Skip to main content

The Washington Post has a story out this Sunday about Rumsfeld's secret new strategic plans.  The WaPo story is  . . . let me put this delicately . . . hard to figure out.  It's full of contradictions; but the gist seems to be that Rummy wants to replace State Department authority with military authority, all over the globe:

Wasington Post, Sunday:

New Plans Foresee Fighting Terrorism Beyond War Zones
Pentagon to Rely on Special Operations

By Ann Scott Tyson
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, April 23, 2006; Page A01

Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld has approved the military's most ambitious plan yet to fight terrorism around the world and retaliate more rapidly and decisively in the case of another major terrorist attack on the United States, according to defense officials.

Stop.  Notice that phrasing: "retaliate . . . in case of another terrorist attack."  Later in the story, this is contradicted.  The plans include a lot more than that.

The long-awaited campaign plan for the global war on terrorism, as well as two subordinate plans also approved within the past month by Rumsfeld, are considered the Pentagon's highest priority, according to officials familiar with the three documents who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak about them publicly.

Details of the plans are secret, but in general they envision a significantly expanded role for the military -- and, in particular, a growing force of elite Special Operations troops -- in continuous operations to combat terrorism outside of war zones such as Iraq and Afghanistan. Developed over about three years by the Special Operations Command (SOCOM) in Tampa, the plans reflect a beefing up of the Pentagon's involvement in domains traditionally handled by the Central Intelligence Agency and the State Department.

So Rummy wants to flush the State Department.

For example, SOCOM has dispatched small teams of Army Green Berets and other Special Operations troops to U.S. embassies in about 20 countries in the Middle East, Asia, Africa and Latin America, where they do operational planning and intelligence gathering to enhance the ability to conduct military operations where the United States is not at war.

Now . . . . wait, wait, wait.  Did you catch the contradiction?  First, we are told that the plans "envision" further involvment by Special Forces in traditionally diplomatic arenas, THEN are told that Special Forces HAVE BEEN DISPATCHED to embassies for "intelligence gathering."

What the hell is going on here?

And in a subtle but important shift contained in a classified order last year, the Pentagon gained the leeway to inform -- rather than gain the approval of -- the U.S. ambassador before conducting military operations in a foreign country, according to several administration officials. "We do not need ambassador-level approval," said one defense official familiar with the order.

Next contradiction: "Last year, the Pentagon GAINED the leeway . . . "  These are not plans for the future.  This is what is happening now.

-- great big snip --

Special Operations Command, led by Gen. Doug Brown, has been building up its headquarters and writing the plans since 2003, when Rumsfeld first designated it as the lead command for the war on terrorism. Its budget has grown 60 percent since 2003 to $8 billion in fiscal 2007. President Bush empowered the *53,000-strong command with coordinating the entire military's efforts in counterterrorism in 2004.

Two points:

(1) Did Rumsfeld approve this, or did Bush?  The article says both.

(2) At this point, we can probably agree that "counterterrorism" is a euphamism for ALL military strategey.  Which is starting to include all diplomatic strategy.

"SOCOM is, in fact, in charge of the global war on terror," Brown said in testimony before the House last month. In this role, SOCOM directs and coordinates actions by the military's regional combatant commands. SOCOM, if directed, can also command its own counterterrorist operations -- such as when a threat spans regional boundaries or the mission is highly sensitive -- but it has not done so yet, according to Olson, and other officials say that is likely to be the exception to the rule.

To extend its reach to more countries, SOCOM is increasing by 13,000 the number of Special Operations troops, including Special Forces soldiers skilled in language and working with indigenous militaries, and Delta Force operatives and Navy SEAL teams that form clandestine "special mission units" engaged in reconnaissance, intelligence gathering and man-hunting. Already, SOCOM is seeing its biggest deployments in history, with 7,000 troops overseas today, but the majority have been concentrated in Iraq and Afghanistan, with 85 percent last year in the Middle East, Central Asia or the Horn of Africa.

Is it just me, or does 7,000 + 13,000 strike you as a HELL OF A LOT of "man-hunting"?  Apparently, much of this is targeted at other areas of the world.

-- Snipping --

We're told that The State Department and SOCOM are in a state of tension about lines of authority.  I can only imagine.

State Department officials, meanwhile, said that although, for the most part, cooperation with the military teams has been good, they remain concerned over continued "gray areas" regarding their status. "Special Ops wants the flexibility and speed to go in there. . . . but there's understandably questions of how you do that and how you have clear lines of authority," one U.S. official said. There remains "continuing discussion, to put it politely, in terms of how this is going to work," the official said. SOCOM says the teams work for the regional commanders.

Again, this story is full of ambiguity . . . . but the main thrust seems to be Rumsfeld taking over control of "diplomatic authority" and replacing it with military force, all over the world.

Originally posted to LithiumCola on Sat Apr 22, 2006 at 09:18 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Leslie in CA, Bob Johnson, Kimberley, reef the dog, Laura Clawson, hannah, Alexa, TealVeal, teacherken, laurak, Rita in DC, glitterscale, lipris, Gooserock, emal, Winger, gorlim, JTML, Emerson, littlesky, Shockwave, DFWmom, WI Deadhead, frisco, TampaProgressive, HL Mungo, Poika, hubcap, Creosote, silence, Paulie200, bronte17, Joe Sixpack, srkp23, LickBush, peraspera, freepress4all, cognitive dissonance, arkdem, Cedwyn, litigatormom, rentogen, Janet Strange, Barbara Morrill, Dallasdoc, jlynne, stirringstill, GN1927, Stymnus, dnn, Court Jester, tombstone, lcrp, Rxtr2, walkshills, AllisonInSeattle, KateCrashes, mattes, smartgo, Man Eegee, Clzwld, CanYouBeAngryAndStillDream, Deward Hastings, Marianne Benz, bablhous, rickeagle, kd texan, BigBite, rockmoonwater, noelschutz, We hold these truths, Gowrie Gal, ukiyo, Skennet Boch, bloomer 101, DCleviathan, bellevie, Elise, coloradobl, seesdifferent, archibaldtuttle, LisaZ, KnotIookin, Alien Abductee, rjo, ChemBob, Ranting Roland, teresab, lennysfo, dansk47, jorndorff, GreyHawk, Overseas, wgard, wiscmass, bartman, Brian B, Gjermund E Jansen, Spathiphyllum, JPete, melvin, OldCoastie, RainyDay, bently, coffeeinamrica, kubla000, RoseRash, taracar, occams hatchet, mrd in nyc, Sanuk, Nightprowlkitty, Compound F, bee tzu, PatsBard, Kingsmeg, testvet6778, BlueInARedState, Arabiflora, Yellow Canary, mooshter, spoon or no spoon, KenBee, theyrereal, SherriG, Silent Lurker, everhopeful, MO Blue, Unitary Moonbat, kurt, betterdeadthanred, DanC, Darrell J Gahm, Snarcalita, procera, jabu, Bhishma

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site