Skip to main content

Begin with a voice solemnly reading off excerpts from the just released report on the CIA's wrongdoing.  Show imagery of people assassinated, imprisoned or tortured during the period described.  

Cut to a clip of W talking about how he should be trusted with extraordinary powers.

End with a black screen with a stark question being read aloud: "Considering what happened the last time we trusted a President with extraordinary power, why should we trust one again?"

Originally posted to gitaiba on Mon Jun 25, 2007 at 03:04 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Diary? (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    cfk

    I think this belongs more in the open thread discussion.

    Interesting 'commercial' nonetheless.

    •  I don't get to very many open threads, so I am (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Lujane

      grateful for this diary on an important topic.

      "Other cultures are not failed attempts at being you. They are unique manifestations of the human spirit." Wade Davis

      by cfk on Mon Jun 25, 2007 at 04:06:49 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Go for it (0+ / 0-)

    Why is they now releasing the dirty secrets of the old CIA?

    The spin they are putting on this is:  we (the Intelligence community) are getting out into public view the mis- or bad deeds of the long-ago CIA .  We've been asked to do this for a long time by scholars and it's time to come clean.  We really want to show that we are open and transparent.  We're really good guys now.

    The reality is different.  There are a number of motivations behind this voluntary release of information.  After all, nobody forced them to do this.  So why are they doing it?  I believe the reasons are these:

    1.  The project of this administration has been to dismantle what remains of the old CIA with its roots in white-shoe Ivy League types and links to the State Department, replacing it with a more easily-controlled, more secretive military intelligence apparatus.  Note that the lead spook is now military-- Air Force Lt. Gen. Michael Hayden, former head of the NSA.  To discredit the CIA they are releasing evidence of extra-legal, even criminal acts.  Bad CIA.  (Never mind that most of what is being released was already in the public domain, thanks to the hearings of the Senator Frank Church committee in the 1970's.)   One doesn't have to have affection for the CIA to see that what is being substituted could well be worse.
    1.  Another motivation for the current information disclosure of "the Family Jewels," as they are calling it (got to get a sexy title in there, right, spin doctors?) is to justify current clandestine, illegal operations.   See-- we've been doing it for decades.  Nothing really new.  Get used to it.
    1.  Still another motivation is probably diversionary.  Get our attention off the Plame outing and extraordinary rendition (i.e., kidnapping), some of whose practitioners are on trial in absentia in Italy.

    The big question is, what are they doing right now that is unconstitutional, illegal and immoral?  You can be sure they won't release anything about this, any time soon.  Oh where is our equivalent of the courageous Senator Frank Church?

    Of course there's no such thing as evolution. If there were, there wouldn't be a Republican Party.

    by djohnutk on Mon Jun 25, 2007 at 04:52:05 PM PDT

    •  Agreed (0+ / 0-)

      As an edit, when asking the last questions, we could show Abu Ghraib pictures, particularly the innocent detainee who died in custody, headlines about secret prisons, and excerpts from the recent SC decision about enemy combatants.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site