I see that a brouhaha is developing over some of Kos' remarks.
I also see that EricNYC is out there inflaming the masses and inciting revolution.
I'm just an old bum, who occasionally has thoughts. Here's how my brain scrambles things up ...
First, Eric in NYC:
How about a little less passionate defense of your man Kerry?
A little more thought would be helpful, unless you can prove to non-religious, hard-headed me that Kerry is a god. I didn't think he was a god, but he does seem to be yours.
The way to win political office is to recognize the truth about your guy and the other guy, and be practical. Our side is never perfect. The other guy, unless he's Adolph or Uncle Joe, is not likely to be evil incarnate (although George W Bush & his buddies are getting close).
So, it seems to me a cool-headed, thoughtful approach would be more fitting to your cause.
Second, Kos on Death:
I confess having mixed feelings about the civilians who were shot and burned in Fallujah.
I don't think it is a good or respectful thing to be a soldier of fortune. I also don't think the way Iraqis are treating those killed in action conforms to their own religion. Especially, since some of those civilians are just people who are there under duress (thanks to Bush's anti-worker economy).
I definitely feel sympathy for the families of the deceased. I don't know what I should think or feel about the individual cases, because I don't know enough about each of those killed. It is a very individual matter.
On the other hand, I feel even more anger toward the Administration war hawks who have brought about this dire situation. I spent a lot of time, and finger and lung power, explaining to everyone in sight why the Conquest of Iraq wasn't a good idea. What is happening is just what I and many others warned about.
On balance, I have kept my opinion about the killings to myself because I don't see any clear black and white in this situation. I feel Americans should see clearly just who is condemning who to death.
So, I think you should apologize for your intemperate remark, and redirect your views to the families concerned. In saying this, I understand fully where you are "coming from" as you explained.
It was a mistake to make the explanation long and detailed. I think a short reply and apology - then silence! - would have been appropriate.
Since WSJ has picked up this story (they love it!), the appropriate forum for wiggling out is a LETTER to WSJ. Feel free to ask for counsel before sending it.
Third, about Kerry:
While you and DailyKos are pushing Democrats for election in the Fall, maybe it is appropriate to be reasonably INDEPENDENT.
Of course, it is easy for me to say this, as I de-registered from the Democratic Party and try to "rise above the fray." It is all too easy to get swept away in the hustings by one extreme emotion or another.
I don't take exception to the thought behind your criticisms of Kerry. I am very worried that the Kerry campaign is fast slipping away from what we wanted it to be. So, someone has to be the political cop - always an unpleasant job.
What I suggest is that you phrase your criticisms in a more standard manner. Adopt the rules of the Senate: be civil. That guy on your right trying to kill you is your "friend." We all know the irony of that. That is how you can make your point, and retain your credibility.
I think you must consider the good of DAILYKOS and Kossacks, and not just how good it feels. That's the penalty for being a leader.
I hope this helps, but I put on my Kevlar vest and flameproof suit before pressing "submit."