Skip to main content

Like that gunboat in Heart of Darkness, just firing away at random, deserted jungle, the AC-130 we used in Somalia is excellent at making big booms, and leaving large smoking holes. This is thought to have a salutary effect on upstart brown peoples.

There's a discussion over at Yglesias' site (see link below) about whether the AC-130 was the right weapon for the bombing of that suspected/supposed al Qaeda operative in Somalia the other day.  But I think that it really is pointless to discuss the finer points of this system's technical strengths and weaknesses for the task at hand, as if there actually were a task at hand beyond making a demonstration of our ability to leave large smoking holes wherever we want. The notion that we have any idea of whatever structure something called "al Qaeda" may have, sufficient to be able to ID who's in charge of what, is laughable. The idea that some notional "our man in Modagishu", ever alert for these key al Qaeda operatives that our expertise has identified, and probably circulates packs of playing cards with their pictures, spotted our intended target and dogged his footsteps to the Kenyan border to call in this airstrike, is ludicrous. I doubt that even the con men in charge of the whole operation believe that they have any idea who or what may have been at ground zero of those smoking holes. The only thing one can be confident of from this report, is that there would be no report were there not a need for some positive news of progress in the GWOT on the eve of Our Leader's inspiring speech outlining the Glorious Way Forward. Onward, to ever more and larger smoking holes, in ever more countries! The brown people will get the message sooner or later.

There is a reason that such operations are covert. They never accomplish anything, except in the song and story of politically useful legend. I don't mean that they create blowback, and are in the long run ineffective, or even counterproductive, because of unintended downstream consequences. That may be true as well. I mean that they are, in real time, essentially fictional. The people who get blown up are all too real, but these people exist to us solely as props in a bad novel generated by an understanding of the world usually totally off-base, and incredibly superficial even where it is not completely misplaced. I have been a keen observer of the US political scene my entire adult life, and I wouldn't have any idea who in the Republican political machine to send the AC-130s after, or any confidence that knocking off any or all of them would improve the world, despite an utter confidence that they have fucked up the world mightily. When thinking about our own society, we're aware enough of the complexity that we recognize that thinking at that superficial level, that our problems all stem from "bad guys" whose blowing away in smoking holes would solve all those problems, however momentarily satisfying it might be, simply doesn't reality-test, quite aside from the "Thou shalt not kill" ethical considerations. I am confident that these black ops idiots and their political masters do not somehow possess a deeper understanding of the politics of the Muslim world than I do of the US scene, not only from the general principle that they cannot be as immersed in its politics as much as I have been in ours, but from the very fact that they think it even possibly a good idea to send in AC-130s to solve a political problem, even if we did have any idea that the person we thought was actually on the receiving end. Even if we did have the intended man, we certainly had no idea who or what he really might have been.

The blind can only lead the blind, which is why they want us to stay blindfolded. We won't be led by sighted persons until we take our blindfolds off and end the security state's regime of secrecy.

AC-130 article

Originally posted to gtomkins on Tue Jan 09, 2007 at 08:47 PM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Somilia (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Stripe, epppie

    This breaks my heart.  

    I do not know what weapons World War III will be fought with. World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones. -- Albert Einstein

    by elveta on Tue Jan 09, 2007 at 08:53:12 PM PST

  •  Bravo! (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    epppie

    You've perfectly articulated my own reservations about another US 'surgical strike'. Colin Powell went up before the UN with an entire dossier of 'state of the art' US 'intelligence'. Hans Blix spent months chasing around Iraq in searches prompted by 'reliable intelligence' that turned out to be completely bogus. Why in the world should we just accept at face value 1.what this administration alleges about the whereabouts of Al Qaeda operatives, and 2. their ability to successfully target any such targets without enormous collateral damage ?  

  •  thousand of rounds per second (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Stripe, epppie

    just what you need for pinpoint targeting of particular individuals.

    Oh that we had the gift to see ourselves as others see us. Robbie Burns

    by ohcanada on Tue Jan 09, 2007 at 08:59:40 PM PST

  •  There's an excellent SOMALIA diary (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ohcanada, epppie

    that just turned up on the Diary Rescue tonite. Worthy of a REC - in my humble opinion.

    http://www.dailykos.com/...

  •  It's at least as easy for me to believe (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ohcanada

    that they were shooting at nothing, or nothing signifigant to any war on terror, than that they were shooting at something that was important to the war on terror.

    And I don't mean that as a criticism of the soldiers.  I mean it as a criticism of the people directing policy.

    http://www.progressivehistorians.com/frontPage.do

    by epppie on Tue Jan 09, 2007 at 09:15:05 PM PST

    •  There are jobs for which we shouldn't have tools (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      ohcanada, epppie

      I don't criticize the soldiers either.  I was one for twenty years.  But I was part of a tool, the Medical Corps, that did a job we actually needed to have done.  We simply don't need to have done this job our black ops hit men do of blowing away folks outside of clearly defined and publicly declared wars.  I don't criticize them, I just want to see most of the Intel and Spec Ops community out of a job that doesn't need doing, and causes pointless harm in the doing.

      The way up and the way down are one and the same.

      by gtomkins on Tue Jan 09, 2007 at 09:33:10 PM PST

      [ Parent ]

  •  "surgical," when used by non-medical (0+ / 0-)

    personnel is always bull-shit.  It ALWAYS means taking a meat cleaver to the situation - and showing everyone just how big your balls are.  

    Thanks for articulating this.  Nice diary.  

  •  maybe I am just paranoid or cynical, but... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Simplify

    this smells so much like wag the dog....

    I think it was just atmospherics for the speech tonight.  

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site