Skip to main content

Democracy begins and ends with self determination, therefore "allowing" each precinct, township, and province to chart their own future is paramount in producing a democratic government. The American effort to force a top-down system of government on the Iraqi people is undemocratic and destined to failure.

The real test of democracy is can it provide every person and group their rights and self determination. From the beginning a unified Iraq was a foolish and unrealistic view that could be seen only from a colonialist perspective, and to try to foist democracy at the point of a corrupt gun was even more foolish.
But even now, we could "allow" each of the Iraqi regions their own government and then step out of the way. Giving each Iraqi self determination will allow them to pave their own way, face their own demons, live within the international community, and develop their own democracy-which is truly the definition of democracy.
Offending the neighbors should not be a real issue, those who have held the Kurds under subjugation and from self determination have no moral standing in holding back their independence, and independent shiite and sunni Iraqi states would have to live within internationally acceptable conduct and limits or face condemnation and sanctions.
In any case, Iraq is what it is, and each people should be able to have their own homeland and their own government. The partitioning of Iraq will happen, what we can do is get on the side of reality and help reduce the pain and bloodshed during the separation.

Originally posted to altruist51 on Sat Jan 20, 2007 at 06:22 AM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  no? (0+ / 0-)

    a point from the NYT article this morning

    The draft comes down firmly on the side of central oversight, a decision that advocates for Iraq’s unity are likely to trumpet as a triumph.

  •  Oh dear (0+ / 0-)

    This isn't a diary.  From the FAQ:

    1.  Diaries should be substantive. A good guideline is that if you don't have at least three solid paragraphs to write about your subject, you should probably post a comment in an open thread, or in a recent diary or front-page post that covers a topic relevant to what you wish to write about.

    Please flesh it out a bit or delete it.  Thanks.

    'Every day I delete somebody from my mobile phone because they've been killed.' - unnamed Iraqi refugee

    by TruthOfAngels on Sat Jan 20, 2007 at 06:39:08 AM PST

  •  Flesh this out a bit (0+ / 0-)

    This diary has potential, but right now it takes up as much space as one of those "Did You Know?" columns you find in textbooks.

    Expand on this or delete.

    We will appoint as...officials, only men that know the law of the realm and are minded to keep it well. -- Magna Carta, #46 (-6.25, -7.18)

    by DH from MD on Sat Jan 20, 2007 at 06:44:05 AM PST

  •  that is what (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    borkitekt

    Ayatollah Sistani said from the beginning . . . "local" elections first (and immediately), followed by a "bottom up" national unity government.

    But that would have produced an Iraqi government, not an American puppet, so the idea was rejected out of hand.

    It is not now, and never was, about "bringing democracy to Iraq".

  •  Iraq is not Yugoslavia (0+ / 0-)

    they went throughsomething called the Iran-Iraq war. There was in recent memory an institution called the Iraqi army that , while it may have been imbalanced in ethnic makeup (which incidentally doesn't seem to have diminished the US military's effectiveness) was thought to be at one time one of the most formidable organizations in the ME. There are still millions of committed, passionate nationalists from all confessional groups in Iraq. The centrifigal forces hurling Iraq apart today stem from their being invaded and occupied by a foreign power of dubious legal and moral standing. Once we start to withdraw (and we will) I suspect (of course I don't know) that the next generation of Iraqi leaders will have a lot more in common with Tito than Milosevic. They have institutional memory, language and ethnic similarity, and incentive to resist partition.  

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site