Skip to main content

Cross posted at

General Peter Pace, the top US military officer, recently said, "I believe that homosexual acts between individuals are immoral and that we should not condone immoral acts.... I do not believe that the armed forces of the United States are well served by a saying through our policies that it's OK to be immoral in any way."

Human judgements of morality have led to many poor decisions throughout history.  Burning women at the stake was the "moral" thing to do.  Invading and attacking foreign lands is often justified as the "moral" thing to do no matter who is doing the attacking.  Keeping slaves was often considered the "moral" thing to do.  I'm sure the Nazis thought they were upholding their "morality" as they slaughtered millions of Jews.

The question is who defines what "morality" is.  Humans have many ways of determining morality.  It comes from tradition, religion, culture, historical events, etc...  Sometimes morality is determined based on false information or misunderstandings.  Galileo was ruled to be immoral when he argued that the Earth was not the center of the universe.  He was punished for his immorality by the leaders of his time.

In the case of homosexuality, General Pace argues that he knows what is moral and immoral.  He has ruled that homosexuality is an immoral act.

Where does his judgement come from?  He may be making his judgement based on his background or maybe his religion or maybe from his personal experiences.  I have no idea if he thinks his God is supportive of his decision.

I would not claim to speak for God, nor would I claim to know the intentions of God.  I would, however, argue that religious judgements against homosexuality are more human than divine.

Most people consider "God" to be the creator of all living things.  If this is true, we might want to ask ourselves if animals have the ability to be immoral and if God is immoral for creating animals that are homosexual.

Here's a quote from Wikipedia: "Homosexual behavior does occur in the animal kingdom, especially in social species, particularly in marine birds and mammals, monkeys and the great apes. Homosexual behavior has been observed among 1,500 species, and in 500 of those it is well documented." http://en.wikipedia....

I don't think these animals are choosing to be homosexual.  I also don't think these animals are immoral.

There are other ways to argue for and against the "morality" of homosexuality, but I have always considered the example of animal homosexuality as being convincing.  Human judgements of homosexuality being immoral is full of cultural bias, misunderstandings, and the usual lashing out at things that are different from what we are used to.

The lesson in this story is that major decisions are made based on what is considered to be moral.  General Pace is making decisions based on his own view of morality.  In addition to making public judgements about homosexuality, he also is ordering troops to kill people he considers to be evil.  If he is wrong about the morality of homosexuality, should we trust him with deciding who to kill?  Should we agree with him that the best strategy is to put millions of people out of work and then kill them when they fight against the decisions that have led to the disintegration of their country? 

Originally posted to nathan andover on Tue Mar 13, 2007 at 01:21 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site