Skip to main content

Guest poster: Paul Blumenthal of the Sunlight Foundation:

The controversy around the firing of several U.S. attorneys in December has dominated the news coming out of Congress this week and Congresspedia’s staff and citizen editors have been busy tracking developments on our thorough page on the subject. Of central importance to the controversy is the issue of why those eight particular U.S. attorneys were fired.

I’ve been looking into the analyses of the documents released by the Justice Department, and they show that the attorneys were at least partially judged by their willingness to toe-the-line — or, as one internal administration document put it, to be good "Bushies" — and were deemed expendable if they moved too far from administration priorities. In the case of some of the fired attorneys, it appears that the offense committed may have been their investigations into Republican officials, including members of Congress, in the lead-up to the 2006 congressional elections.

Here is a look at four of the attorneys at issue and their respective corruption investigations:

  • Carol Lam, U.S. Attorney for the District of San Diego: In 2005, Lam sent Rep. Duke Cunningham (R-Calif.) to jail for eight years and eight months for multiple felonies including tax evasion and accepting bribes. Cunningham, a leading Republican member of the Appropriations Committee, had been receiving bribes from Mitchell Wade, a defense contractor who was also convicted by Lam, and allegedly from Brent Wilkes, another defense contractor and huge campaign contributor to President Bush’s 2004 reelection committee. Days before she was forced to resign, Lam brought indictments against Wilkes and his friend, the former #3 at the C.I.A., K. Dusty Foggo, on multiple felony counts including conspiracy and wire fraud. Lam’s investigation into Wilkes was leading her to examine his close relationship with other California Republicans including the powerful former Appropriations Chair Jerry Lewis (R-Calif.). Recent revelations also show that a contract given to Wade by the Office of the Vice President may be connected to a yacht purchased by Wade for Cunningham.
  • Paul Charlton, U.S. Attorney for the District of Arizona: In late October 2006, two liberal blogs revealed -- later confirmed by the Associated Press and the Washington Post -- that U.S. Attorney Paul Charlton had opened an investigation into a land deal made by Rep. Rick Renzi (R-Ariz.) and a business partner, James Sandlin. Days after this investigation came to light, the New York Times reported that the Attorney's office had also opened an investigation into whether Renzi introduced legislation that benefited a military contractor who donated heavily to his campaigns and employs his father.
  • Daniel Bogden, U.S. Attorney for the District of Nevada: On February 15, 2007, the Wall Street Journal reported that Daniel Bogden was investigating the newly elected Governor of Nevada, former-Rep. Jim Gibbons (R-Nev.), for allegedly accepting unreported gifts and/or payments from a campaign contributor and earmark recipient, Warren Trepp. The investigation examined the relationship between the former congressman and Trepp between the years 1997-2007. The Journal did not report when the investigation was opened.
  • Bud Cummins, U.S. Attorney for the District of Arkansas: In January 2006, Cummins opened an investigation into "allegations that Missouri Gov. Matt Blunt had rewarded GOP supporters with lucrative contracts to run the state's driver's license offices." Cummins handled the case because the U.S. Attorneys for Missouri recused themselves over conflict of interest concerns. Cummins stated that he was told he would be fired in June as he was wrapping up the case. Cummins eventually brought no indictments against Gov. Blunt, the son of powerful Republican Rep. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.). Cummins has since questioned whether he was fired for opening an investigation into a powerful Republican in a battleground state.

Be sure to check out Congresspedia's members under investigation page for more info on these scandals, as well as our comprehensive page on the U.S. attorney firings controversy.

Originally posted to efullm01 on Wed Mar 21, 2007 at 02:51 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Lam/Yang (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    dunderhead, dotsright

    Wilkes/Foggo..Plea them out

    Follow the money.  

    Those who hear not the music-think the dancers mad

    by Eiron on Wed Mar 21, 2007 at 02:54:10 PM PDT

  •  the big picture vs. public opinion (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    fabooj, dunderhead, myrealname

    it's useful to give a run-down like this, it's an iceberg tip, all the ways from the supreme court picking Bush for us to private companies that owe their contracts to government 'certifying' the votes, that democracy can be undermined. The Republicans are a minority party and they have to gather different groups, like the social conservatives who make minimum wage, or the gays who make a living from the Republican party, but it's not enough to get a president elected, so they have to suppress votes, and they have many ways to do it, now they seem to be using the courts, which have already been packed with nutty people, so if things go to court now, they're hoping the judges will vote with this administration.  This will be a show-down and the we'll get to see how much success they've had. This should be interesting, cause no one's backing down, Bush can't afford to have Rove lie under oath.  They are so grasping at straws now that this is seen as a useful distraction from the war.  I think the dem's will get Rove under oath, they blew their precedents in going after Bill Clinton.  

  •  The longer Bush drags his feet (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    dunderhead, anna shane

    the more time there is to go through the document dump and investigate.  He's digging himself in deeper and deeper.  If Bush/Rove had handled the AG story better, it would have faded away.  Now it's too late.
    (I am not saying they should have handled it differently, only that they could have.)

    Let there be peace on Dailykos, and let it begin with me.

    by myrealname on Wed Mar 21, 2007 at 03:11:57 PM PDT

    •  right (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      dunderhead, myrealname

      now on truthout they have something about the doj manufacturing after the fact defense of what Roberto claimed. The smart guys have left, and the Bush cronies are in it above their heads, and they're sure to make it worse by trying to fix it some more.  Are we having fun yet?  

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site