Skip to main content

Cross-posted from Free Exchange on Campus.

University of Akron Professors John F. Zipp (professor and Chair of the Department of Sociology) and Rudy Fenwick (associate professor of Sociology and Chair of the University of Akron Faculty Senate), have just released a new study examining the question of the "political bias" of faculty in higher education.  The study, published in Public Opinion Quarterly, is entitled Is the Academy a Liberal Hegemony? The Political Orientations and Educational Values of Professors.  We recently got to a chance to ask professors Zipp and Fenwick about the study.

Interview with Professors Zipp and Fenwick 


FE:  Thanks for taking some time to talk about your recent project.  Can you tell us a little bit about what you set out to examine with your research and why you decided to take on this project?


JZ and RF: There were a series of events in late 2004 and early 2005 that led us to pursue this research. It started with George Will's op-ed piece in November 2004, Academia, Stuck to the Left, claiming that faculty were this liberal monolith threatening traditional academic freedom in American higher education by imposing their view on colleagues and students. A few days after Will's piece appeared our university president mentioned it to an arts and science faculty meeting as one of many attacks on higher education. After that meeting we were talking about Will's piece and how, in our many years in higher ed, we had not experienced anything close to a liberal monolith- and we're in sociology, supposedly one of the most liberal outposts of academe!

We remembered that in the 1990s two sociologists (Richard Hamilton and Lowell Hargens) published an article that used Carnegie Institute surveys on faculty attitudes/values and found that between the late 1960s and the 1980s faculty had actually become less, not more, liberal. Because their article was published in 1993, the last Carnegie survey they examined was 1984. We also knew that there were more recent Carnegie surveys- in 1989, 1993, and 1997. So, we realized that we could use these more recent surveys to address the claims of conservative commentators.

What added  urgency to this project was the introduction of a version of David Horowitz's "Academic Bill of Rights" in the Ohio State Legislature in early 2005. When we looked at the preliminary results of the Carnegie data that supported our suspicions that faculty were not overwhelmingly liberal, we knew we had to get these results out, not just to get a publication, but to inform public- and hopefully legislative- opinion on this issue. We published the  preliminary results in an op-ed piece in the Dayton Daily News ("College Incorporated," 2/14/05) and made them available through the Ohio Faculty Council (an organization of Faculty Senate representatives from all Ohio public universities) and selected legislators. We would like to think that we had some small effect on the outcome, since the legislation was withdrawn in favor of an agreement between the legislature and state universities to "monitor" the situation through existing university policies. Although this allowed Horowitz to claim "victory," it did not impose direct state oversight, nor force changes to existing university policies.         


FE:  What were the basic findings of your research?


JZ and RF: We have several key findings:

(1) although liberal faculty outnumber conservatives (2.3 to 2.6 to 1 in the most recent data), between 1989 and 1997, there was increased movement to the center among faculty;

(2) there are considerable differences in the relative liberalism of faculty across disciplines and institutional types, with conservatives being the plurality in some fields (e.g., business, vocational fields) and in two-year colleges;

(3) younger cohorts of faculty tend to be more centrist and conservative than older cohorts, while women tend to be more liberal than men, trends that could have countervailing impacts over time; and

(4) there are significant differences in educational values between liberal and conservative faculty, with conservatives being more interested in preparing students for careers and in shaping their values and less interested in teaching creative thinking or an appreciation of literature and the arts, and less supportive of tenure and the free exchange of ideas in the classroom.

For the rest of the interview, go to Free Exchange on Campus.

Originally posted to Free Exchange on Campus on Tue Sep 19, 2006 at 01:57 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  the big lie (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Buffy Orpington

    as usual...

    the big outcry, a few years ago, about liberal profs was from a study of liberal arts profs. duh. and i bet most business school profs are repugs. it was, like the liberal media myth, just another way for the msm to play the public for fools. thanks for this systematic debunking!

    Nature is not only more complex than we think. It is more complex than we can think. -Frank Egler

    by Laurence Lewis on Tue Sep 19, 2006 at 01:45:48 PM PDT

    •  When we have affirmative action in corporations (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Turkana

      and have more liberals as CEO's, then I will be willing to listen to the low lifes calling for more conservatives teaching at universities.

      There is no need to empower in any way the idea that affirmative action for Cons in education is at all needed.

      There is one place that needs more Cons: prisons. When they do the time to suit their crimes, that will be the right place for their hard labors, at prisoner's pay.

  •  This is pretty good news right here: (0+ / 0-)

    ...liberal faculty outnumber conservatives (2.3 to 2.6 to 1 in the most recent data),

    If we ever end up with a majority of conservative faculty who have little interest in teaching critical thinking skills (maybe because they lack those skills themselves?), this country will really be in trouble.

    I personally think that the college-level course in critical thinking should be taught in high school and required of seniors for graduation. Critical thinking skills are essential for understanding the progressive point of view.

    Terrorists are plotting against us in London. What are we doing in Iraq??

    by jzilliac on Tue Sep 19, 2006 at 01:54:22 PM PDT

    •  More importantly, (0+ / 0-)

      critical thinking skills are essential to understanding reality.

      •  Privatization of public schools, and the (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Distaste for Dissent

        control and destruction of our college system, and the devaluation of professional careers through outsourcing, downsizing, and various other methods (such as the ruination of the pharmacist profession) by corporate powers, is all part of the Neocon/Rethug mindset.

        Our college system is one thing that our country still has that is generally excellent. Skyrocketing tuition and the stagnation of college loans (which have hardly increased in decades) is threatening access and delivery of services. Many of our colleges are now run poorly administratively because of funding squeezes.

        This garbage diversion of political tyranny by Horowitz and his Neocon masters has no more value than a frat boy's vomit on Friday night.

  •  Well (0+ / 0-)

    Where I went to college there was plenty of conservative thought represented.

    http://www.keen.com/jiacinto For DC related travel advice, please visit that link.

    by jiacinto on Tue Sep 19, 2006 at 02:10:12 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site