They ran a short bit on Countdown last night about a retired FBI officer that uncovered a domestic group aiding Al Qaeda, and was told not to investigate it by the FBI. The article this was based on: (
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/02/politics/02whistleblower.html)
What's going on here?
In the wake of the William Krar incident in Texas
(
http://www.dailystar.com/dailystar/relatedarticles/27119.php), it seems like Ashcroft is asleep at the wheel. This Krar guy had a cyanide bomb big enough to kill everyone in a 30,000 sq ft. room. That seems to me to fit the description of a WMD.
Then there's the matter of the terror alert for the DNC. Why did the FBI trot out the threat of attack by Anarchists on CNN, when the Boston police believed the threat came from white supremacists? (http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/Investigation/convention_Security_040723.html)
We've got this terror threat out, that's supposed to be coming from Al Qaeda. But, what's going to happen if some nut like Krar uses a cyanide bomb or other WMD? What do you bet that it's going to be exactly like Oklahoma City, where they blamed arab terrorists when in fact it was McVeigh and right wing nuts?