, everyday individuals acted - and stood up (or refuse to stand up), and threw their support behind  it so it became a large political movement.

      • without cooperation and planning, and yes charismatic leades, such a movement cannot grow and change. But without the neighbors, friends, strangers and churches that took up the slack when jobs were lost, taxis refused to pick up blacks, etc., it would not succeeded with just a leader alone.

      • women were the backbone of the movement in many ways - they were the ones most deeply involved in church life - where so much of the organizing and assistance originated

      the truth is as this diary says. Rosa Parks was tired - sick and tired of being disrespected and treated as a second class citizen.

      "Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph." (T. Paine)

      by dmmteacher on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 06:49:57 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Amen to this (4.00 / 3)

        [blockquote]Without cooperation and planning, and yes charismatic leades, such a movement cannot grow and change. But without the neighbors, friends, strangers and churches that took up the slack when jobs were lost, taxis refused to pick up blacks, etc., it would not succeeded with just a leader alone.[blockquote]

        There's a film shown continuously at the King Center in Atlanta that features a member of the movement who was instrumental in helping CORE get insurance for private automobiles being used for carpooling during the bus boycott.  The Alabama government tried to have them all taken off the road as a way to punish blacks who defied them.

        King would have been the first to admit that it took an army.  I suspect he'd be amused to find this sort of cult of personality that has grown up around him.  That said, his wife Coretta has done a lot to ensure there's a holiday, the King Ctr., etc.  

        The Museum of Civil Rights in Memphis in particular goes into great detail about other members of the civil rights movement, tho...King does get a lot of the glory but it doesn't seem to me like it requires a lot of research to find out about the three kids killed in Mississippi, or Fannie Lou Hamer (who made a big fuss on national television at the Democratic National Convention in 1964 about the lack of blacks in the Mississippi state delegation), or Viola Liuzzo, a white mom from Detroit murdered while driving black volunteers.

        I read about this a lot, because this fight is SO not over.  It's a joke to pretend we have a voting rights act in this country when there's one voting machine for 50,000 people in Ohio.  

        I suspect that if BushCo didn't fraudulently raise the threat level every five minutes (including the weekend of his second <strike>installment</strike> inanauguration, there'd've already been some riots in the street.  

        It's just harder to rise up against corporate-fascist economic discrimination that it is something that's so day to day obvious and oppressive like racial discrimination.

        Bob Corker still sucks. Now more than ever.

        by Eleanor A on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 07:39:48 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  Nice diary (none / 1)

    But, the important thing is not who she was, but what came about as a result of her actions.
  •  She was active in the Highlader center (none / 0)

    movement in the and early forties, wasn't she?  
  •  Very interesting, thanks (none / 1)

    I also read yesterday that although she had to drop out of school as a teenager, she returned with encouragement from her husband after they got married, and he also encouraged her to get involved with the NAACP. I don't mean at all that he deserves credit and she less; I just thought, oh yeah, Rosa Parks had a husband, never thought of that, and it sounds like they had a great marriage where they supported each other. Any comments?

    Ashcroft: I don't have a copy of the [UN] Convention [Against Torture] in front of me... Elsinora: I do! Would you like to borrow it?

    by DrReason on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 02:54:26 AM PDT

  •  I learn something new every day at dKos (4.00 / 2)

    Thanks for being today's daily dose.

    Your point that Americans are inherently suspicious of organized political groups and tend to romanticize our heros as naive or innocent is an excellent lesson in itself.

    Thank you for the diary.  

    White woman over 50 for OBAMA!! (Endorsed 10/07)

    by Glinda on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 04:11:31 AM PDT

  •  One more point: (4.00 / 10)

    Rosa Parks provided the perfect test case for challenging Montgomery's segregated bus policy because she was a model citizen, above reproach, active in her community, and educated in the type of nonviolent direct action taught at the Highlander Folk School. Not long before the day she was marched off that bus and into history, another young African American woman had also refused to give up her seat on a Montgomery bus.  Her name was Caludette Colvin, she was 15, pregnant, and cursed the bus driver.  Nobody knows where she is now.  

    Yes, history is never as simple as it is taught in elementary school, or in the MSM.  Yet that should not take away from the fact that Rosa Parks was the right person in the right place at the right time; and as this diary so competently illustrates, she was ready.

    That's one of the questions MLK used to pose to people: What if tomorrow the burden falls upon you?  Will you be ready and willing to take it up?  On this day, that is a good question for us all to ask ourselves.

    Ever notice how conservatives don't conserve anything?

    by MHB on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 04:28:53 AM PDT

    •  Excellent question (none / 0)

      I remember this, from one of my PACS program courses as an undergrad.

      The case of Colvin shows that nonviolent civil disobedience is not something spontaneous; it occurs only with strong organization, planning, and, in order to be successful, a fully informed understanding of the social structures it is operating against. And therein lies its strength.

    •  She lives in New York, (3.66 / 3)

      here is an update on her.  

      Rosa was the right person at the right time.  She was a working woman, paid her taxes, etc, and I think it was easier for white America to sympathize with her than with Claudette.  People don't take teenagers seriously; I think it would have been too easy for people to blow off Claudette because of her youth.    

      "I said no deal; you can't sell this stuff to me" - Townes Van Zandt

      by btrflisoul on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 06:31:45 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Interesting excerpt from that article (4.00 / 2)

        Gray said he told Parks and other Montgomery leaders that he thought Colvin's arrest was a good test ease to end segregation on the buses, but Black leadership thought they should wait.

        "We didn't feel that the time was right to do what needed to be done and get the kind of support we needed to get," he said.

        Nearly a year later, on Feb. 1, 1956, Colvin was one of four Black women who served as plaintiffs in a federal court suit, known as Browder v. Gayle, that became the legal vehicle when the U.S. Supreme Court declared bus segregation unconstitutional in December 1956. The Parks arrest case, while sparking the boycott, was a state case.

        So this was a case where an organization decided to postpone action -- if only by a few months -- and was ultimately successful. I think that's important to mention. In the discussions of the movements for striking down prohibitions on gays in the military and gay marriage, anyone suggesting that there is a proper time to push for this is usually shouted down with a paraphrase of MLK:

        We know through painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor; it must be demanded by the oppressed. Frankly, I have yet to engage in a direct-action campaign that was "well timed" in the view of those who have not suffered unduly from the disease of segregation. For years now I have heard the word "Wait!" It rings in the ear of every Negro with piercing familiarity. This "Wait" has almost always meant 'Never." We must come to see, with one of our distinguished jurists, that "justice too long delayed is justice denied."

        But earlier in that same letter, he wrote a paragraph that puts this one in context:

        Then it occurred to us that Birmingham's mayoralty election was coming up in March, and we speedily decided to postpone action until after election day. When we discovered that the Commissioner of Public Safety, Eugene "Bull" Connor, had piled up enough votes to be in the run-off we decided again to postpone action until the day after the run-off so that the demonstrations could not be used to cloud the issues. Like many others, we waited to see Mr. Connor defeated, and to this end we endured postponement after postponement. Having aided in this community need, we felt that our direct-action program could be delayed no longer.

        So first they waited for the results of an election, and then they decided they could wait no longer. And the strategy worked for them.

        •  The letter from Birmingham Jail (none / 1)

          can be found here.  
        •  Yes, Important Point, But At the Same Time... (none / 1)

          ...I think it's important to point out that the reason we had gay marriage amendment bans on so many state ballots last year wasn't really because of San Francisco.  It had been percolating up on the whacky right for a few years even before San Francisco and Massachusetts.  And outside the US, the Ontario supreme court decision was also a major factor.  So while your point is one that I enthusiastically second, I think one should be a little careful in citing gay marriage as an example lest people mistakenly assume that it was a simple cause-effect arc from San Francisco weddings in 2003 leading without any other influences directly to the 13 wedding amendments on state ballots in 2004.

          The revolution will not be televised, but we'll analyze it to death at The Next Hurrah.

          by DHinMI on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 11:34:35 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

  •  same old story (none / 0)

    "He who controls the present, controls the past. He who controls the past, controls the future."
       -- George Orwell

    in fact everything of political importance i have first hand experience of (or at least the stuff that had some media coverage) like how life in the GDR was, or how the Wall came down has been presented to the people in a sometimes slightly modified way, sometimes it has been a complete misinformation ...

    So for instance chancelor Kohl is called here the "chancelor of german unity" .. and noone talks about the civil rights and civil libery movements of the GDR anymore, that where the driving force behind all this ...

    so do you believe that Oswald killed JFK? That Woodward and Berstein where the ones responsible for revealing Watergate?

    i think i know better

    Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen. -- Albert Einstein

    by TheGerman on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 04:32:09 AM PDT

  •  This makes me wonder about... (4.00 / 6)

    ...all the anonymous acts of defiance that really were spontaneous, but because those people didn't have have anyone to back them up, they fell through the cracks and became just another crime statistic.  The unsung heroes, as it were, who simply got stomped on by the system and never made a blip on the radar.  As I think about Rosa Park's legacy, I leave some room to reflect on all those who helped break down the barriers without fame or reward.

    Thanks, Josh.

    •  It's easier (4.00 / 4)

      to stomp them if they don't have a movement to back them up, isn't it? Which is the whole point of this story that spreads: make sure people don't know or understand the important of community.  Make them think it happens with individuals taking stands.  Then stomp them one by one like roaches.

      I will note that the broken barriers are their own reward!

      How can we get over it when people died for the right to vote? -- John Lewis

      by furryjester on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 06:07:31 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Thanks for that comment (4.00 / 2)

      Parks may not have been as "simple" as some say.  And I recall there was vetting done about who they were gonna throw support behind, shine the spotlight on.

      But the act she's famous for was simple.  Also deep.  And the legend that ordinary people can make a difference by a simple principled act is a good one, worthy of not being squashed.  I could say something about the lone guy who stood up to the tank in China in 1989, but it's so complicated, particularly considering how China's progressed since then.

      And she was working as a seamstress at the time, and was on the bus on the way home from that job.  And did lose that job as a result of her brave action.

      I'm looking forward to a commemorative postage stamp to honor her memory.

      Wire service caption (emphasis added):
      WOMAN FINGERPRINTED  - Mrs. Rosa Parks, Negro seamstress whose refusal to move to the back of a bus touched off the bus boycott of Montgomery, Ala., last December, is fingerprinted by Deputy Sheriff D.H. Lackey in Montgomery, Feb.22.  Mrs. Parks, whose appeal on a $14 fine for violating segregation laws was turned down, is among 100 or so Montgomery Negroes indicted by a grand jury on anti-boycott charges.

      (from personal files)

      The movie "The Long Walk Home" starring Whoopi Goldberg & Sissy Spacek, is a decent portrayal of the time, and might be worth watching again in light of today's headlines.

      "You can't depend on your judgment when your imagination is out of focus."
      . . . . . . . . . Mark Twain

      by Land of Enchantment on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 06:42:06 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Both the individual and the movement (4.00 / 2)

        Yes, both are important.  The movement is essential to amplify the personal sense of outrage we feel.  But the core personal story is equally important. I met Rosa Parks once in 1970 at an SCLC conference.  Although she was a central part of the movement for dignity of all people, she didn't take the spotlight.  She still said that she didn't move "because my feet hurt."  By not letting herself become a celebrity with superhuman goals, she continued to connect with all those who work on their feet all day and who wish just to be treated with dignity at the end of the day.  

        Retaining humility as we fight superhuman fights is rare.  She achieved this so well.  

        Maybe if mothers (and men with a mother's heart) ran the world, we would stop killing so many people.

        by chichagof on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 07:07:09 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  An important lesson (4.00 / 5)

    for folks at dKos too.

    Thanks for keeping the movement part of the movement history alive.  The myth of individualism is so strong in America that we see everything through that lens, including the decidedly non-individual moments and movements.

    Words can sometimes, in moments of grace, attain the quality of deeds. --Elie Wiesel

    by a gilas girl on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 04:55:08 AM PDT

  •  debunk one myth, create another (3.33 / 3)

    this is a great diary.  thank you.

    still, i think you're distorting the reality somewhat to make it conform to your point.  Parks' regular practice of refusing to be mistreated "on the buses and anywhere else" is not an example of strategic organizing and planned imagery.

    the error you're making, as i see it, is thinking in two categories to describe three different types of behavior.  on one end of the spectrum is the mythical spontaneous act, on the other end, the contrived image.  in between lies what i'll term authentic perseverance.

    of course there are gradations within those broad categories.  still, i think the broad categories provide an important distinction.  without it, you conflate Parks' pattern of resistance with "carefully planned events which followed months of organizing and were conceived with an eye to political tactics and media imagery."  

    this is more than an academic point, for in debunking the spontaneous act you seem to me to suggest that authenticity isn't essential.  in my mind, the falseness of that position is illustrated by John Kerry's hollow 'reporting for duty' moment.  Obviously it was extensively planned, and shot so as to surround the saluting one-time officer with a gargantuan image of his saluting self.  yet, as i saw it anyway, it was grotesque and ineffective - not because it was obviously planned, but because it was entirely contrived.

    "Oftentimes there's only one thing more dangerous than thinking that you're right: Being right." -Simon Malthus

    by dreamsign on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 05:05:35 AM PDT

    •  Actually, her action was well planned. (none / 0)

      There was a reason that she was chosen for this test case.

      Excess ain't rebellion. You're drinking what they're selling. - Cake

      by slatsg on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 02:26:25 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  interesting (none / 0)

        my point still stands, though.  there's a difference between planned and contrived.  there's an old formula:

        the right people in the right place at the right time.

        "Oftentimes there's only one thing more dangerous than thinking that you're right: Being right." -Simon Malthus

        by dreamsign on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 04:24:38 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  Morning Edition's Cheryl Corley... (3.66 / 6)

    gets it right.  The audio will be available after 10:00 ET this morning; it is a really  nice piece.  She even mentions that it is a fallacy that Ms. Parks didn't give up her seat on the bus that day because "her feet were tired," and explains that it was an activist event.

    What a woman!

    "No self-respecting woman should wish or work for the success of a Party that ignores her sex." -- Susan B. Anthony http:www.twtp.org

    by Yellow Dog Dem Woman on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 05:18:53 AM PDT

    •  CNN : Parks was a "seamstress" ! (none / 0)

      But the mythologists have botched the Parks whitewashing.

      Here - I'll rewrite the whitewash and do a better job at it :

      [ The SCMSM on]  the death of Rosa Parks

      Accidental Activist Rosa Parks, 92, dies

      Today marks the passage of iconic legend Rosa Parks, inadvertant hero of the Civil Rights struggle.

      "I ain't no uppity black lady," Parks often quipped in public, "I's likes white folks. Dey's alright by me. Dis here's a fine country we got here, and respect for private property rights is what's makes it dat way."  

      Parks grew up in a rough single room shack in the deep south, illiterate daughter of sharecroppers, and Mrs. Parks career as a pioneer in the Civil Rights movement came about quite by accident.

      As Parks recounted to a CNN reporter last year:

      "I's was goin' home on de bus, all tuckered out from 16 hours sewing dresses, and 'dis white man comes up to me whiles I was asleep on da bus seat, and I would'a given' up dat seat just fine, but instead of askin' nice that white man started kickin' me in the feet and cussin' and when I woke up I kinda jolted a little, and he thought I was kickin' back !

      "Dat nice white man thought I was kickin' back ! Lordy ! Happens, I was just gettin' ready to give up my seat for dat nince white man, but he thought I kicked him back and started hollerin out loud to everybody on the bus "Lookee here ! She's not gonna give up her seat !"

      "Thing is, I never said nothin' of the sort. Dat white man said it all and he was hollering so loud, over and over that I wan't gonna give up my seat, I didn't feel like I had any choice but to not give up my seat.

      "Then, they threw me in jail ad this nice preacher man - oh he was so handsome, he spoke so well, like an angel, that Martin Luther King fellow, he comes to my jail cell and tells me I have to stick up for da black folks.

      "I told him, 'I don't want to. I'm just a feeble, weak woman what has bad  teeth and can't read a lick. Plus, my mammy told me - Rosa, nail sticks out gets whacked down - an' so I don' want to get whacked down. I ain't no hero.'

      "But dat Martin, he was a smart man and he just ignored me and said - 'Rosa, shut up. I'm going to make you a hero' - and the rest's just history."

      Mrs. Parks is survived by a large number off politically passive, patriotic Americans who are grateful to live in the United States -  in part for for it's exemplary civil rights laws that ensued following the Civil Rights struggle that arose from Parks' accidental leadership.

      Three days before her death, Rosa Parks told a reporter for the Des Moines Register Gazette, "I cried all da day long when they killed dat Martin Luther, but dat Malcom X fellow, he got what's he deserved.  See, anythin' good happens to da black folks happens by accident, 'cept of course it's not accident at all, it's God's will. People don't get nothin' by tryin'. I got all I got in life by da grace of God, not by readin' or book learnin' or political activizin' no sirree. God just took me and made me what I was, and I din't have no choice. No sirree. It was all da grace 'O God, lord be praised."  

  •  I second this post (4.00 / 16)

    I participated in one of the early sit-ins.  It wasn't a particularly dangerous one -- integrating a barbershop in southern Ohio -- but because it was one of the first, it wasn't safe, either.  I can't say I was particularly afraid for myself physically -- though in a subsequent sit-in my brother was roughed up by the police -- but the fear that my then unknowable future would be affected by McCarthy-type persecution sometime down the line was palpable.  There was real choice.

    We prepared that sit-in for three weeks, meeting nearly every day, rehearsing strategies, learning non-violent technique, and getting our story straight.  It did take a lot of organization in the fall and early winter of 1960-1961.

    Later, when it became clear that the risks were not as great as we originally thought, more people joined the movement, and it became less disciplined, and more a mediuim of late-adolescent self-expresson.  The serious ones went down to Mississippi to enroll voters.  There was less planning, and things sometimes got out of hand, as they did later in the Vietnam protests, which were largely unplanned, and in my view much less effective in consequence.

    I'm so glad you posted this.  You are dead right.  It takes a lot of planning, and skill, and perseverance to effect major social change.  And it takes assuming risk.  There are always casualties.  That's why we need an instructed, militant Left. I think Ms Sheehan best exemplifies that type of militancy today.

    •  We're all in your debt for that. (none / 0)

      I hope you don't mind my vicious satire of the mythologizing of Rosa Parks !

      [ I felt called to do it after I read on this thread that CNN had reported that Parks was "seamstress" . ]

      Your story just goes to show how individual acts of courage, at the right place and time, can move mountains.

    •  Disagree about Cindy Sheehan. (4.00 / 6)

      I want to be very clear that I am NOT criticizing her.  The complaint I have is NOT with Cindy Sheehan and is NOT her fault.

      But she's an example of the problem mentioned elsewhere in this thread, of how the media divorces political speech and action from its proper context.  Because to be "political" is a bad thing in our culture.  One of the only contexts in which political speech IS acceptable is when it's a mother speaking out of fear or concern for her children.  This is documented extensively in Nina Eliasoph's Avoiding Politics, a sociological study of how people do and don't talk about politics in America.

      Eliasoph talks about how activists who engaged in serious debate about policy issues changed their tone completely when in front of TV cameras.  They become concerned moms: "We're in it because I have a son, and she has a daughter.  We're worried."  To an extent this was a learned behavior because if they didn't couch their concerns in "mom" terms? The cameras were turned off.

      The problem here is that there have been people marching and protesting since before the war began.  There was a movement! Where was the news coverage? It wasn't until there was a story that fit their favorite narrative - a mother in anguish over how public policy harmed her children - that the media got interested.  That's why Cindy Sheehan is famous: because she's the archetype of the media's favorite story.  I know a journalist who actually, seriously thinks there was no anti-war movement or activity before Cindy Sheehan.

      That's why, even though it's great that Cindy Sheehan has gotten some real attention when nobody else could - we've got to look beyond her success and find ways to break out of this mom-mold.  Because there is much more to be said about war, about poverty, about everything, than you can say as a white middle class mom worried about her children (and no one else's).

      How can we get over it when people died for the right to vote? -- John Lewis

      by furryjester on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 06:23:08 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Parks, Sheehan, Movements, Hippies, MSM, DKos (4.00 / 8)

        You're absolutely right, furryjester, about Cindy Sheehan (or rather the reception of Cindy Sheehan) and the broader anti-war movement.  But don't just make a scapegoat out of the right-wing corporate media. Not that they haven't done plenty of what you describe. But even those who are often very critical of the RWCM have participated in this discourse about Sheehan, the antiwar movement, and politics.

        Take this community for instance.  We all remember the (justified, IMO) firestorm over our host's attack on anti-war "hippies" some months ago. But what got a bit lost in the shuffle was that this was just the ugly tip of a much larger iceberg that had been floating around dKos almost since the start of the Iraq War.  Not just kos, but many frontpagers and other prominent Kossacks had long since gotten into the habit of asserting that there really wasn't an antiwar movement at all (this largely prior to the Cindy Sheehan phenomenon).  Usually, this assertion was made in the context of polls showing the public's growing disatisfaction with Iraq (as in "even in the absence of an anti-war movement, the public has turned against this war").  Often these comments went unremarked upon on dKos.  "There is no antiwar movement" was almost conventional wisdom even around here.

        And when, on occasion, the movement demanded that it be noticed (when yet again hundreds of thousands of people turned out in the streets), it was often dismissed culturally ("they're just hippies") or politically ("look at how nutty ANSWER is"; cf. Southern critiques of the Civil Rights Movement that blamed it on outside, Communist agitators) in ways that simply ignored the great breadth and diversity of that movement.

        The truth is that there was a large antiwar movement even before the U.S. invaded Iraq. It certainly is not above criticism (indeed, the success of the "there is no movement" meme even among progressives might be a good starting point for a thorough critique of the movement's strategies, operations, and tactics).  But that it existed -- and exists -- is incontrovertible.  And yet, if a future historian were to write the history of opposition to the Iraq war based on frontpage posts on dKos (I know this seems unlikely...), it would be a tale of a slow, but steady revulsion to a once nearly universally popular war that developed despite the nonexistence of an antiwar movement, which was dominated by unthinking leftist sectarians whose work only served to limit public opposition to the war. (NB: I know that story is internally inconsistent -- there both is no antiwar movement, and the antiwar movement is dangerous and counterproductive -- but myths are often internally inconsistent.  Read Genesis lately?)

        As with the myth of Rosa Parks, the growing myths about the antiwar movement are in part designed to question the usefulness -- or even the sanity -- of all political activity that is not ultimately aimed at the electoral success of one or the other of the two major parties.  

        So here's an "Amen" to Rosa Parks mythbusting. And let's try to view our present situation more clearly, lest we find ourselves needing to do this again when, some decades from now, we review the history of our extracting ourselves from the Iraq mess (and hopefully from the larger patterns of American international behavior that it instantiates).

        This nicely summarizes what's wrong with American political life today. (Source)

        by GreenSooner on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 06:58:46 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  Well, the problem is (none / 0)

          As I just posted a few minutes ago, that it's harder to rise up against a nebulous foe like corporate economic fascism, as opposed to the racism practiced all over the South during Jim Crow.

          It's especially harder when the government, in this case BushCo, has many additional tools to use to oppress those who would oppose it.

          Can you say Patriot Act, anyone?  Also, I do think there would have been more major acts of opposition were people not sheepishly going along with BushCo's allegations that there are terrorists on every street corner.

          Bob Corker still sucks. Now more than ever.

          by Eleanor A on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 07:45:07 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  Half Agree (none / 0)

            Jim Crow laws, in post-World War II America, did indeed prove to be a big target, whose evil could be easily sold to an important constituency not directly affected by them, i.e. white, Northern liberals.  

            But racism is just as nebulous as corporate fascism (I'm not sure I'm 100% comfortable with the "fascism" part of this, but I'll use it for the sake of argument). And, like corporate fascism, there are many people in our society who directly benefit from it without entirely realizing it.

            The Black freedom struggle ran into real political difficulties precisely when it tried to move beyond the issue of Jim Crow. When Martin Luther King marched into Chicago and raised the issue of residential segregation, resistance proved all too effective. And we still haven't solved the problems addressed by the Poor People's March that King was involved in organizing at the end of his career.

            Finally, since the anti-political Parks mythos has grown up around the soft underbelly that was Jim Crow laws, I'm not sure your valid distinction between the tangible target (Jim Crow and, I think, Iraq) and the nebulous structural force (racism, imperialism, corporate fascism) is wholly determinative.

            This nicely summarizes what's wrong with American political life today. (Source)

            by GreenSooner on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 07:57:16 AM PDT

            [ Parent ]

        •  You're quite right. (none / 1)

          Eliasoph doesn't only point to the media, and I shouldn't have implied that was the only problem.  It's a cultural thing.  I guess cultures are built to resist change.  This is one of the ways ours does.

          As with the myth of Rosa Parks, the growing myths about the antiwar movement are in part designed to question the usefulness -- or even the sanity -- of all political activity that is not ultimately aimed at the electoral success of one or the other of the two major parties.

          This is very well stated and very apt.  Outside our political circles, our liberal blogs, of course, you could just stop with "all political activity" and have an accurate statement.  Within this community, political activity itself is encouraged, but only certain sorts, and only to certain ends.  I've been thinking about this issue.  I identify strongly as a Democrat but I am wondering lately if perhaps something more is needed.  On the bus this morning I was reading letters exchanged between Emma Goldman and Alexander Berkman...

          ...and this comment got so long I've morphed it into a diary, which is here: Emma Goldman On Political Compromise

          I would love to hear your thoughts on it.

          How can we get over it when people died for the right to vote? -- John Lewis

          by furryjester on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 08:51:21 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

        •  Which Front Pagers... (none / 0)

          ...claimed there wasn't an anti-war movement?  

          The revolution will not be televised, but we'll analyze it to death at The Next Hurrah.

          by DHinMI on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 11:39:20 AM PDT

          [ Parent ]

          •  For Example... (none / 0)

            On June 22, 2005, Armando wrote a diary that began by quoting approvingly from a Harold Myerson column:  "In the absence of an antiwar movement, the American people have turned against the war in Iraq. Those two facts, I suspect, are connected."

            On August 14, 2005, here's Armando again blogging about the lack of an antiwar movement.

            (This is what I was able to find doing a cursory search.  Perhaps it has just been kos and Armando...though that covers a fair bit of ground around these parts.)

            This nicely summarizes what's wrong with American political life today. (Source)

            by GreenSooner on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 12:24:30 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

      •  Thanks for the Eliasoph reference (none / 0)

        ...sounds like a great book.  I'm a fan of her other work.

        (great analysis, too)

        Words can sometimes, in moments of grace, attain the quality of deeds. --Elie Wiesel

        by a gilas girl on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 02:11:04 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  I thought I was the only one! (none / 0)

          hee.  I've never seen her mentioned here - not that I read the whole site, of course.  But anyway, this book particularly is wonderful for the information, but... it was her dissertation. And it reads like it.  I wish she'd do a short and sweet popularly digestible version of it, like Lakoff's Don't Think of an Elephant is to Moral Politics.

          How can we get over it when people died for the right to vote? -- John Lewis

          by furryjester on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 05:00:57 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

  •  Narrative (4.00 / 11)

       The theme of the overall narrative which can only sanctify Ms. Parks by pretending that she was "apolitical" is one that pretends that politics and political action is a bad thing, which taints anything associated with it: when, in fact, a response to some issues must of necessity be political.

       Take, for instance, the response to Wilson's whistleblowing on the Niger-Yellowcake fraud.  The Republican response? "That's just politics.  Wilson was just playing politics."  Meaning what?  That Wilson wasn't really concerned about whether the government spouts lies as part of its official propaganda, but was... uh... coming up with this story as a front for his concerns about, oh, social security or civil rights or religious freedom?  Come on.  
       OF COURSE questions about whether the country should engage in aggression and whether the government has the right to lie in order to further that aggression are political!  And there's nothing wrong with that.  Is Joe Wilson political?  Is Cindy Sheehan political?  Yes they are, very much: the fact of being involved in issues of this sort makes them political.  The media would have us believe that the only credible witness to an event is the non-partisan idiot who has never had an idea on a political question in his or her life, and then suddenly, spontaneously, magically expresses the will of the whole people in an unpreconceived action.
        Well, that's not a democratic theme.  That's a fascist theme: the idea of the apolitical savior on the white horse who saves the country from the squabbling of the undependable, venal politicians (the last word said with a sneer).  And it's a narrative we should be very uncomfortable with, and we should not let the media get away with it.  We need politics, good clean politics: now more than ever.  Mussolini got rid of politics in Italy in 1922, but that didn't work out so well.  It would be great to see more discussion of instances where the media imposes this narrative, condemning legitimate political action as "just politics".  We need to supersede that with a new narrative of just and popular political action overcoming the "apolitical" tycoons who are looting the country.

    •  Very, very well said nt (none / 1)

      How can we get over it when people died for the right to vote? -- John Lewis

      by furryjester on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 06:12:48 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Well said. (4.00 / 3)

      Also, a Phil Ochs song come to my mind :

      Love Me, I'm a Liberal

      By Phil Ochs

        E               A           E     A
      I cried when they shot Medgar Evers
      E                   C#m
      Tears ran down my spine
         E              A          E
      I cried when they shot Mr. Kennedy
                     F#7             B7
      As though I'd lost a father of mine
           E        A              E
      But Malcolm X got what was coming
         G#m                        A
      He got what he asked for this time
         E        C#m      A        B7    E
      So love me, love me, love me, I'm a liberal

      I go to civil rights rallies
      And I put down the old D.A.R.
      I love Harry and Sidney and Sammy
      I hope every colored boy becomes a star
      But don't talk about revolution
      That's going a little bit too far
      So love me, love me, love me, I'm a liberal

      I cheered when Humphrey was chosen
      My faith in the system restored
      I'm glad the commies were thrown out
      Of the A.F.L. C.I.O. board
      I love Puerto Ricans and Negros
      As long as they don't move next door
      So love me, love me, love me, I'm a liberal

      The people of old Mississippi
      Should all hang their heads in shame
      I can't understand how their minds work
      What's the matter don't they watch Les Crane?
      But if you ask me to bus my children
      I hope the cops take down your name
      So love me, love me, love me, I'm a liberal

      I read New Republic and Nation
      I've learned to take every view
      You know, I've memorized Lerner and Golden
      I feel like I'm almost a Jew
      But when it comes to times like korea
      There's no one more red, white and blue
      So love me, love me, love me, I'm a liberal

      I vote for the democtratic party
      They want the U.N. to be strong
      I go to all the Pete Seeger concerts
      He sure gets me singing those songs
      I'll send all the money you ask for
      But don't ask me to come on along
      So love me, love me, love me, I'm a liberal

      Once I was young and impulsive
      I wore every conceivable pin
      Even went to the socialist meetings
      Learned all the old union hymns
      But I've grown older and wiser
      And that's why I'm turning you in
      So love me, love me, love me, I'm a liberal

  •  Great diary (4.00 / 2)

    And it's never been more important to highlight Rosa Park's actions were political because it reminds us that not all "political" acts are perpetuated by sleazes like Karl Rove. Politics isn't just about partisan bickering or amoral thugs like Rove playing dirty tricks.

    Bushco, putting the mock in democracy.

    by Southern Bell on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 05:45:28 AM PDT

  •  Thank You for this Diary of Truth (4.00 / 3)

    There has been so much mythmaking surrounding the civil rights movement that, in some ways, many people have missed the larger messages contained in it.  Perhaps because we see the heroes as larger than life, we don't emulate them the way we should today.  Food for thought.

    Recommended.

  •  rosa parks remains a heroine of america (4.00 / 2)

    regardless of what her political position was

    in that time.. in that place.. black were shot dead for lesser transgressions against whites

    it took a lot of courage

    thats a fact

  •  I live in Detroit and it's not popular (1.80 / 5)

    to say Mrs. Parks was over-rated.  But I believe she was.  Don't get me wrong.  She was a nice lady who worked hard for civil rights over a long period of time.  But when the mayor of Detroit (running for re-election) waxes on about how she is "one of the most important people in the history of the world," I get totally turned off.

    I always wonder about the woman who refused to go to the back of the bus BEFORE Rosa Parks, but the NAACP wouldn't take her case because she was an unwed mother and therefore, less desirable as a plantiff.

    There are times when principle is sacrificed for pragmatism and PR.  Fine.  But let's not confuse the two.

    thanks for this diary.  My husband and I were trying to watch a show last night and the local news kept interrupting it to say that this was a "breaking" story: Rosa Parks...still dead.  

    Pardon my cynicism.

    McCain is not a moderate, a maverick, or a man of integrity.

    by marjo on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 05:58:18 AM PDT

    •  Pardon me, but based on your ... (4.00 / 2)

      ...comment I don't think you quite understand the Diarist's point. It wasn't to say Rosa Parks was "over-rated" or not all she was cranked up by the mythologists to be. It was that those who fought Jim Crow - sometimes losing their lives - didn't just depend on this person's bit of courage or that person's single action. They thought long and carefully about their strategy and tactics. For the record, men and women who organized for the NAACP in the South of the '30s and '40s and '50s were heroes. And every American, of whatever color, owes them big time for their willingness to fight an entrenched and legal system of race supremacy.

      Like a cyclone, imperialism spins across the globe; militarism crushes peoples and sucks their blood like a vampire. K. Liebknecht

      by Meteor Blades on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 10:29:51 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  that's the point (none / 0)

        I thought I was agreeing with.  It was a long-term concerted effort.  I get tired of it being simplified to the Rosa Parks story.  That seems to me to diminish the sacrifices of others.

        maybe I didn't express myself well.

        McCain is not a moderate, a maverick, or a man of integrity.

        by marjo on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 01:48:56 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]