Daily Kos

Winning the House, starting with WA-08

Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 09:22:31 AM PDT

Over a week ago, I attended a fundraiser with our leader in the House, Nancy Pelosi, and she noted to the assembled crowd a couple of facts which are extremely important to how we approach taking back our government.

The first fact is this: we need only 15 incremental seats to control the House of Representatives.

Those 15 seats change everything about the dynamic of the federal government; they allow us to stop the right-wing machine that's destroying every semblance of effective and fair government in this country.

The second fact is that every list of 15 seats we can take includes Washington's 8th Congressional District (now represented by GOP Rep. Dave Reichert).

Those two facts are of interest very broadly: even if you don't live in Washington's 8th, you can affect the outcome of the race, and it's of critical national importance.

They are, in addition, of particular interest to me, because I am running for that seat and because I have empirical data now that shows that it is possible for me to win it.

Let's start with a little bit about the district, and then talk about why it can be won.

The 8th is a suburban and rural district to the east of Seattle, from the northern suburbs that include part of the Microsoft campus and many of its employees, running south through suburban areas that have been disproportionately hit by Boeing layoffs and rural areas that include Mt. Rainier National Park.

It is the last of Seattle's close-in districts to be sending a Republican to Congress: Seattle's 7th is held by Rep. Jim McDermott (D), the 1st north of Seattle is home to Rep. Jay Inslee (D), and the 9th south of Seattle is home to Rep. Adam Smith (D).

The 8th has never sent a Democrat to Congress - but voted overwhelmingly in 2004 for Sen. Patty Murray (D), sends 50% Democrats to the state legislature, and is a district that was won by both Al Gore in 2000 and John Kerry in 2004.

In 2004, with an open seat (incumbent Jennifer Dunn was retiring), Dave Reichert (R) defeated Dave Ross (D) 51% v. 47%.

Dave Reichert is the former King County sheriff who had both caught the Green River killer and who possessed a reputation for moderation.

Dave Ross is a popular radio talk show host who entered the race quite late.

Across the district Dave Ross did worse than the other Democrats on the ticket: there were so many voters who voted a President: Kerry (D)/Senate: Murray (D)/House: Reichert (R) ticket that convincing only those voters to vote for the Democratic candidate for the 8th is enough to win the seat in 2006.

Because at the end of the day this plays out as a numbers game where they count up the votes to determine the winner (sometimes excruciatingly as we learned in our recent gubernatorial election), let's look at the numbers.

In November 2006, there are likely to be about 440,000 registered voters in the 8th.

Of those, roughly 62% are likely to turn out: that's how many turned out in the last off-year election in which a senate seat was on the ticket, as it will be here with Maria Cantwell's seat.

So we can expect on the order of 273,000 votes to be cast in this race. About 40% of the district is the Repubican base, and about 40% is the Democratic base: that's roughly 109,000 votes on each side.

The remaining 55,000 independent voters determine the outcome of this election. Getting 55% of their vote provides for a comfortable margin of victory: shoot for 30,000.

In 2004, Ross got only 39% of the swing vote in the district; Reichert got 57%. (The Libertarian candidate, Spencer Garrett, got the remaining 9%.)

So what makes me think that I can win that 30,000 of the 55,000 swing voters?

We just did a poll in the district that shows what many of you already know: there is a building backlash against the Republicans.

In the 8th, 69% of likely voters said that they disapproved of the current Republican-controlled Congress.

64% disapproved of the Bush administration. And only 34% would vote to re-elect Reichert. (To give you a sense: a normal number for a first-term incumbent would be in the low fifties.)

Furthermore, while likely voters in the 8th would choose Reichert over a generic Democratic candidate 45% to 21%, when presented with just a little information about me, they choose me at 41% to Reichert's 31%.

Darcy Burner for Congress

My blue collar, military family background, my history of pulling myself up by my bootstraps, my success in working my way through college (working full-time while at Harvard, in addition to maxing out my student loans, in order to have the opportunity to attend) and being a successful executive (at Microsoft, among other tech companies), and my commitment to ensuring that people and families who work hard and play by the rules get a fair chance - those things resonate across the whole district, including the parts that Dave Ross badly lost.

I trigger a politician frame the people of the 8th are already familiar with and overwhelmingly love: the successful mom-in-tennis-shoes, a role created here by Patty Murray.

The combination of the backlash, my fit for the district, and the hard, smart work we're doing to make this an extremely well-run campaign are going to win us this district - one of the fifteen we need to take back the House.

I strongly believe that with hard work, we can take back Washington's 8th Congressional District and unseat Dave Reichert.

I am ready to run a strong campaign to win. I am a candidate who recognizes the incredible work all of you are doing: you're building communities that make our voices stronger.

There are many candidates out there who don't think much of the power of bloggers and the netroots' ability to create change. I am not one of those candidates.

I am excited that so much is being done, both nationally and locally here in Washington State and the Pacific Northwest, to create a more powerful, united community of progressive activists.

We're laying some of the groundwork now for 2006. This is our opportunity to take back our country. I invite you to learn more about my candidacy by visiting my website.

From my website, you can learn more about who I am, opportunities for volunteering if you are interested, and Dave Reichert's record.

By participating here on Daily Kos and elsewhere, you and so many others reflect a deep desire to change this country for the better. I share your sentiment for progressive change and I look forward to helping make it a reality.

Tags: WA-08 (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 76 comments

  •  I'd love to hear your feedback (4.00 / 25)

    I will be reading this thread; I look forward to hearing what everyone has to say.
    •  I'm glad you're running, Darcy... (none / 0)

      The 8th District needs a progressive voice. You can be that voice!
    •  "there is a building backlash against -- (none / 1)

      the Republicans."  This is known, on the ground.  Use it as the baseline and never doubt it.

      It's the same as the feelings about the economy -- "experts" can tell you reams of theory about how good it looks, but ask almost any man/woman on the street and they will tell you it sucks.  No one feels secure in these times and they have no confidence in this government.  

      For some time now, I have believed that it is entirely possible to wrest not only the House but the Senate from the GOP.  The neocons have effectively killed the conservative movement.  The GOP is now known as the party of greed, waste, lies, corruption and incompetence.  

      What is important is for any challenger to NOT ACT like GOP-LITE.  Be a liberal, a progressive and stand up and tell us what liberalism can do.  

      "There's been a little complication with my complication"

      by dash888 on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 10:36:30 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Civil Air Patrol! Don't forget Civil Air Patrol! (none / 0)

      It bolsters your "Capable Woman" persona, plays well in wide open spaces, and helps counterbalance Reichert's Eagle Scout image/credential.

      The Great Obama might saw the lady in half, but he won't make the elephant disappear. The Confluence

      by RonK Seattle on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 12:55:00 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  I'd like to know your positions on: (none / 0)

      -Recent bankruptcy bill: would you have supported it...and if elected and in your campaign how do you plan to deal with the overwhelming influence of the business lobbies?

      -Trade: free trader or fair trader...and how would you define fair trade

      -WTO: what reforms do you support, if any or do you support a withdrawal?

      -Living Wage: would you support a living wage both nationally and internationally?

      -Affirmative action: do you support it?  why or why not, and if so in what form?

      Additionally, if elected, what specific goals do you hope to accomplish in your first term?  And what is your vision of government?

      Thanks

      -Hope never cost Corporate America a dime -Somebody blow Bush so we can impeach him already.

      by DWCG on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 02:48:20 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Wonderful Diary (none / 0)

    Very Detailed and well linked....Recommended....It sounds like your someone that can get a seat back fro Democrats....as you may know Dailykos is a very progressive site, how would you describe yourself on most issues...
  •  Best of luck to you! (none / 0)

    I walked some precincts in WA-08 last fall, mostly in the Renton/Newcastle area. I found that the more folks I talked to, the more they were uneasy with the Congressional Republicans, the less they were inclined to vote for Reichert (who, I'm convinced, only won because he was King County Sheriff).

    So I think your approach is precisely the one we need. You seem to have the research done, and a strong vision for the eastern regions of the county. If I'm still around in late summer/fall 2006, I'd be more than happy to help out however I can.

    I'm not part of a redneck agenda - Green Day
    Neither is California High Speed Rail

    by eugene on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 09:27:35 AM PDT

  •  live blog (none / 0)

    A few weeks ago when Angie Paccione announced her challenge to Marilyn Musgrave CO-4, unbossed hosted a live blogging session. It was well atttended.

    Consider asking em dash (em at unbossed dot com) if you are interested or a local WA blog.

    Tomorrow on UB I am also putting up a post on a rural electoral strategy. It builds on the observations I made during a trip on back roads in rural parts of Red States. Some might also be relevant to other campaigns.

  •  Welcome Aboard (4.00 / 2)

    Darcy,

    I remember meeting you at Camp Wellstone in June.  It looks like you've put together a well-thought out campaign.  I like the notion of "practical progressive" although I do think our collective new-progressive political thinking has that built in.  I think you would be well served to get the emerging progessive infrastructure to support you, i.e. Progressive Majority and the www.nwportal.org community.  I think your district would support that and, as we learned at Camp Wellstone, it would help foster the growth of our progressive grassroots.

    I think that progressives in the Northwest could pull off an "Internet Primary" prior to the 2006 races and come together to support our desired candidates just as the national blogsphere is likely to do at the national level.  

    We can do better. Together we will.

    by nudger on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 09:42:26 AM PDT

    •  agreed (none / 1)

      I like the notion of "practical progressive" although I do think our collective new-progressive political thinking has that built in.

      Agreed... but I think putting the word "practical" right in the label helps emphasize it. It's also got that alliteration thing going for it :)

      conscietious objector in the battle of the sexes

      by plymouth on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 09:59:39 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  I'm echoing the call (none / 0)

      for you to work with PMajority and ingratiate yourself into the larger Northwest progressive community. I'm in OR, and at this stage there don't appear to be any highly competitive races at the federal level. That could be to your gain, if you can engage interest in the race.

      I'm a cofounder of Also Also, part of the NWPortal, and I'd like to contact you about a possible interview to help boost your visibility. You can find me via alsoalso.also (at) gmail (dot) com.

      I happen to know an old friend of yours as well, by the way. He turned me on to your candidacy a couple months ago, and based on that I asked Goldy and Andrew about you. They've all got very good things to say. You have my support, for what it's worth!

      TJ

    •  Camp Wellstone is grrrrreat!!! (none / 0)

      I went twice - Kansas City and St. Louis - and found it to be very informative (terrific resource notebook) and motivating.  You get a four from a fellow "camper"!
    •  I was there too (none / 0)

      I'm excited about this campaign, and I think it's clear from having observed Randy Gordon a time or two that he doesn't have a very personable style of campaigning.  I'm currently out of town at school, but I live in the 9th and can't wait to knock on as many doors for you as I can.  Way to go.
    •  The progressive community is quite important (none / 0)

      ...and I agree with the wisdom of reaching out to them, which I am certainly doing. I even completely agree with the specific suggestions of Progressive Majority and the NWPortal.org folks, though I would add to the list Democracy for America/Democracy for Washington. (I have heard rumours that MoveOn is doing good work in the district, but we are not allowed to work together directly due to campaign finance laws.)
  •  I'm in the district too (none / 0)

    I'll be reading your stuff and in touch.I also having been hearing real questioning of the GOP here. Reichart not really heard from but OK by them. The national GOP is losing support, between Terry Sciavo, Social Secirity, and emergency response (eathquakes!)so there is some leverage to work with.
    I was going to run myself because I need a job but looks like you got me beat, lol.  
  •  i was amazed (none / 0)

    to see the number of kerry lawn signs in mercer island (of all places) in 2004. the times they are a changing, and it's heartening to see someone step up to the plate. wa-8 is definitely winnable. best of luck.

    surf putah, your friendly neighborhood central valley samizdat

    by wu ming on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 09:49:51 AM PDT

  •  Good luck from Carnation... (none / 1)

    I glanced over your website and I think you need to emphasize Reichert's vote against cracking down on war profiteering, among other votes.

    Here are more details:

    http://betterdonkey.org/node/462

    Also, stop referring to him as the guy who caught the Green River killer.  He repeatedly let Ridgeway go and even harrassed an innocent man who later sued the Police department.

    Reichert just happened to be King County Sheriff when DNA technology caught up to Ridgeway.  (sorry, this is a pet peeve of mine).

    I'm not saying you should bring any of this up, just don't give him the credit he doesn't deserve...

    Good luck!

    I'm sad the goat just died today - the Frogs

    by Burnplant on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 10:01:51 AM PDT

  •  Good Luck (none / 0)

    Reichert seems especially vulnerable, since that district regularly votes Democrat for president and senate.  And those re-elect numbers are dangerously low, even for a first-termer.  I always predicted that one day we'd finally win that void in King County that's surrpunded on 3 sides by Democrats, and it looks like 2006 might finally be our day.

    I have to admit, 2006 is looking more promising all the time.

    All your vote are belong to us.

    by Harkov311 on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 10:06:04 AM PDT

  •  Darcy, (4.00 / 5)

    I would love to see the district go blue, and I would love to see another tech-savvy Democrat on the hill, especially one who describes herself as a practical progressive, depending on what that means.

    A couple of questions for you, as I cannot seem to find a lot of policy-specific info on your website (I know, it's early in the campaign...)

    1. You are a former Microsoft employee. Would you describe yourself as corporate-friendly?
    2. What is your position on CAFTA?
    3. What is your position on intellectual property rights, especially regarding the Digital Milennium Copyright Act, extension of copyright laws, and software patents?
    •  As another ex-Microserf (none / 0)

      I would have to see clear, straight answers to these questions as well.

      Seattle Transit Blog http://seatrans.blogspot.com

      by Bensch on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 12:38:54 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Answers to questions (none / 1)

      1. Would I describe myself as corporate-friendly?

      I am people-focused as a first priority.  Corporate activities that are bad for people are bad.  Too many of the current officeholders have lost sight of that prioritization, benefitting corporations that are behaving badly at the expense of the rest of us.  

      But corporations also create jobs, provide services, and make things that we buy and use -- all of which we want them to be successful doing, so long as their methods are people-friendly.  In the 8th, for instance, both Costco and Microsoft are excellent corporate citizens who treat their employees, customers, communities, and shareholders well.  We can and should encourage such behavior.  

      So I would describe myself as very friendly to corporations that are good citizens, and strongly opposed to corporate polcies and activities that benefit the corporation at everyone else's expense.

      1.  Trade is both a good thing and an inevitable effect of increasing globalization; we should take advantage the opportunities presented by our market power to ensure that the trade agreements we make are a rising tide that lift all boats, rather than bringing everyone's standard of living to the lowest common denominator.  In particular, environmental regulation and labor rights only work if they are essentially universal throughout the areas of free trade.  CAFTA was fatally flawed with respect to those areas; I would press for a better agreement. (As Washington in particular is heavily dependent on trade, an agreement is in general a good thing -- but the details matter.)

      2.  IP is definitely one of the areas where the policy is struggling to keep up with the technology, and there's a tremendous amount of inefficiency as a result.  I think that the big challenge is balancing protection for the creators of IP -- which is a good thing -- with fair use for the public -- which is also a good thing -- while stamping out abuse on both sides.  

      We do want good protection that allows the creators of IP to put a roof over their heads and food on their tables, to build companies that bring us innovative products and services, and to entertain with fair compensation.  (I'm perfectly fine with people who do such work without compensation, too, but compensation has to be part of the mix for most people.)  So good IP laws, well-enforced, are a good thing.  

      But the second part of the equation is that there's a societal trade that takes place: those protections are for a limited time, and allow for fair use for many kinds of IP.  My friend Brewster Kahle is working to put a whole bunch of public domain material onto the Internet to make it available to a much broader audience than can access it now; he is extremely frustrated with the extensions of copyright that grant essentially perpetual protection to everything currently under copyright, long after the deaths of the creators.  That's not the deal.  (Even the Constitution specifies the protection is to be for a limited term.)  

      We've seen areas where we've gone beyond what's reasonable with respect to copyright terms and with respect to granting patents that are clearly absurd -- prior art, or things that are stunningly obvious.  We need to ferret out those abuses.  But we also need to make sure that companies and individuals whose labor creates things have the means necessary to protect their intellectual property, and that government acts as a fair arbiter for both sides.

      •  Thanks for the thoughtful answers. (none / 0)

        So many candidates send a surrogate to start a diary here, and then run without answering.

        I appreciate the tightrope you're walking on these complex issues. The concept of government as unbiased arbiter is one that is lacking right now. Too many progressive legislators that are nearly always on the side of the public good become corporate shills on the issues of intellectual property (I'm talking about you, Waxman and Boxer!)

        I am worried that the frantic copyrighting and patenting going on by media and software corps is sometimes specifically aimed at making grassroots art, music and media inherently illegal. Especially when combined with DRM and the DMCA.

        Keep posting here. As a former (and future) Seattle area geek, I want to hear how your candidacy develops, and would also consider volunteering next year.

  •  A Question (none / 1)

    First of all, best of luck to you in the race.

    I see from your website that you spent summers in your childhood in nearby Thurston and Lewis counties, but isn't it likely that you might be criticized for only "recently" moving to Washington State?  Having only been a state resident since 1998, if Reichert (or your opponent in the primary) tries to make an issue of this, how would you respond?  Perhaps I'm overly concerned about this, but it seems that some politicians are often able to implicitly criticize their opponents for not having lived in the district long enough to "properly understand our problems and concerns".  Presumably, this would be less of a factor for suburban and exurban areas, but I imagine that this will come up at some point.

    I don't want to seem like I'm throwing cold water here -- I ask this because I'm well outside your district (NYC, to be exact) and have little sense of how voters in WA-8 might react.  People can get awfully parochial when pressed.

    In terms of your campaign, I like the way you've structured the core concepts on your home page.  I would strongly recommend that you build everything (both online and on the campaign trail) around those three:  Opportunity, Liberty, Equality.  Each specific issue you raise should be seen as an organic outgrowth of these.  It creates the idea of a unifying theme.

    I hope to be able to help out in whatever fashion I can over the next year.  Again, good luck!

    Can you smell the Constitution burning?

    by The Maven on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 10:12:40 AM PDT

    •  not sure that's a big issue (none / 0)

      We have enough people who come from elsewhere that living here for the past 7 years is practically a native.  It might be a bigger issue in the smaller commumities of the district but they'll be more concerned over any urban/ Microsoft bias.
  •  Glad you are running (none / 0)

    I will be watching with interest.
    This is a seat that should be ours.
    Go get it.

    Buy my book! The Servant of the Manthycore by Michael Ehart, foreword by Michael Moorcock http://www.mehart.blogspot.com/

    by IsraelHand on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 10:20:22 AM PDT

  •  Birth Tax (none / 0)

    I liked how your web page starts out:

    In the land of opportunity, people who work hard and play by the rules should be rewarded.

    It reminds one of the "practical progressive" Clinton who turned debt as far as the eye could see to a surplus.

    It is not practical for a child born in America today to start out with a $26,000 debt from the national debt or the $1,000 / year interest cost that has been placed upon that child and every American by your opponent.

    Good luck.

    "A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual doom." - MLK, jr

    by NCJim on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 10:28:01 AM PDT

  •  One More Thing (none / 0)

    On the web, don't just ask for money.

    Ask for money for some specific thing.

    Like please help me raise $50,000 to put up a billboard, or $50,000 to support canvassers.

    Supporters will want a sense of ownership in your campaign.

    And ... oh ya ... bats are good.

    "A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual doom." - MLK, jr

    by NCJim on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 10:33:07 AM PDT

  •  not picking sides (none / 0)

    I do want to point out that there's another Democrat running in WA-8.  As best I can tell, Randy Gordon has been on the campaign trail somewhat longer than Darcy.

    As a resident of WA-7 and an active participant in the 2005 electoral season (County Executive, County Council, Mayor, half of City Council, half of Port Commission, half of School Board), I haven't yet begun to pay deep attention to the Eastside congressional race.  So I can't say who strikes my fancy between Gordon and Burner.  

    I'm just hoping that we don't have a repeat of 2004, when the state party ham-handedly shoved Ross into the race at the last minute.  Not to say that Alben or Behrens-Behrendt could have won, but either (especially Alben IMHO) would have been a more credible presence against Reichert.

    The way to win is not to move to the right wing; the way to win is to move to the right policy. -- Nameless Soldier

    by N in Seattle on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 10:34:59 AM PDT

    •  I keep bringing this up, but (none / 0)

      there is possibly a third candidate, who would have a lot of party support (and mine).  We should know for sure by the time we have our seattle kos gathering thingee on the 8th of October (you Washington Kossacks can find out more here.), so we should discuss this in addition to the local blog thing that we were supposed to discuss this weekend...
      •  Darcy already has a lot of support.... (none / 0)

        And is in this to win. Another Dave Ross style-entry into the race would not be welcome.
        •  Not all new entries (none / 1)

          are Dave Ross style entries.  A worthy candidate is a worthy candidate, and as the party EXISTS to recruit and support candidates, they should be able to do so.  Note the recruit part of that - the party is not obligated to support candidates in a primary that they didn't recruit.  Neither Darcy nor Randy would be betrayed, as Alex Alben was, with the entry of a party-supported candidate, because neither of them was recruited by the party to run.  

          That said, I don't doubt Darcy is in it to win.  If she wasn't in it to win, I think we'd all be angry that she was wasting our time!  

          I do doubt that she has a lot of support, because she has no name recognition.  I live in the 8th, and very, very few people know who the heck she is.  Support outside the district doesn't win votes.  (Randy Gordon faces the same problem, despite months on the trail so far)  Darcy seems very nice, very smart, and very determined.  I like her.  She's not the candidate I'd like to see in this particular race, nor is Randy, but I'd love to see her run for state legislature.  

          •  What do you mean by "party supported"? (none / 0)

            You mean supported by insiders, or the establishment? Because Darcy has been earning support from local Democratic organizations. That's where it counts. People like Paul Berendt should not be in the business of anointing candidates. No matter how early in the campaign it is.
            •  Why not? (none / 1)

              It's what the party is for.  Local party organizations, ESPECIALLY in the 8th, will put support wherever they can right now.  Should a third candidate get in, they'll get support as well.  

              And when I say party supported, you bet I'm talking about DNC/state Party.  They exist to recruit and support candidates.  Not only should Paul Behrendt be in that business, it's his only job.  Should Darcy or Randy or someone else win the primary, the party will support them.  It'd be nice if the party would support whoever wants to run as a Democrat, but the Party is very concerned with winning, and will sometimes choose not to support a candidate they didn't recruit (and to see why that's a good thing, see Tim Sheldon)

              I'm getting hostility from you towards the party, when the party is doing its job.  The Dave Ross thing was actually a VERY good decision (not everyone agrees about that, a' course), but was very poorly handled.  Hostility isn't going to get the party interested in listening to you.  Meet with Paul and make your case; it isn't hard to get a meeting with him.  

              And really, folks making up their mind that Darcy is the candidate and the party shouldn't bring in their own candidate are doing the exact same thing - trying to anoint a candidate.  It's what we all want to do; clear the table for our favorite, and human nature is to assume that "whoever you're bringing in after I've made my choice is not nearly as good as my choice".  

              Darcy does not have a lot of support.  Neither does Randy, nor anyone else.  It should be reasonable for all of us to bring our own fave candidates to the table, and it should be reasonable for the party to bring it's own candidate to the table.  If you think the party should butt out now that you've made your choice, well, you have to get over it.  You have no more right to make the party's choice than they have to make yours.  

              •  Look... (none / 0)

                Did you go to the "grassroots campaign brainstorming session" for the 7th a few months ago? It was in the basement of Town Hall. Berendt and his hired consultant insulted everyone's intelligence repeatedly and made fools of themselves. I'm really not a fan of the guy because of what I've seen whenever I meet him.

                Seattle Transit Blog http://seatrans.blogspot.com

                by Bensch on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 12:50:47 PM PDT

                [ Parent ]

        •  And now is the time (none / 1)

          for folks to be entering the race. I wouldn't say that anyone who hops in now for a November 2006 race is "late". They're just not "early".

          Call me crazy, but I think a contested primary between two or three smart, progressive candidates is just what we need in the 8th.

          It was all so easy in 2004 when I was for Howard Dean.

          by el ganador on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 12:02:15 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

  •  how very interesting... (none / 0)

    i just found out i'm in the 8th (moved in with the gf).. so once i get her to register that'll be two more votes that a dem can probably count on (depending on whether or not they've earned my vote).

    You can lead an elephant to water but you can't make 'em think.

    by bill in wa on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 10:39:28 AM PDT

  •  Mrs. Burner (none / 0)

    I'm sure you already know this, but your competition voted against an independent inquiry into the lethal federal failings after Katrina, and voted yes to the whitewash administration self-investigation.

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002502893_rollcall18.html

    It's hard to tie individual Congressmen to the ineptitude of the lethal Katrina response.  We all know that the culture of corruption and the self-serving GOP machine is at fault for the looting and dismantling of an effective federal government.

    These but these two votes make that connection.  Reichert is complicit in a cover-up of the most despicable kind.

    I'm no politician (I'm way too hyperbolic), but it seems to me that Washington would be better served by someone who wants to find out why our federal government suffered a complete meltdown in the face of such a disaster.  After all, Al Qaeda has promised more attacks and we need robust and efficient security.  Americans need a leader who is willing to vet the causes of our failure, and replace the weak links.  It's time to let the grown-ups take over, it is not time to cover up ineptitude because you lack the moral courage to disagree with your ideological peers.

    Why?  Because this could happen again at any moment.

    Loyalty to a political party is one value, keeping people in Washington safe is another value.  Your opponent chose his loyalty to his political party over the safety of his constituents.  He should be ashamed of himself.

    Good luck, we need you in Congress!

    All the war-propaganda, all the screaming and lies and hatred, comes invariably from people who are not fighting. - George Orwell

    by Five of Diamonds on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 10:50:22 AM PDT

  •  I live in the 7th (none / 0)

    and am active in 36th LD Dem politics, and commute to the Eastside every day for work. I'd be happy to help in any way I can.

    In fact....I'll go sign up on your site right now... [g]

    It was all so easy in 2004 when I was for Howard Dean.

    by el ganador on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 11:06:24 AM PDT

  •  your website's great (none / 0)

    but there's a couple of typos in the "About Darcy" page. You might want to correct those :)

    What's madness but nobility of the soul at odds with circumstance?

    by slinkerwink on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 11:08:39 AM PDT

  •  Go Get 'Em (none / 0)

    I don't live in Washington State, but have a lot of family up there.  In fact, my parents live in Snoqualime, which I believe is in your district.  They are lifelong Dems, but I am going to talk to them and ask them to get active in your campaign.  Also, I agree with the post regarding your opponents reputation in the Green River murders.  This has been a subject of interest to me for years.  The investigation has to have been one of the most botched, mishandled cases in history.  The killer should have been caught years earlier.  Give no credit to Riechart for the capture, and if he runs on the issue, hammer him.
    •  Send your parents my way (none / 0)

      Snoqualmie is in the 8th CD, and I'm on the board of their legislative district.  (I live in North Bend, just east of Snoqualmie)  We'd love to be in touch with more good dems; it's a tough district.  click my name to get the email addy if you're interested.
  •  People need to be convinced... (none / 0)

    ...that your inexperience is not going to be an issue.  Reichert is a known quantity, and he now has a voting record that must be exploited.  But you need to prove yourself as the true voice of the 8th.

    Good luck, and keep growing the grassroots via the Web and blogosphere.

    On The Road To 2008: Commentary on issues as we countdown to the next opportunity to change the direction of America

    by Daniel K on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 11:30:07 AM PDT

    •  Reicherts Experience? (none / 0)

      I'm sure that Darcy's experience will be questioned.  Dave Reichert did have experience, as King County Sheriff.  

      But Dave Reichert has lost all credibility and can't really use any argument of his experience against Darcy becuase all he does is vote as he is told by Delay.  In effect, all his congressional experience is as a mingnon of Delays.  Thats not experience.  So I think Darcy can easily defend herself in that area.  So every time Reichert bring up his experience, it is an invitation for Darcy to highlight that he hasn't demonstrated any leadership.

      Hopefully, the Abramoff investigation will also bring down Delay, and in turn, seriously hurt Reichert, who is on Delays TRMPAC payroll.

      Darch needs to get out and make it clear that she will represent Washington's East Side, not Sugarland Texas, as Reichert does.

  •  What differentiates you from (none / 1)

    Randy Gordon who is also running for this seat?  

    Just wondering.

    •  I live in the 8th (none / 0)

      and that is also my question.  Why are you better suited to represent the 8th than Randy?

      Also, could whoever it is that keeps mentioning the possibility of a 3rd contender stop being coy and tell us what you know?

      Reichert is vulnerable for all the reasons you've named, and because he's been a finger in the wind kinda guy . . . he made the mistake of holding one of those goofy Social Security meetings last fall and got confronted with a roomful of pissed off constituents.  Haven't heard zip about it since.  

      The one thing he can point to as evidence that Bush isn't his favorite uncle is his vote against the Schiavo midnight express bill--the rest of the time, it's whatever Rove tells him to do.  They're worried about him, I know, because they just gave him a seat on the Homeland Security Committee.  I'd love, love, love to see him sent home, and will definitely work hard to help make that happen.

      Oh--and he's also against stem cell research, which I know is popular nationwide and in the 8th.  He needs to go.

    •  I have the same question (none / 0)

      I'm quite eager to support a democrat for the 8th, Reichert absolutely has to go.  Riechert is just a puppet as far as I can see, and his every vote is the same as Delays.

      But why should I chose you over Randy? Right now I have no preference, and I had thought that some consensus would have emerged on who is the better candidate.  Due to Randy's background, it would appear that he might have some fund raising advantage in the trial lawyer area, but I don't know if there is actually any evidence of this.  

      My sense is the democratic candidate who starts campaigning first and most actively will win.  I had assumed that the Democratic Party would have chosen a candidate by now but that hasn't happened.  

      After all Howard Dean's 50 state strategy speeches, I was quite dissappointed to see no press for either candidate coming out of the DNC/DNCC.

      Although it may be more the medias fault rather than either yours or Randy's, I think you are both off to a rather weak start in terms of getting name recognition.  I had to do a lot of searching to find that both you and Randy were running, and have been able to find out little news of the progress on either of your campaigns.

      I think getting on to the dailyKOS is a great way to get some press, and hope you continue this.  There are a variety of bloggers who I'm sure will also be willing to help, but you need to give us something to work with.  

  •  Random (none / 0)

    I've spent a fair amount of time with Darcy (her younger sister is a good friend) and I will vouch for her being good people, in addition to advocating good policy ideas. Best of luck!
  •  Thanks for posting here (none / 0)

    It's wonderful to see so many congressmen, senators, and candidates talking to us.  I think it shows how the power of this site is growing. I wonder if the next President will announce their candidacy on Daily Kos? Wouldn't that be awesome?
  •  Born and raised in WA-08 (none / 0)

    While I no longer reside in Washington, most of my family still lives in district 8 and votes Democrat. I will tell them about you, Darcy, and encourage them to support you in the primary.

    Good luck!

  •  I Think You Look Like a Great Choice (none / 0)

    I thank you for posting on this site and hope other dems running for other seats do the same! We want to hear your voice and hopefully get some needed funds.  

    I live out in CA 48.  I have seen adds for a couple of Republicans running for Cox's old seat(they have been running away from the pres.) I truly believe that even in this strong republican district the decent is growing becoming more vocal.

    "Spell check helps, dyslexia still wins"

    by npbeachfun on Tue Sep 27, 2005 at 02:27:20 PM PDT

  •  don't have time (none / 0)

    to read thru all your comments so excuse me if this has been addressed. it would be helpful if you included an 'issue link' on your website that addressed your positions on a variety of issues. i live in seattle and look forward to following your campaign. thanks for dedicating your life to public service.
  •  8th District Ethnic Demographics (none / 0)

    Since 1990, the ethnic diversity of the 8th district has been increasing at a dramatic rate. The Asian population has increased from around 8,600 in 1990 to over 22,000 in 2005. The Latino increase during the same time has also tripled. Combined with other ethnic minorities, the 8th district is now more that 26% minority. That translates into a huge constituency for the Democratic party. The Republicans recently sent their RNC chair to Bellevue to court the Asian vote. While there is not a blanket loyalty to the Dems, Asians and other minorities still vote over 54% Democratic. Darcy Burner must engage in a year long dialogue with all facets of the increasingly diverse 8th district in order to build a winning coalition. The votes are there, and inclined. Now it the time to start making the case as to why Darcy Burner can represent their interests.

    MEDIATORIUM Examining Political Media and Public Perception

    by Templarist on Thu Oct 06, 2005 at 09:14:14 PM PDT

Permalink | 76 comments