Skip to main content

So often people of all political persuasions try to elevate military personnel to superhuman status and grant them unquestioned respect simply because of their chosen profession.  This also includes police officers and firefighters and generally anyone that dons a uniform in service to their country or their local community.  The recent Congressional condemnation of the Moveon organization because they dared to impugn a general is a good illustration of our warped need to create heroes where none really exist.

While overall these organization certainly rate our intense thanks and support for doing the dirty work the rest of us often take for granted, we can never remove the individuality factor from our daily assessments of their actions.  Nations throughout history have experienced the perils of suppressing analysis and criticism of their authoritarian groups.  

I don't know General Petreaus but I do know human beings and I've seen what military service can do to them.  I spent an enlistment in the U.S. Navy as a nuclear reactor technician right after the Vietnam War.  I've lived under the Uniform Code Of Military Justice (UCMJ) and saw my Constitutional rights evaporate as my hair fell to the floor.  I no longer had the right to freely speak my mind publicly if my thoughts ran counter to the mission set down by the Commander in Chief without the possibility of severe retribution. I might add that my service did not include combat (other than being a Cold Warrior) so I imagine the pressures are even greater when bullets are flying.

I found myself among not just a band of true patriots but a very mixed bag of humans there for a variety of reasons.  The percentages of good and bad were not what I had experienced in civilian life.  Despite meeting some incredible individuals, a good portion of people I saw around me were from the bottom tier of society, often the types that would cause you pause if you passed them on a darkened street.  I suppose I somewhat expected that in the ranks of people that would be on the front lines armed to the teeth dodging bullets but I was shocked to see that some of that type slowly moved their way up the chain of command and were in positions of incredible power over their underlings.  

By the end of my time I understood how these pathological types could rise up the ranks.  Despite the service requiring good behavior and knowledge of their particular task, part of the formula simply rewarded time in service, an element essential to a system consisting of volunteers.  I found the truly bad leaders probably stayed in the military because, at the end of their first term, they realized they didn't have the skills and leadership abilities to prosper in the real world.  

Now of course that didn't fit all "lifers".  There were some amazing people I served under that would have risen to the top of any profession they chose and they truly believed in the purpose of their career but I found this to be a glaring exception and not the rule.  I met a whole lot of bullies and "little chicken-shit ass-kissers" in the officer corps so when Admiral Fallon used that eloquent phrase it did not surprise me at all.  Does General Petreaus fit that quote?  Who knows except the people that serve with him daily.  My guess is he's a complex human being with elements of good and bad and his ethics vary like any flawed human being.

That's the operative phrase in this essay - human being.  Our generals deserves no more respect, admiration, or immunity from criticism than your neighbor who goes to work everyday to support his family or the weatherman on TV who gets the forecast wrong.  Debate, often stinging and heated, is part of the job, part of life, and those with too thin a skin to take it have no business being entrusted to put lives into the path of cannons.

Originally posted to artmartin on Sun Sep 23, 2007 at 09:36 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Its the ignored by Daddy thing (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    bluewolverine, North Country Dem

    Its the myth of the best rising to the top in an org.
    When the reality is its the brown nosing and who you know that really gets them up there into the stratosphere.
    That and the worship of father figures in shiny impressive uniforms, I would imagine the worst uniform fetish people were ignored by their busy fathers when they were kids.
    Applies to Cops as well, feeble minded people go weak at the knees.

    -4.75 -7.54 "OK, joke's over. Put back the Constitution!"

    by Ferrofluid on Sun Sep 23, 2007 at 09:53:26 AM PDT

  •  exactly (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    bluewolverine, carver

    Being a little more "religious" than most of those in Daily Kos, I have opined in the past that we in America are in danger of, and probably already done so, made an Idol out of the military and the "GI Joes" who serve in it.  It has a lot to do with the cult of masculinity.  The military, with all its technological weaponry and male bonding and combat, both real and simulated, is the perfect breeding ground for making the young warrior into a "god."  And we have done so, to disastorous effects.  Another Strassian manipulation that works big time.  We have made the military an idol, and we have turned a man into a false god and idol.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site