Inspired by the discussion in
this diary where it was pointed out by someone that technically, since the boys he was messaging were pubescent, Foley is not a pedophile.
The person went on to suggest that we shouldn't call him one since he isn't one. You know though, I think he's wrong. I think we should make sure to call him a pedophile at all times, especially if we can get them to defend him by pointing out he technically isn't one.
Picture Hannity making a big defense of Foley explaining how he isn't a technical pedophile. Not only will that make Hannity look like a huge idiot, it won't go over well with most people and, more importantly, it will keep this discussion alive.
Either it will make them agree with us that he is, indeed, a pedophile or it will make them actually try to defend the guy by saying that he wasn't a 'true' pedophile. Either way, it's good for us.
As I said in the other thread, we need to stop taking the high road. I am sick and tired of candidates who are not slinging mud because they feel it is beneath them. It's not beneath any Republicans and you know that if Foley was a Democrat, they would all call him a pedophile and not care that it wasn't true.
So make sure you call him a pedophile even though he isn't technically a pedophile. It can only work in our favor. Sure, it isn't technically true, but considering THEY are willing to just out-and-out LIE, I don't see anything wrong with it.