Skip to main content

This diary might have a fairly narrow appeal, so disregard it at your leisure. I thought I would put it up anyhow, because it's news, and it pertains to the politics of conflict resolution.

I just got back from the filming of this month's installation of "The Doha Debates" a series of debates held here that are broadcast by BBC World. Each month, a proposition is put forth in the form of a statement. Four panelists, moderated by Tim Sullivan, then debate the proposition and at the end the audience votes to accept or reject the proposal.

This month's proposal was "This House believes that the international community must accept Hamas as a political partner".

Now I don't usually like to talk about the Israel/Palestine thing. I mostly gave up spending breath on it years ago, convinced that nobody in charge is really acting in good faith.

I went anyhow tonight, because I wanted to see who was speaking (it's always a surprise), and because this proposal is about something much larger than the Israeli/Palestinian peace process. It's about a core aspect of conflict resolution... being willing to talk to your enemies.

First of all security was very tight, and no photos were allowed this time (sorry folks) except by the official press. There was a failed attempt at a suicide bombing across the border in Saudi a couple of days ago, and the security people have been extra vigilant ever since. One of the queens was in attendance as well, Sheikha Mozah, so they took extra care.

The debate was filmed before a live audience (that would be me!) and the panelists consisted of two Jews and two Muslims, with one member of each faith group arguing for and against the proposal. The panelists were two professors, a lawyer, and David Frum of the American Enterprise Institute, a former Bush speechwriter and neocon minor entity whose greatest contribution to civilization thus far has been to coin the phrase "Axis of Evil".

Frum of course argued against dealing with Hamas. He was actually pretty clever, though slippery. He got slammed hard a few times though, by both the other panelists and the crowd itself at question and answer time. I have to give the guy credit though... it was a tough topic and a tougher audience, but he showed up.

I wanted to bring this up here, because it's about conflict resolution. The proposal was about whether or not to accept Hamas as a legitimate political entity, now that they've won an election. So often on this particular issue and others, people are unwilling to even sit down and talk to the other side.

It's not about whether or not you agree with the other side, approve of them or trust them. It's about whether or not you'll sit down and talk to them, or work together on resolving differences. The premises presented against the proposal, based upon Hamas' known record of violence, failed to take into account the fact that they are the only game in town that counts. If you can't make peace with them, there will be no peace, period.

In any conflict, if we marginalize or ostracize those with whom we most disagree, not much progress can be made, because those are exactly the people with whom we need to be talking.

I won't get into all the arguments presented for and against, you can see it yourself on BBC World March 4th and 5th if you're so inclined. At the end the proposal passed by 88%(for) to 11% (against).

I met Frum afterward, and squabbled with him a little bit myself, but then I cracked a joke, made him laugh, shook his hand and sincerely thanked him for coming to face a tough crowd in the Gulf. I mean afterall, if you can't talk civilly with your enemies, then how can you expect to ever make progress towards peace?

Originally posted to mosesfreeman on Sun Feb 26, 2006 at 01:13 PM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site