Skip to main content

We grab a handful of audio books and leave for our long drive to Thanksgiving at the relatives -- we'll "read" while we're driving. We hurry into the "handicap stall" at the airport because it's big enough to accommodate a person and her rollbag.  In the noisy airport bar, we're able to follow the news because the bartender's put the TV on "mute" and the captions pop up, the type scrolling across the bottom of the screen.

This Thankstgiving, we should pause to give thanks to the folks who brought us all these things: the activists of the disability rights movement.

The  disability rights movement has changed the face of America, moving us toward a more "accessible" society. People who are blind, or deaf, or who need to use wheelchairs have done a lot to change our society and our environment -- and the changes intended to open society for them have had a spin-off benefit for  all of us. Their ideas and their insistence on being included are building a more accommodating landscape, a more easily navigated environment, a more welcoming society for us all.

Inventions like audio books and optical character recognition (OCR) software, TV captioning and even email -- things we now take for granted and that make life easier -- can often be traced to people whose way of navigating the world showed them the potential of ideas that may have slipped by the rest of us.
The idea for captions came from deaf advocates, who pressured Congress to require them for most TV programs, and to require TVs to come equipped with caption decoders. Today, captions benefit patrons of noisy bars, immigrants learning English (who keep the sound on for a ready-made teaching tool) and youngsters learning to read. Audio books originated in the Talking Books program popularized by blind activists decades ago. Roomy toilet stalls, required for wheelchair access, are a result of disability advocates' work to change building codes and state laws. We're all grateful for an elevator from the subway up to the street. Curb cuts make life easier not just for the wheelchair users for whom they were intended, but for travelers pulling rollbags, for bike riders, skateboarders, UPS workers, Segway users and parents pushing baby strollers.
A surprising amount of today's technology has its roots in products originally conceived to help disabled people. Much like Willie Sutton, who robbed banks because that was where the money was, inventors invent things for disabled people because they're the ones who need the inventions. But the inventions end up helping all of us. Alexander Graham Bell had designed the telephone in an effort to help deaf people communicate. For that purpose, it was a decided flop. For the rest of us? Why, it changed our lives.
For those of us whose bodies lie within the midrange of physical and sensory capabilities, the status-quo environment works fine. After all, it evolved to suit the average person. But the place where invention occurs, the place where innovation occurs, the exciting place, is at the margins. This is why so many visionaries, from Dean Kamen with his Segway, which he envisioned only after designing his iBot wheelchair, to Ray Kurzweil with his original $30,000 Kurzweil Reading Machine talking computer for the blind which morphed into today's OCR software, have had their vision honed by work with disabled people.
Kamen and Kurzweil trace their inventions' starts to ideas suggested by disabled people. Others, like Vinton Cerf, the Internet guru credited with the development of "packet" technology who came up with a use for the application which we know today as email, may see a potential use where others do not; they see it because they're attuned to the needs of someone whose body doesn't function within that midrange. Cerf, hearing impaired for many years, and his wife, profoundly deaf from childhood, saw the potential for email because it was, for them, an easier way to "call" each other.
People who are not inventors or engineers at all have changed things too. Disability civil rights activists have seen the design of a more accessible society -- or built environment -- as a matter of simple justice.
Atlanta's Eleanor Smith, also a longtime wheelchair user, was driving around Atlanta one day in her van, just happening to pass through a newly built subdivision, when she had her new idea: "All these homes -- all of them -- could have been visitable!" "Visitable" was the term Smith settled on to describe her idea: just three simple features that would cost builders of new single-family homes virtually nothing -- a no-step entrance, wider doors and halls, and one big main-floor bathroom -- would ensure that a person in a wheelchair could at least visit: get in, visit with the family, and use the bathroom. Visitability would also mean that homeowners would find it easier to roll bulky and heavy items -- furniture, computers -- in and out of their homes. It would simply make homes easier to live in.
Today "visitable" communities are springing up nationwide -- 3,000 new visitable homes in Bolingbrook, Illinois, alone in the last year or so.
One of the first companies to specifically adopt universal design principles for product design was Oxo, whose Good Grips line of kitchen and garden utensils has become immensely popular. "When all users' needs are taken into consideration in the initial design process, the result is a product that can be used by the broadest spectrum of users," says the company: "a salad spinner that can be used with one hand; liquid measuring cups that can be read from above without bending over; a toilet brush that bends to reach out-of-the-way places; a backlit oven thermometer that can be read easily through the window of an oven door; kettles with whistle lids that open automatically when tipped to pour; and tools with pressure-absorbing, non-slip handles that make them more efficient."
What universal design visionaries share is the realization that something seen as beneficial to ordinary, everyday people will win out every time over something labeled "special for the handicapped."
Something to give thanks for.

Originally posted to mjohnson on Wed Nov 23, 2005 at 07:44 AM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  consilience (none)
    The things you mention (and many others) are examples of consilience, where there are multiple reasons for doing something. When a choice is consilient that is another reason to think it may be the right choice.

    And I am proud to have Tom Harkin as my senator -

    -- Be the change you wish to see. Gandhi

    by Wee Mama on Wed Nov 23, 2005 at 10:28:50 AM PST

    •  re: consilience (none)
      That's a new term to me. Thanks for pointing it out -- I'll remember it. And yes, Sen. Harkin is certainly someone to be thankful for!
      •  consilience (none)
        is a term from moral theology. Another one that is a likely pointer to the right choice is subsidiarity (happening at the lowest level that is appropriate and possible). It was expressed this way by one person:

        "It is wrong for a superior body to retain the
        right to make decisions than an inferior body
        is already able to make for itself."

        There are a couple of other characteristics that go with consilience and subsidiarity but I can't remember them at the moment.

        -- Be the change you wish to see. Gandhi

        by Wee Mama on Wed Nov 23, 2005 at 11:48:11 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site