Skip to main content

Cross-posted from The Tortellini:

If you listen to tort reform debates long enough, you'll hear a common refrain about the tort system's "unpredictability" and "irrational jurors" who can't be trusted to put a dollar figure on corporate or medical wrongdoing. Sober legal minds like the University of Chicago's Cass Sunstein and patrician Common Good founder Philip Howard argue that decisions about the size of punitive or noneconomic damages ought to be made by experts, not average Americans on juries, maybe even using some sort of fixed schedule, to bring more order and predictability to the system.

This all sounds so reasonable and rational, until you read stories like those published in the Charleston Gazette last month about coal mine safety.

Veteran coal industry reporter Ken Ward Jr. is, like me, the recipient of an Alicia Patterson fellowship, and I heard him speak about his 6-month investigation  into mine safety Monday at the foundation's annual luncheon in D.C.

After sharing the gruesome details of the deaths of hundreds of coal miners in his state, Ken dropped this staggering statistic: Over the past few years, the experts in the Mine Safety and Health Administration, in their rational and predictable way, fined coal companies a whopping $250 for every miner they killed by ignoring safety regulations already on the books.

Given the scandalously low number, a shocked member of the Patterson audience wanted to know if the miners' families had sued over these preventable accidents. Ken wisely noted (with a generous plug for my book!) that in West Virginia, the workers comp system makes wrongful death lawsuits extremely difficult to win and that the coal companies basically get away with murder. But hey, the system is rational and predictable! God forbid an overly emotional jury should get a shot at say, the Sago mine operators. They might think that those 12 miners' lives were worth a little more than a high three figures.

Originally posted to smencimer on Wed Dec 06, 2006 at 12:39 PM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Hey, set aside those sentimental arguments: (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    bustacap, happy camper

    We still need juries because the CONSTITUTION DEMANDS IT.

    Seventh Amendment: right to a jury trial in civil matters is preserved.

    What does that mean?  It means that if you had a right to a jury trial in 1781 (when the United States came into existence), nobody can take away that right to a jury trial.  Juries are such an indispensable part of the federal system that they trump concerns about forum shopping and inequitable administration of the law.  

    Compromise on Personnel - Never on Principle. Street Prophets - "Ani Adonai Eloheichem" He says.

    by mkrell on Wed Dec 06, 2006 at 01:01:29 PM PST

    •  Sigh (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      bustacap, mkrell

      I just finished my civil procedure final, my first ever law school final.

      And now I can't escape it.

      But you're right on (though you knew that).

      Oh and unrealtedly, Cass Sunstein's a hack.

      "No government has the right to tell its citizens whom to love. The only queer people are those who don't love anybody." - Rita Mae Brown (-5.38, -6.77)

      by AUBoy2007 on Wed Dec 06, 2006 at 01:16:48 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site