Skip to main content

by Adam Lambert (clammyc) for ePluribus Media
also available on the ePluribus Media Journal

Hans A. von Spakovsky has been nominated for a full term on the Federal Election Commission (FEC), having already received a recess appointment from President Bush in early 2006, despite his long history of positions and acts which have served to limit the rights of voters, especially minorities.

His "credentials" include efforts in Georgia which curtailed minority voting rights and made it tougher for many likely Democratic voters to be eligible to vote; a stint in the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division; membership in the conservative Federalist Society; and service on the national advisory board of the "Voting Integrity Project" (VIP), whose efforts Jeffrey Toobin in a 2004 The New Yorker suggests served more to keep people from voting than it did to ensure that all votes were counted.

Georgia On My Mind

Von Spakovsky cut his teeth in Georgia during the 1990s, prior to his activity on the national level.  According to the White House announcement of his interim appointment to the FEC in December 2005:

Mr. von Spakovsky currently serves as Counsel to the Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division at the Department of Justice. He previously served the Justice Department as a trial attorney for the Voting Reform Initiative. Prior to that, Mr. von Spakovsky served as a government affairs consultant. Earlier in his career, he was Assistant Vice President, Counsel and Secretary for Confederation Life Insurance Company in Rehabilitation. Mr. von Spakovsky received his bachelor's degree from Massachusetts Institute of Technology and his JD from Vanderbilt University.

Notably, his work experience in Georgia is not included in the White House announcement; however, it is this Georgia experience that demonstrates his role as a tool to implement the administration's unusual policy preferences in the voting rights arena and has raised serious questions as to his qualifications to serve on the FEC, the federal government agency in charge of administering the nation's campaign finance laws, an agency that will be given much greater power if Congressman Rush Holt's (D-NJ) voting reform bill passes. Remarkably, his "assistance" to then-candidate Bush in Florida's 2000 election recount is nowhere to be seen in this White House announcement (or in his bio on the FEC website).

Early Public "Service" in Georgia

As far back as 1997, he was heavily involved in developing and implementing ideas that ultimately served as blueprints for the Florida "felon" voter roll purge, strict voter ID laws in a number of states, the mid-CENSUS redistricting in Texas during 2003 and other acts which ran counter to the idea of "every vote counts".

During 1997, von Spakovsky wrote an article for the Georgia Public Policy Foundation, a conservative research group, which advocated an aggressive purging of the voter rolls. According to Toobin's 2004 article in Tthe New Yorker linked above:

He belonged to the Federalist Society, a prominent organization of conservative lawyers, and had also joined the board of advisers of a lesser-known group called the Voting Integrity Project.

The V.I.P. was founded by Deborah Phillips, a former county official of the Virginia Republican Party, as an organization devoted principally to fighting voting fraud and promoting voter education. In 1997, von Spakovsky wrote an article for the Georgia Public Policy Foundation, a conservative research group, that called for an aggressive campaign to "purge" the election rolls of felons. Within months of that article's publication, the V.I.P. helped put von Spakovsky's idea into action. Phillips met with the company that designed the process for the removal of alleged felons from the voting rolls in Florida, a process that led, notoriously, to the mistaken disenfranchisement of thousands of voters, most of them Democratic, before the 2000 election. (This year, Florida again tried to purge its voting rolls of felons, but the method was found to be so riddled with errors that it had to be abandoned.)

According to Thomas B. Edsall and Dan Eggen September 2005 Washington Post article, the Georgia voter ID law originally envisioned by von Spakovsky was extremely controversial, Justice Department career staff recommended that officials should not be allowed to implement it. And in fact, when von Spakovsky was in the Justice Department, the controversy reached a turning point:

Career Justice Department lawyers involved in a Georgia case said von Spakovsky pushed strongly for approval of a state program requiring voters to have photo identification.  A team of staff lawyers that examined the case recommended 4 to 1 that the Georgia plan should be rejected because it would harm black voters; the recommendation was overruled by von Spakovsky and other senior officials in the Civil Rights Division.

According to Walter C. Jones's 2000 article in the Jackson Florida Times-Union, while with the Voting Integrity Project in 2000, von Spakovsky favored efforts to keep candidates of the Green Party off of the Georgia Ballot:

Restrictive ballot access explains why nearly 80 percent of the state is represented by a legislator who doesn't have an opponent Tuesday, Forren said. The situation suits major-party incumbents, he said.

"They don't want anyone else mucking up their power or they don't want anyone mucking up their balance of power," he said.

"More people might show up to vote if they had so many choices that one was likely to represent their unique views, "Forren said.

"But having more politicians from different parties could actually frustrate voters more and depress turnout," cautions Hans A. von Spakovsky, executive director of the Voter Integrity Project.

"People already have frustration at the difficulty at getting government action," he said. "If our party system were fractured into more and smaller parties. It would be much tougher to get anything done."

In 2001, von Spakovsky was appointed to the Fulton County Registration and Election Board, which runs elections in Atlanta.

In mid-2001, an OpEd in the Atlanta Journal Constitution entitled ELECTION ILLS: Tallying only 'real' votes the best idea noted that von Spakovsky lobbied Senators Christopher Dodd and Max Cleland for stricter voting rules, railing against the motor voter law and indicating the voter registration rolls were in dire need of being "fixed" . Von Spakovsky noted that:

"One of the biggest threats to voter rights and election integrity today is the condition of our voter registration rolls," von Spakovsky told Dodd. "Many jurisdictions now have more registered names on their voter rolls than they have voting-age population within their borders."

"When combined with absentee voting, an individual can register and cast an absentee ballot without any election official ever seeing him."


According to a June 2007 McClatchy article by Greg Gordon, while at the Department of Justice, von Spakovsky implemented these views, refusing, along with then-Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Alex Acosta to take action when advocacy groups presented him with "evidence that hundreds of public-assistance agencies had illegally failed to offer voter registration to their mostly poor and minority clients."

Here is a sneak peak at Lambert's coverage of van Spakovsky's tenure with the Department of Justice:

Von Spakovsky approved the mid-census redistricting in Texas that was engineered by Tom Delay - which the U.S. Supreme Court later held in violation of the Voting Rights Act of 1965.  A December 12, 2003 Justice Department Memorandum indicates that von Spakovsky and Brad Schlozman (who later became US Attorney for the Western District of Missouri) overrode seven DOJ voting rights experts who indicated that the Texas redistricting violated the Voting Rights Act.  According to the Lone Star Project (.pdf linked above):

About the Author: Adam Lambert is a tax consultant living and working in the New York City area. Blogging under the name "clammyc", he has researched and written extensively on issues involving Iraq, the Bush administration and the "war on terror," the US attorney purge and election fraud issues.

ePluribus Contributors: jenn718, standingup, wanderindiana, Publius Revolts, cho and  roxy

If you like what ePMedia's been doing with research, reviews and interviews, please consider donating to help with our efforts.

Originally posted to ePluribus Media on Mon Jun 11, 2007 at 04:05 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site