It would seem ridiculous to say such a thing, but the evidence is quite compelling.
Freedom of religion - establishment clause: They've long opposed this one and favored the funding of Christian organizations with government funds, Christian prayers in Congress and schools, the translation of Biblical principles into law, etc. I'm not sure that conservatives have ever supported this one in any way.
Freedom of religion - prohibition clause: They've also pretty much always opposed this one as well. They have long attempted to limit the religious rights of people who didn't agree with them, whether it be non-Christians, atheists, agnostics or even other Christians who don't agree with them. Now the major focus is on denying rights to Muslims, although atheists and agnostics are still a popular target.
Freedom of speech: They support this one as long as you don't say anything critical of America in general or leaders from their party. Anti-Clinton? Okay. Anti-Bush? Sedition.
Freedom of the press: Again, the press is free to say whatever it wants unless it in any way criticizes or even questions conservative leaders. Making up lies about Democratic leaders is fine. In fact, if you don't report on their made up lies about Democrats, then you're in trouble. If you report on actual things that conservatives have done wrong -- even if they are true, 100% verifiable and confessed, you are still showing a "liberal" bias and they will come and get you.
Freedom to petition government for the redress of grievances: Again, perfectly acceptable if a Democrat is in office, but off limits if one of them is in office. When they are running the show, petitioning the government can get you fired, audited or arrested.
Freedom of assembly: Assembly is acceptable when the assembly has been pre-approved and the audience has been pre-screened. Other assemblies are not.
That about sums it up. Maybe next time I'll look at the rest of the Bill of Rights, although, the pattern is pretty much the same.