Plato had it right a long time ago: "Those who SEEK power are invariably the least fit to hold and wield it."
Billary (co-enablers Bill and Hillary) are BOTH consummate narcissists, megalomaniacs, liars, control-freaks, manipulators and even psychopaths.
My mother used to refer to elections as "Moron Censuses". Her argument was that it was not only the vote for a particular candidate that registered a person as a moron in the census, but for her, any vote for any candidate had that result given how U.S. elections, since the founding of this plutocracy masquerading as a republic, wind up as basically rigging votes and from backroom-pols-rigged menus of "choice"
That Bill Clinton has the support he still has in the Democratic Party, and that Hillary has the standing she has in the present polls, is a profound testimony to just how many profoundly stupid and/or single-issue-obsessed people inhabit America as well as the Democratic Party.
Plato's Axiom was based on some old-fashioned logic of many faiths including secular humanism: Since most people do not want others to have arbitrary and capricious power over them, what kind of person, self-selects/annoints himself/herself as a "leader" (candidate), self-credentials himself/herself as the "best" among the possible candidates (braggadacio), and then actively SEEKS, over others, what he or she does not want exercized over him or her--POWER? Answer? A narcissist, megalomaniac, psychopath, a user (of people and causes) and a supreme egotist.
We hear the refrain "Clinton lied, but no one died". Really? How many people know that Clinton launched his own "Wag-the-Dog" on two nights in December of 1998, at the height of the Monica scandal, using, in two nights, almost 100 more cruise missiles than were dropped in the whole 1991 Iraq War (415 vs 317)? And that was on all innocents on targets misidentified through bogus intelligence (Fiasco by Thomas Ricks). How many people know that Clinton's Monica business, which not only undercut Gore and helped to bring in Bush and all the carnage he has brought, was also known by the Israelis, who had tapped Monica's phone long before Linda Tripp and who used it to blackmail Clinton to call off a mole hunt for a high-level Mossad operative code-named "Mega" (still possibly in the Bush administration) that has had an effect on the launching and duration of the present Iraq War (see Gideon's Spies: The Secret History of the Mossad by Gordon Thomas).
And now Clinton has his new book out "Giving: How Anyone Can Change". Notice the disconnect between the left and right sides of the colon in the title? The only "giving" or "changing" Bill Clinton does is that which rehabilitates Clinton's image in history and for purposes of Hillary's run for the presidency. The worst torture for a narcissist is non-attention and being forced to "fade away" fom public attention. Clinton is on record that if he could, he would like to run for the presidency perpetually for life (more supreme arrogance). But how does a narcissist, obsessed with first even getting into the history books, and then, with what the history books will say about him, control his image in history especially after his death? Well that is what presidential libraries are all about; along with monuments, buildings and "doctrines" named after oneself, children and successors etc are all about.
And look at Hillary. She touts her "experience" over other candidates. What experience is that? She counts as her own government "experience" her proximity to Bill, while he was president during which time her only major initiative, at least associated with her, was a failure: Universal Access to Health Care. And apparently she was not "close" enough to Bill to know about--so she claims--his diddling of Monica and who knows who else--even with her own secret service detail.
Hillary's other "experience" is as a carpetbagger in New York using the trust of the voters of New York in the same way that Clinton used the various "openings" of Monica. She drops into New York where she had never lived, just like another narcissist and megalomaniac with a grotesque sense of entitlement named Bobby Kennedy, and then, runs for a second term knowing full-well she would never plan to finish it as she planned to breach her six-year contract with the voters of New York for her own run at the history books.
People, their issues, cares, troubles, trials, tribulations, fears, tragedies, etc are all just stage-props for these two--to be used for photo-ops and other theatrics and then to be summarily dropped as fast as they were picked up to be used.
Anyone who sees them should hit them with the hardest questions possible and then you will see the real them come out. Watch Bill Clinton's eyes and jaw when anyone gets anywhere near the Monica thing. You can see real hatred and what he is really all about in his eyes and reactions even with relatively tame questions. Like all narcissists and megalomaniacs, they want it all and to be able to control it all--even the history books after their deaths. Same with Hillary. These are scum and should be treated as such by anyone serious in the Democratic Party.
Ask Hillary: "If you can count, as your OWN "vast" experience in government, your proximity to your husband when he was president, how "close" could you have been if you did not know he was diddling Monica right there in the White House and especially with your having your own secret service detail?
Ask Bill:
"As a result of your work on AIDS, have you come to any new appreciation of just how reckless, self-indulgent, compromising and dangerous was your obvious unprotected sex--or whatever you call it and whatever is is--with Ms Lewinsky and did you get an AIDS test before resuming any relations with Hillary or others?"
How can anyone really say your lies did not cost lives when it was your psychopathic lying (" I did not have sexual relatiions with THAT woman, Ms Lewinsky, I did not tell her to lie...) and totally reckless and self-indulgent behavior that was instrumental in undercutting Gore enough to make Bush look almost presidential and was instrumental in someoneone as dumb as Bush being able to steal the first election?
Or ask him is your present Bush-Clinton Foundation not really nothing more than an edifice for two old narcissists and megalomaniacs who do not know how to fade graciously from public life and the spotlight, and possibly also an instrument lobbying for a Nobel Peace Prize which would be like giving Ted Bundy a prize for great contributions to women's rights?"