Skip to main content

Deep and cleansing breath...

WE WON!

It is not a final victory, but it is a very satisfying accomplishment.

I am very happy.

Of the Abramoff 65, 18 have been defeated, 5 are in still too close call and the rest are on notice for 2008 and beyond.

This is great! And the exit polls tell us that "corruption" was a factor in the GOP's defeat. And so do GOP shrills like Rich Lowry:

The "culture of corruption" was real. [snip]

Voters took a good whiff of the odor emanating from Washington and some of their Republican representatives, and recoiled.

The stink is still there. Some of the worst Republican scoundrels were re-elected--some by tight margins and others by 15 points or more.

It is VERY important that we keep the pressure up. We can not let the notion of Republican corruption become a mid-term election fad.

Abramoff related indictments are coming. And then there is the fall-out from the Foley Scandal, the Cunningham scandal and the many others waiting in the wings.

Join me on the jump to review our victories and what's next...

I've posted about Abramoff since I joined the DKos community back in March 2004. I have been researching the GOP/Abramoff scandal since 1999. For a long time now I have been working to get these corrupt Republicans the credit they deserve.

Last Tuesday's election was a milestone. Revulsion at the Republican Culture of Corruption was second only to the war in Iraq in motivating voters to fire the Republican Congress and send a message to George W. Bush.

I like to think that my Diaries and work with campaigns and reporters might have had a hand in bringing the corruption issue to the surface.

We did a great job this year and I want to THANK everybody who ran and those who worked so hard on these campaigns.

We had some victories and quite a few losses. Like many others I adopted a few races and their loss hit me pretty hard. I have a hard time accepting that both John Doolittle and Dennis Hastert are still in Congress. My only consolation is that they will not serve out their terms. The reality of their corruption will force resignations and special elections. They will not be alone.

Of the seats we lost, some were close and some were not. In any case these losses are important steps on the road to long-range victory. These campaigns have proven the importance of showing up to do battle. And all of the corrupt Republicans who made the Abramoff 65 are on notice.

We have two years to highlight and expand on their corruption.

I know is that Jack Abramoff will lead many more Republicans to defeat. I would not be surprised to have more than 65 Republicans with an Abramoff problem in 2008.

And that doesn't even count special elections (like the one after Doolittle is indicted).

Many Republican Presidential candidates will have ties to Abramoff (Gingrich and McCain easily come to mind) and then there is the GOP infrastructure, the Reeds, Roves, Armeys and Norquists of the world. We need to loudly proclaim their deep, deep connections to Abramoff and Republican corruption.

But first a review of how the Abramoff 65 made out on Tuesday. They divide into three groups:

Five Too Close to Call
They are still counting votes in these races. Some will break our way. Some will not. Any Republican who survives is a major target for 2008. Some (Barbara Cubin comes to mind) will be beset by their scandal connections over the next two years. Here are the toss-ups:
CT-02: Joe Courtney (D) [50%] is 166 votes ahead of Rob Simmons (R) [50%]
GA-12: John Barrow (D) [50.31%] is 889 votes ahead of Max Burns (R) [49.69%]
NC-08: Larry Kissell (D) [50%] is 449 votes behind Robin Hayes (R) [50%]
NM-01: Patricia Madrid (D) [50%] is 1487 votes behind Heather Wilson (R) [50%]
WY-AL: Gary Trauner (D) [48%] is 970 vote behind Barbara Cubin (R) [48%]

18 Democratic Victories
There is a lot to be happy about in these victories. Hayworth, Pombo, Burns, Taylor and Sweeney easily come to mind. And who isn't smiling about Santorum, Allen and Talent. The Culture of Corruption play a big role in electing these Democrats. Congratulations to everybody who worked so hard to elect the folks. Thank you and cheers for these wins:

AZ-05: Harry Mitchell (D) [50%] defeats the corrupt JD Hayworth (R) [46%]
CA-11: Jerry McNerney (D) [53%] defeats the corrupt Richard Pombo (R) [47%]
IA-Gov: Chet Culver (D) [54%] defeats the corrupt Jim Nussle (R) [45%]
IN-02: Joe Donnelly (D) [54%] defeats the corrupt Chris Chocola (R) [46%]
KY-03: John Yarmuth (D) [51%] defeats the corrupt Anne Northup (R) [48%]
MD-Gov: Martin O'Malley (D) [53%] defeats the corrupt Bobby Ehrlich (R) [46%]
MN-01: Tim Walz (D) [53%] defeats the corrupt Gilbert Gutknecht (R) [47%]
MO-SEN: Claire McCaskill (D) [50%] defeats the corrupt Jim Talent (R) [47%]
MT-SEN:     Jon Tester (D) [49%] defeats the corrupt Conrad Burns (R) [48%]
NC-11: Heath Shuler (D) [54%] defeats the corrupt Charles Taylor (R) [46%]
NY-20: Kirsten Gillibrand (D) [53%] defeats the corrupt John Sweeney (R) [47%]
OH-18: Zack Space (D) [62%] defeats the corrupt Ney/Padgett (R) [38%]
OK-Gov: Brad Henry (D) 67%] defeats the corrupt Ernest Istook (R) 33%]
PA-10: Chris Carney (D) [53%] defeats the corrupt Don Sherwood (R) [47%]
PA-SEN: Bob Casey (D) [59%] defeats the corrupt Rick Santorum (R) [41%]
TX-22: Nick Lampson (D) [52%] defeats the corrupt DeLay/Sekula-Gibbs (R) [42%]
VA-SEN: Jim Webb (D) [50%] defeats the corrupt George Allen (R) [49%]
WI-Gov: Jim Doyle (D) [53%] defeats the corrupt Mark Green (R) [45%]

42 Republican Targets for 2008 and beyond
It looks like two thirds of the Abramoff 65 will be re-elected. There was some heartbreak in these races, like Doolittle narrowly defeating Charlie Brown. And some of the worst supporters of Abramoff's efforts to protect a system of sweatshops, human trafficking, force prostitution and forced abortion on the Commonwealth of North Mariana Islands (CNMI) won by wide margins.

To those who ran against these corrupt scoundrels: Thank you. And a big tip of my hat to all of you who fought to elect Democrats in your Republican represented districts. You have my thanks and I hope we can provide more resources and support in the coming years.

Democrats can win these seats. NOW is the time to start working to reverse these defeats:

AK-AL: Diane Benson (D) [40%] was defeated by the corrupt Don Young (R) [57%]
AL-Gov: Lucy Baxley (D) [42%] was defeated by the corrupt Bob Riley (R) [58%]
CA-04: Charlie Brown (D) [46%] was defeated by the corrupt John Doolittle (R) [49%]
CA-19: TJ Cox (D) [40%] was defeated by the corrupt George Radanovich (R) [60%]
CA-41: Louie Contreras (D) [33%] was defeated by the corrupt Jerry Lewis (R) [67%]
CA-44: Louis Vandenberg (D) [38%] was defeated by the corrupt Ken Calvert (R) [59%]
CA-46: Jim Brandt: (D) 37%] was defeated by the corrupt Dana Rohrbacher: (R) 59%]
CA-50: Francine Busby (D) [43%] was defeated by the corrupt Brian Bilbray: (R) 53%]
CA-52: John Rinaldi (D) [32%] was defeated by the corrupt Duncan Hunter (R) [65%]
CO-04: Angie Paccione (D) [43%] was defeated by the corrupt Marilyn Musgrave (R) [46%]
CO-06: Bill Winter (D) [40%] was defeated by the corrupt Tom Tancredo (R) [59%]
FL-24: Chet Culver (D) [42%] was defeated by the corrupt Tom Feeney (R) [58%]
GA-01: Jim Nelson (D) [32%] was defeated by the corrupt Jack Kingston (R) [68%]
GA-06: Steve Stinton (D) [28%] was defeated by the corrupt Tom Price (R) [72%]
IL-06: Tammy Duckworth (D) [49%] was defeated by the corrupt Peter Roskam (R) [51%]
IL-14: John Laesch (D) [40%] was defeated by the corrupt Denny Hastert (R) [60%]
IN-05: Katherine Carr (D) [32%] was defeated by the corrupt Dan Burton (R) [65%]
MI-08: Jim Marcinkowski (D) [43%] was defeated by the corrupt Mike Rogers (R) [55%]
MI-09: Nancy Skinner (D) [46%] was defeated by the corrupt Joe Knoellenberg (R) [52%]
MO-06: Sara Shettles (D) [36%] was defeated by the corrupt Sam Graves (R) [61%]
MO-07: Jack Truman (D) [30%] was defeated by the corrupt Roy Blunt (R) [67%]
MS-03: No Democratic Opponent ensured the re-election of the corrupt Chip Pickering (R) [78%]
MT-AL: Monica Lindeen (D) [39%] was defeated by the corrupt Dennis Rehberg (R) [59%]
NJ-03: Rich Sexton (D) [41%] was defeated by the corrupt Jim Saxton (R) [58%]
NJ-07: Linda Stender (D) [48%] was defeated by the corrupt Mike Ferguson (R) [49%]
NJ-11: Tom Wyka (D) [37%] was defeated by the corrupt Rodney Frelinghuysen (R) [63%]
NV-03: Tessa Hafen (D) [47%] was defeated by the corrupt Jon Porter (R) [48%]
NV-SEN: Jack Carter (D) [41%] was defeated by the corrupt John Ensign (R) [55%]
OH-14: Lewis Katz (D) [39%] was defeated by the corrupt Steven LaTourette (R) [58%]
PA-03: Steve Porter (D) [42%] was defeated by the corrupt Philip English (R) [54%]
PA-06: Lois Murphy (D) [49%] was defeated by the corrupt Jim Gerlach (R) [51%]
SC-03: Lee Ballenger (D) [37%] was defeated by the corrupt J. Gresham Barrett (R) [67%]
TN-02: John Greene (D) [22%] was defeated by the corrupt John 'Jimmy' Duncan (R) [78%]
TX-04: Glenn Melancon (D) [33%] was defeated by the corrupt Ralph Hall (R) [65%]
TX-12: John Morris (D) [31%] was defeated by the corrupt Kay Granger (R) [67%]
TX-32: Will Pryor (D) [41%] was defeated by the corrupt Pete Sessions (R) [57%]
UT-03: Christian Burridge (D) [32%] was defeated by the corrupt Chris Cannon (R) [58%]
VA-05: Al Weed (D) [40%] was defeated by the corrupt Virgil Goode (R) [59%]
VA-07: Jim Nachman (D) [34%] was defeated by the corrupt Eric Cantor (R) [64%]
VA-11: Andrew Hurst (D) [44%] was defeated by the corrupt Tom Davis (R) [55%]
WA-05: Peter Goldmark (D) [45%] was defeated by the corrupt Cathy McMorris (R) [55%]
WV-02: Mike Callaghan (D) [43%] was defeated by the corrupt Shelly Capito (R) [57%]

These are a lot of races to loose, but still the results fill me with some hope for 2008. Many of these Republicans had their closest race ever. Many of these "safe" GOP seats were below 60%. Here is where the 50 State strategy combined with a focus on Republican corruption can have an impact on 2008. More money and attention to these seats will force the GOP to compete in more places. Recruiting strong Democratic challengers will also be important. All of these Republicans should face serious well-funded opposition from now on. If we keep the pressure on, some of these folks will retire, some will be defeated and some will be indicted.

We need to start working now to ensure their defeat. It is time to plot our take-over of the 111th Congress.

With more support, we will win some of these races come 2008. If we are to win, we must share the knowledge gained in this cycle.

Many of us got involved in the 2006 election late in the game. Many campaigns faced long odds with little support from the DNC and other National organizations. All of us learned valuable things.

It is time to harness that energy and learning.

I propose that we start a "Project 111" to organize, train and fund candidates for victory in 2008 and membership in the 111th Congress.

We have a tremendous base of knowledge and experience. It is important to harness, honor and use that base of power for future victories.

Some candidates will run again. Some will not, but all campaigns and their supporters have insights into what kind of resources, training and funding will be needed to win in 2008.

Research is key to keeping the "Republican Culture of Corruption" narrative alive over the next two years. The Abramoff story is not going away. We need to be prepared to use this and other scandals as we work to govern in the 110th Congress and prepare to win more seats in 2008.

Perhaps this could be a topic for the Yearly Kos.

Still all in all, last Tuesday was a very good day. Many Republican ideas have never faced oversight of a serious testing in the marketplace of ideas. This accountability moment is long overdue.

My thanks to one and all for all the hard work that led to this new day in America.

CHEERS!

Originally posted to dengre on Sun Nov 12, 2006 at 06:37 PM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (29+ / 0-)

    I just want to say a big thank you to the many Daily Kos researchers and supporters who have helped me with my Abramoff research.

    This victory is like our Party, it is made up of many people pulling together for the common good.

    Thanks.

  •  Jack's Back! (9+ / 0-)

    Singing in the FBI naughty chair.

    Democrats: Putting Intelligence Back Into National Security

    by Robert Davies on Sun Nov 12, 2006 at 06:43:30 PM PST

  •  You are an amazing single person (14+ / 0-)

    opposition research shop! It's wonderful news that you are already on top of the Abramoff thuggery for '08 but I'm still hoping that the DNC will swipe your considerable talents out from under our noses. Thanks for all your terrific work. Pombo was on the top of my hit list for the House and there is no doubt in my mind that you and Land of Enchantment were instrumental in NcNerny's victory.

  •  Corruption may revolve around Murtha or Hoyer (3+ / 0-)

    in '08. Hoyer is a friend of K-Street and AIPAC, while Murtha was named on CREW's list. That means Murtha was listed with these people:

    • Sen. Conrad Burns (R-MT)
    • Sen. Bill Frist (R-TN)
    • Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA)
    • Rep. Roy Blunt (R-MO)
    • Rep. Ken Calvert (R-CA)
    • Rep. John Doolittle (R-CA)
    • Rep. Tom Feeney (R-FL)
    • Rep. Katherine Harris (R-FL)
    • Rep. William Jefferson (D-LA)
    • Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-CA)
    • Rep. Gary Miller (R-CA)
    • Rep. Alan Mollohan (D-WV)
    • Rep. Marilyn Musgrave (R-CO)
    • Rep. Richard Pombo (R-CA)
    • Rep. Rick Renzi (R-AZ)
    • Rep. Pete Sessions (R-TX)
    • Rep. John Sweeney (R-NY)
    • Rep. Charles Taylor (R-NC)
    • Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA)
    • Rep. Curt Weldon (R-PA)
    • Rep. Chris Cannon (R-UT)
    • Rep. Dennis Hastert (R-IL)
    • Rep. J.D. Hayworth (R-AZ)
    • Rep. John Murtha (D-PA)
    • Rep. Don Sherwood (R-PA)
    •  Have Murtha or Hoyer... (0+ / 0-)

      accepted money from Jack Abramoff?

      "The more successful people are in society, the more successful society is."

      by Potus2020 on Sun Nov 12, 2006 at 06:58:12 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

    •  That is a non-connection (5+ / 0-)

      And like comparing carrots to rotting meat.

      Even if the worse allegation about Murtha are true, it has NOTHING to do with Abramoff and it is small compared to the Republican Culture of Corruption.

      I tend to think that the Murtha stuff has been ginned up. The CREW list "needed" some Democrats so the press would cover it as "balanced. Murtha was in the news, so he was a good add.

      The Republicans on the list are part of an interlocking scandal ran by the Leadership of the Party.

      The Democrats on the list may be involved with individual wrong doing or failure to properly report financial transactions.

      These are very different things. They are not the same. They are not equivalent.

      •  You're right, and you're not right (0+ / 0-)

        Sweeping small potatoes under the rug leads to trouble later.  Abramoff may be the biggest, most far-reaching of the scandals.  But it's not the only one.  Of the 4 Republican Congressman who've resigned, only one was for items directly related to Abramoff (Ney).  Though of course Delay was all wrapped up in it, his current legal problems are technically separate from Abramoff.

        Each of them contributed to the public perception that brought this election result.  IMHO, it's not wise to pooh-pooh other scandals.  For example, it would probably be just as well if Jefferson loses his seat next month.  IThe seat will still stay Dem.  People understand the $90k in the freezer thing.  It's easier to get your mind around than the complexity of the Abramoff busienss.  Fair or not, we look the other way at corruption at our peril.

        •  I am only reacting to the (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          vcmvo2

          equating the scandals as having the same weight.

          We have had and we will have Democrats involved in scandal. We need to remove them when the evidence moves beyond flimsy and into hard and irrefutable.

          We are not there with the stories about Murtha.

          We are there with Jefferson.

          And Jefferson's crimes are his. They were not organized by the Democratic Leadership to fund one-party rule in our Nation.

          That is the big difference between Republican and Democratic scandals: individual misdeeds versus organized and systematic corruption.

          I hope Jefferson is defeated in the run-off. And I hope that the 110th Congress sets a very high bar for ethical conduct.

          I would love to see them outlaw Leadership PACs, but I do not expect it.

    •   Pretty good chance... (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      peraspera, OrangeClouds115

      ...that Jefferson's going to be replaced by State Sen. Karen Carter (D) in a December 9 runoff for LA-02.  Probably just as well.  

      If we don't tolerate corruption in Repubs, we better not sweep it under the rug amongst Dems, or our team will lose power fast due to hypocrisy.  If we look the other way, it only encourages bigger problems later.

      Bad idea.

    •  oh boy (0+ / 0-)

      we've gotta keep our own people in check. BTW, where's William Jefferson these days? He wasn't re-elected, was he?

      Recipe For America - A people-powered movement to take back our food system

      by OrangeClouds115 on Sun Nov 12, 2006 at 07:20:06 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  I agree. (4+ / 0-)

    I think the most important thing we can do as a party for the next 2 years is expose this Republican corruption until Conservative Republican is a nastier thing to call people than Liberal Democrat.

    Proud Big L Liberal Democrat myself.

  •  Why wait till 08 (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    peraspera, Land of Enchantment

    If there was illegal activity... then it should not wait. Especially in the chance that any of the crooked Republican Senators can be replaced by a Dem...keep after them until they admit to the crime... then ask them to go.Lieberman would be a non-issue if we get one more seat... and with legitimate crimes... they should not keep their seat.

    Let the voters get those that remain in 08... but some of these guys really need to go sooner than that.

    Fear grows in darkness; if you think there's a bogeyman around, turn on the light. -Dorothy Thompson -6.88,-6.92

    by jigsaw68 on Sun Nov 12, 2006 at 07:06:09 PM PST

  •  great diary, thanks (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    peraspera

    I've been hearing from others how good your diaries are but this is the first one I've read (I don't get to read much due to migraine troubles). Keep up the great work. It was exciting to see people like Pombo ousted but disheartening to watch scum like Doolittle re-elected.

    Recipe For America - A people-powered movement to take back our food system

    by OrangeClouds115 on Sun Nov 12, 2006 at 07:19:07 PM PST

    •  Take comfort. (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      peraspera, OrangeClouds115, vcmvo2

      Quite likely Doolittle's days are numbered.

      Interestingly, the Pombo post mortem news coverage had several former supporters put off by his family getting paid so much of the campaign contribution money ($350k over the last 3 cycles).  Let's hope the voters in CA-04 were similarly put off by Mrs. Doolittle's windfalls.  Unfortunately, it wasn't enough to tip the balance.  But Doolittle didn't even get 50% of the vote, so he'll likely never be invulnerable like before.  It is a disappointment that the voters still returned him to his seat, even with all the multivarious scandal associated with him.

      •  Doolittle may also face the Ethics Committee (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Land of Enchantment

        I wonder which one will deal with his issues first - Ethics Committee or the Dept. of Justice?
        Doolittle's post election interviews are more somber, less bravado.
        It was a close election and Doolittle has not ever had anyone get this close to beating him. Doolittle is used to getting over 60% of the vote. Change is in the air.

  •  There could be several special (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    peraspera

    elections due to Abramoff and other coruption issues.  Reportedly, Renzi, Doolittle, and Burns (defeated) are ready to be indicted, but the "Justice" Dept. held them until after the election.  And there may be many more.

  •  Capitol corruption requires more than surgery (0+ / 0-)

    Throwing the bums out of office was only one step in returning health to the Nation’s Capitol.  

    The cancer of corruption is systemic rather than isolated.  It is not cured simply by surgically removing the tumors. Comprehensive integrative therapies and ongoing treatments are required to ensure systemic change, full remission.

    Surely those who betrayed the public trust (Abramoff 65) by courting Abramoff, most certainly did a similar dance of exploitation with other suitors who for now go virtually undetected taking shelter (hiding) in the shadows cast by Abramoff.

    In this case, "we must not be detered."  The appropriate policy here is "stay the course."

    Those who resigned this year or were swept out of office on Election Day must continue to be the target of investigation and examination so that we can understand the full extent of the current situation, expose their public and private sector co-conspirators, undertake appropriate complimentary follow up therapies and actions and increase any real odds of full recovery and change.  

    Jack Abramoff might be the most infamous co-conspirator right now; but doubtful he is the most notorious.

    "Pulling out now would represent 'failure' rather than 'victory' over the terrorists" responsible for corruption in our Nation's Capitol.

  •  Project 111 (0+ / 0-)

    I'll help contribute to Project 111!

    Thanks again for connecting the dots and more...

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site