Skip to main content

Originally published on Citizen Orange

Instead of trying to get through to anti-migrant advocates, I thought I'd bring attention to the leaders that represent them.  Again, there's no real effective list of biggest migrant employers.  Yet there are some prominent pro-migrant businesses, businesses anti-migrant advocates have highlighted themselves, that are contributing substantial amounts of money to anti-migrant politicians.  I'll explain further in the post, but in the meantime check out this youtube video I made drawing attention to the political contributions of the Bank of America Corporation State and Federal Political Action Committee:

Originally published on Citizen Orange

I've often wondered where the indignant self-righteousness of anti-migrant advocates comes from.  It is impossible to live in the United States without deriving some benefit from the work of migrants.  There has been no effective effort to catalog and boycott businesses that employ migrants.  Even if someone tried to avoid the benefits of migrant labor, it would be near impossible to live a happy and healthy life in the U.S.

But instead of trying to get through to anti-migrant advocates, I thought I'd bring attention to the leaders that represent them.  Again, there's no real effective list of biggest migrant employers.  Yet there are some prominent pro-migrant businesses, businesses anti-migrant advocates have highlighted themselves, that are contributing substantial amounts of money to anti-migrant politicians.  I'll explain further in the post, but in the meantime check out this youtube video I made drawing attention to the political contributions of the Bank of America Corporation State and Federal Political Action Committee:

As politicians continue to use migrants for their own political purposes, a pattern is emerging.  Migrants are bearing the brunt of their political posturing, while the people that hire and benefit from them go without punishment.  See my post on the New Bedford raid if there's any question about that.  I'm just wondering how long it's going to take before anti-migrant advocates realize what kind of leaders and policies they are empowering with their actions.

I was just trying to brush up on my video making skills when I made the above video.  The actual story, of course, is more complicated than that.  Bank of America has been singled out for anti-migrant ire because the company loosened credit card requirements.  In actuality, the bashing of Bank of America fits the pattern of bashing migrants over the people that hire and benefit from them.  People would rather prevent migrants from getting a credit card than punish the people that give them jobs, or give them opportunities in the countries that they come from if they really wanted to fix the problem. 

Still filtering through the Center for New Community's report entitled Nativism in the House, I was able to find a host of guilty business contributing to the 2006 campaigns of anti-migrant politicians.  As I state in the video, Bank of America donated href="02,250, or approximately 13% of the caucus's total donations. This makes Bank of America one of the top 150 political action committees contributing to the very same people that, in theory, should be against Bank of America. 

The report specifically singles out another company, Home Depot, which has had an ongoing problem with day laborers:

Consider the Home Depot Inc. PAC, which gave $130,500 in campaign
contributions to HIRC politicians, more than 17% of its total
donations. Yet, because of its non-hostile attitude toward
day-laborers, Home Depot has been under repeated attack by
anti-immigrant organizations.


Raising Kaine (here and here) has also been doing some good work exposing these relationships, specifically Smithfield Foods, which has been caught hiring migrants staying in the country illegallyHuman Rights Watch has a report documenting the abuses of Smithfield Foods and the migrants they employ.  Here in Massachusetts I've seen people workers tout a Smithfield Justice campaign.  I don't understand how you can profess to be "Pro-America" at the same time that you accept contributions from this company. 

Read what Lowell, from Raising Kaine, has to say.

By now, I'm sure we all know that Smithfield Foods has been and
continues to be a major employer of illegal immigrants.  For instance,
see here and here and of course here.


So who are the main beneficiaries in Virginia of contributions by
illegal-hiring and union-busting Smithfield Foods?  Let's go to VPAP:


*Over the years, Smithfield Foods has given $518,893 to Republicans, $157,250 to Democrats.  That's 77% to Republicans, 23% to Democrats.


*This year alone, Smithfield Foods has given $73,650 to Republicans,
including Dave Albo ($1,000), Ken Cuccinelli ($500), Jeannemarie
Devolites Davis ($1,000), Bob McDonnell ($20,000), Bill Bolling's
Building a Better Virginia PAC ($5,000), Bill Howell's Dominion
Leadership Trust PAC ($2,500), the Republican Party of Virginia
($10,000), the House Republican Campaign Committee ($10,250), and the
Virginia Senate Republican Leadership Trust ($10,000). 


*True, Smithfield has given to Democrats as well, but far less than to Republicans (a 3:1 ratio).  Also, it's the Republicans
who are the main ones railing against illegal immigrants, yet taking
wads of money from companies that hire illegal immigrants. 


So here's the bottom line: Republicans are hypocrites
on this issue, big time.  If not, they should refuse any money from
companies, like Smithfield Foods, that employs and exploits illegal
immigrants.  They should return any money they've already received.  If
not, we should all feel free to ignore every word they have to say on
this issue, because they're completely full of it.

Lowell also has another post at Raising Kaine explaining the systemic nature of this issue:

According to NPR,  of the 12 million illegal immigrants in the United States today, "[m]ore than half work in construction, manufacturing or leisure and hospitality."


Now, let's look at where the money from those industries went in 2006:


CONSTRUCTION

Republicans: $38,129,511

Democrats: $16,154,953

That's 70% to Republicans, 30% to Democrats


MANUFACTURING

Food Products Manufacturing

Republicans: $1,511,309

Democrats: $621,898

That's 71% to Republicans, 29% to Democrats


Chemical & Related Manufacturing

Republicans: $4,570,892

Democrats: $1,379,789

That's 75% to Republicans, 25% to Democrats


Pharmaceutical Manufacturing

Republicans: $7,731,388

Democrats: $3,158,977

That's 70% to Republicans, 30% to Democrats


LEISURE AND HOSPITALITY

Restaurants & Bars

Republicans: $5,891,298

Democrats: $2,084,281

That's 73% to Republicans, 26% to Democrats


Getting the picture?  That's right, the industries that are the biggest
employers of illegal immigrants in this country are also heavy donors
to Republicans.  Why do Republicans take money from industries that
"break the law," as they like to claim?  To throw their own idiotic
phrase right back at them, "what part of 'illegal' don't Republicans
understand?"


If I haven't made it clear enough yet, anti-migrant politicians are taking anti-migrant advocates for a ride.  They are bashing migrants at the same time that they use the contributions from the people that employ them to re-elect themselves.  Which is why I ask anti-migrant advocates, are these politicians acting in your interest?



 

Originally posted to kyledeb on Wed Oct 17, 2007 at 01:01 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (6+ / 0-)

    Hope you enjoy the youtube video.

    The U.S. "immigration debate" has lost sight of justice.

    by kyledeb on Wed Oct 17, 2007 at 01:03:29 PM PDT

    •  Glad to see ya here ... (0+ / 0-)

      ... and have to say your new website looks fabulous!

      To me, the biggest problem anti-migrants have is to say that because someone is here illegally that justifies what is being done to them, illegal raids, separating parents from children, drugging, detention centers, all inhumane actions which have never reflected American values.

      It's one thing to disagree on policy.  But to condone the grave injustices done by our dear old DOJ and ICE in the name of "legality" is, imo, simply mad.

      There is never a justifiable reason to torture, there is never a justifiable reason to treat someone as an animal and not a human being.

  •  It's hard parsing the meaning of these stats (0+ / 0-)

    Consider the Home Depot Inc. PAC, which gave $130,500 in campaign contributions to HIRC politicians, more than 17% of its total donations.

    That would only be meaningful if the the HIRC is less than 17% of the congress, and if none of the HIRC'ers sit on committees directly related to HD business, etc.

    They are bashing migrants at the same time that they use the contributions from the people that employ them to re-elect themselves.

    The implication is that they're taking money but not actually doing anything.  Yet many of them are actively calling for stepped up enforcement and trying to pass legislation to that effect, which would seem to undercut your argument.

    •  It's about cause and effect (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Nightprowlkitty, Sentido

      Effectively all of the enforcement measures are affecting migrants, when they should be targeting the people that employ and benefit from them.

      I mean burrow owl are you considering the people your supporting with your arguments?  Do you realize your giving power to people like Tom Tancredo, who very much believes anything contrary to western civilization is harmful to the country?

      I seriously don't understand how someone can call themselves a Democrat and advocate positions like you do.  It plays into the extreme right wing of the Republican party.

      The U.S. "immigration debate" has lost sight of justice.

      by kyledeb on Wed Oct 17, 2007 at 03:02:59 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Hypocrisy of Bank of America. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Nightprowlkitty

    Bank of America outsourced their entire technology, development, support, infrastructure maintenance work to IBM US. Then, IBM US outsourced this same work to IBM India. Bank Of America fired 500 American employees, with on-an-average experience of 10 years. IBM India, recruited 1000 Indian programmers with 0 years of experience, fresh graduates coming out of Engineering school, for the same jobs into their office in Bangalore. America lost 500 jobs, India gained 1000 jobs. American economy lost taxes from 500 people, India gained taxes from additional 1000 being employed.
    And here comes the funny part. So as to cater and service the growing Hispanic population in America, with Bank of America’s different products, like loans, credit-cards, mortgages, home-equity loans etc. Bank Of America wanted to build a system entirely in Spanish language. So they hired an Indian IT outsourcing/consulting firm Infosys. Infosys, immediately brought their "specialists" (no-experience fresh engineering graduates) from India into US to study that project work. Then those Infosys India employees took that entire work to India and outsourced it to Infosys Mexico located in Mexico City, because Infosys India employees didn’t know how to read/write/speak Spanish and Infosys Mexico employees are all Mexicans. Bank Of America paid 85 $/hour to Infosys "specialists" from India. Infosys "specialists" from India, paid 12 $/hour to Infosys Mexico employees for doing all the project work and shipping it back to Bank of America.
    And this same Bank of America is giving funds to Tancredo because they want to open more branches in Colorado so as to cater growing hispanic population????!!!!

  •  Brian Bilbray (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Nightprowlkitty

    One of his big campaign contributors owns a hotel that apparently hires undocumneted workers, which was fine until the workers tried to organize. The hotel owner calledhis good buddy, Rep. Bilbray, who contacted ICE and had the employees "auditied". Of course Bilbray used to be a lobbyist for the anti immigrant organization FAIR and campaigned on an anti immigrant platform, but had no problem taking money from an employer of undocumented workers and helping their employer intimidate them.  

    http://www.calitics.com/...

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site