What are Miers and Bush hiding? Is there any precedent for a supreme court nominee withdrawing or failing due to the need to protect confidentiality with a standing president?
So, who were the following sentiments expressed for:
"It would not be in the interests of the US to reveal details of her work within the White House, she added." (from http://news.bbc.co.uk/...)
What ARE they hiding? There is a clear pattern starting with Cheney when he refused to release notes from a meeting with the energy industry where energy policy was written. We are the royal presidency and we need not reveal squat to the confused masses.
Something stinks in Denmark. Good thing she withdrew.
At some point 43 will want to be seen as more than the dimwit druggie (nothing personal against dimwit druggies unless they are also liars) and this might turn out for the best.