Daily Kos

Bush Authoritarianism: Blackwater+Amway=GOP, Pt. 3

Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 05:33:35 PM PDT

The administration of George W. Bush has pursued an agenda and engaged in a governance style that breaks radically from any previous administration.  Some of the characteristics of what I’m calling Bush Authoritarianism are variants of previous ideological beliefs or forms of governance.  Many others are the realization of decades of marketing and propaganda by the interlinked network of rightwing donors, foundations, think tanks, marketing and media operations, opinion leaders, political operatives, and allies within the Republican party.  

One of the main hallmarks of Bush Authoritarianism is a variant of privatization, in which public goods or services supplied directly by government employees are "outsourced" to a private company, which takes tax dollars, but over which the government has much less control than public employees performing the same task.  Privatization has been happening at all levels of government for a couple of decades.  In some cases it’s warranted and in the best interests of citizens and taxpayers.  But often, privatization results in inferior good or services, higher costs to taxpayers, and diminished accountability to the government and the public.  

An extreme version of privatization has accelerated during the Bush administration: the privatization of warfare.  Privatizing war is at the cutting edge of Bush Authoritarianism, and Blackwater, whose business practices and niche I discussed last week, is an archetypal "winner" in the new authoritarian system emerging under the Bush administration.  Blackwater is not the only example, however; it is simply one of the more public and extreme examples of Bush’s base of support and the recipients of his governance, which transfers public moneys previously spent on government employees to perform government services, to private entities over which the government can exercise much less authority and  accountability.  

Blackwater CEO Erik Prince is a product of the world of ultra-conservative donors who’ve funded the vast right wing conspiracy.  His father, auto parts mogul Edgar Prince, was one of the largest funders of the right wing movement.  Notably, he was an original funder of James Dobson’s Family Research Council, and the younger Prince counts such major rightwing Christian operatives as Chuck Colson and Gary Bauer as close friends.  

Another major emphasis in Bush Authoritarianism is political and financial support from, and governmental support to the owners and investors in private enterprises that produce little in the way of concrete goods and provide little or no support to their employees (such as health insurance, pensions, or even the payment of payroll taxes).  Some of the key industries for support to George W. Bush and the GOP have been the "extractive" industries (such as oil, coal and timber), industries significantly affected by government regulation (such as freight rail) and low-wage industries that are often hostile to unionization (such as fast food, retail, nursing homes and unskilled construction).  

In many ways, the Alticor corporation is the private sector counterpart to Blackwater as a producer and a beneficiary of the authoritarianism of the Bush administration.  Like Blackwater, Alticor—best known by one of it’s primary subsidiaries, Amway—provides little support and maintains few ties to the contractors who make it money.  Its founders and the heirs to the fortune it created are ultra-conservatives who’ve been among the most important funders to the right wing ideological and political network.  The company and the foundations created by the recipients of its profits are based in West Michigan.  It is highly controversial and has had numerous legal problems.  And beyond the various affinities of ideology, politics and business operations, Alticor and Blackwater are directly related by marriage: Alticor/Amway heir Dick DeVos is married to the former Betsy Prince, older sister to Blackwater CEO Erik Prince.  

  • ::

Part 1
Part 2

When George W. Bush became President, for many it was an opportunity they had sought for decades, the opportunity to radically remake the federal government, and by extension, the entire economy and the entire country.  In the next installments, I will lay out in much more detail the financial and political history that connects Blackwater, Amway, the rightwing political network, the Republican party and the Bush administration, and that provided many of the ideas, blueprints and implementors for Bush’s brand of authoritarianism.  But as in the previous installment, where I described Blackwater as an archetypical corporation connected with Bush Authoritarianism, tonight I will give an overview of Amway.  

Alticor is the parent company of group of companies of which two are Amway and Quixtar, both of which operate on a business model known as multi-level marketing (MLM).  Other examples of businesses that use multi-level marketing are Avon and Tupperware.  However, multi-level market is a common model used by more dubious ventures, like many non-traditional medical products.  Critics often characterize multi-level marketing operations as ponzi or pyramid schemes.  

Here’s how Russ Belant, a longtime researcher of the far right in America, describes how Amway works:

As a multilevel marketing system, each Amway distributor has someone over them that gets a cut of their sales. The direct distributor is the first supervisory level where they get cuts on all sales below them. Because they have recruited enough people, they just make money off them, usually friends and relatives. As they grow more groups they proceed upline, becoming ruby, pearl, emerald, diamond, double diamond and finally crown ambassador distributors. Only about 1% make it to the first level or above. The highest level only had two people in the world. So the 99% at the basic level, who average about $130 per month, are providing all the income for the rest of the upline. The upline’s only job is to keep the people at the bottom motivated to keep selling Amway. So the upline folks suck up part of their meager earnings of their distributors by selling them motivational tapes, books and $100 tickets to rallies. One Crown Ambassador earned an estimated $35 million per year, not by selling Amway, but by selling motivation "tools."

Amway rallies are heavily themed with patriotic appeals and or prosperity gospel (god wants you to be rich) and energetic music, so that you come away seeing Amway standing with moral rectitude, righteousness and purpose. When most fail to earn the thousands per month they were lead to believe was realizable, they certainly do not blame Amway - they blame themselves.

Like Blackwater, which has few permanent employees but instead serves primarily as a middleman between the federal government and the individual contractors for whom it does not provide permanent health insurance, pensions or on whom it even pays payroll taxes, Amway has almost no lasting responsibilities to the people who provide the company’s profits.  They produce almost nothing, and instead just move money around, primarily upward from individuals at the bottom of the pyramid to the top of the company, who are now primarily the heirs of the company’s founders, Richard DeVos Sr and Jay Van Andel.  

Businesses that operated this way are generally considered pyramid schemes.  Pyramid schemes are generally against the law, and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) warns consumers about being scammed by MLM schemes.  Amway is technically a legal pyramid scheme, but a prominent expert in the Racketeering and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) had a different take on Amway: he likened Amway to the mafia:

It is my opinion that the Amway business is run in a manner that is parallel to that of major organized crime groups, in particular the Mafia. The structure and function of major organized crime groups, generally consisting of associated enterprises engaging in patterns of legal and illegal activity, was the prototype forming the basis for federal and state racketeering legislation that I have been involved in drafting. The same structure and function, with associated enterprises engaging in patterns of legal and illegal activity, is found in the Amway business.

At various times, the FTC has found Amway in violation of the law.  Again, Russ Bellant:

The Federal Trade Commission ( FTC ) investigated Amway and found fraud and deception in Amway’s methods in 1979...

In 1989, when Amway attempted a hostile takeover of Avon, the cosmetics company rebuffed Amway, calling them in a public letter a company "marked by zealotry" and "morally bankrupt and criminally corrupt," according to the Detroit Free Press.

When Avon called Amway criminally corrupt, they referred to settlements that Amway had to pay for systematically defrauding the Canadian government of customs duties and taxes. Its Canadian subsidiary paid $21 million in fines, while the Ada-based headquarters paid $38.1 million in 1989, the highest in Canadian history. They also referenced the decision of the Federal Trade Commission and the Wisconsin Attorney General’s office that charged Amway "with price fixing and misleading claims in connection with the recruitment of distributors."

As the Amway name has become increasingly tainted with the public, Alticor has shifted emphasis to Quixtar.  But as NBC’s Dateline showed in 2004, Quixtar operates in essentially the same was as Amway, with most people making no money but providing the people at the top of the pyramid with profits from the sales of tickets to revival meetings, books, promotional tapes and the like.  

Beyond the connection of Betsy Prince marrying the son of Amway’s co-founder, what, you might wonder, links Amway so tightly to Bush Authoritarianism?  A few examples, which I will explore further next week:

The MLM business model used by Amway was the foundation of much of the GOP’s get out the vote (GOTV) operation in 2004.

Amway parlayed it’s MLM network to elect one it’s own to Congress through a pyramid fundraising model using the very same people it uses to send profits to the corporate leadership.  The reward for this and other political efforts was a multi-million dollar tax break for Amway’s China-related activities.  

The Richard and Helen DeVos Foundation is one of the pillars of the right wing, in most years giving upwards of $20 million to conservative causes.  The Dick and Betsy DeVos foundation has also become a major donor of rightwing causes, especially privatization and school vouchers.  

Betsy DeVos has twice served as the chair of the Michigan Republican party, and Dick DeVos was the 2006 GOP nominee for Governor.  

Finally, there’s the direct money: According to a report by the Center for Public Integrity, in the 2004 election cycle, members of the Van Andel and DeVos families were the second, third and fifth largest donors to the Republican party.  

Blackwater and Amway are not just model corporations for an era or radical privatization and corporate abdication of any ties or responsibilities to its employees.  They are in many ways creators and beneficiaries of the entire hard-right authoritarian approach to politics and governance embodied in the administration of George W. Bush.  

[Many of the links in this piece were discovered via the dozens of excellent posts that can be found at Michigan Liberal.  In particular, bloggers DemWave  and Nirmal wrote several good, well-sourced pieces that I found very valuable]

Tags: Bush Administration, Authoritarianism, Blackwater, Mercenaries, Privatization, Amway, DeVos, Van Andel (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 85 comments

  •  HRC was right (15+ / 0-)

    This is part and parcel of the right-wing conspiracy. A conspiracy of corporations, right-wing think tanks, judges and elected officials. Now they can add military muscle to their gang.

    •  They have always had muscle. Watergate.... (0+ / 0-)

      The killers and overseas gangsters have always been on the rightie side of the ledger.

      Watergate was doubly strange because CIA had an inside guy at the burglary.

      But the whole Liddy "Plumbers" operation was a few/no guns version of what you are describing with this diary. Nasty criminals all around.

      BTW: the intercity chess league team from Washington, D.C., was named "The Plumbers."

      Fittingly, this team won the 1976 national championship. Phone matches, before the internet.

      Chess mag's cover, June 1976, had the whole gang, sharing hand holds on a plumber's helper. (That's a plunger for unclogging toilets.)

      Dixie Chicks, Amy Winehouse, Imus, and Rev. Wright. Overcome our evil with good.

      by vets74 on Mon Oct 22, 2007 at 06:30:42 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  ITS all About the $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ (4+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    LynChi, vets74, dolphin777, JeffW

    The BV$H admin. is  $$$ X power X2.

    "It's better to die on your feet then live on your knees" E. Zapata

    by Blutodog on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 05:40:15 PM PDT

  •  isnt amway a pyramid scheme? (6+ / 0-)

    is america now a privatized pyramid scheme backed with private muscle?

  •  The cult of the private sector (19+ / 0-)

    The entire thing rests on the belief that the private sector is inherently superior to the public sector. That "business" or the "private sector" can do everything better, faster, cheaper.

    Sure, to some extent that can be true, but they have severely over-reached in this strategy. Outsourcing some functions of the government can be OK (and I'm thinking like severely technical things, like IT support, which may be better serviced by outside experts), but when you're outsourcing wars and prisons and things for which government was created in the first place - well, then, you're abdicating the country's responsibilities.

    And you only open the door for corruption, cronyism and failure.

    Transparency and oversight are the keys to the kingdom in a democracy. This makes it much harder.

    •  Do you know why? (8+ / 0-)

      That "business" or the "private sector" can do everything better, faster, cheaper.   Sure, to some extent that can be true,

      Government employees, good ones and there are many, are public servants entrusted with the public's money to do the publics work.  Because of this, they are totally accountable to the government and the public. They are suppose to be watch dogs and get the job done in an efficient and cost effective manner.  

      "Private sector" on the other hand is faster cheaper because they think that all of that is bull shit.  They are only concerned with profits and increasing profits.  So they eliminate accountability and liability to reduce costs and increase profits.  Once that is done, they have the key to the castle and an attitude that is "They are private firms, and what they do is none of the publics or governments business."    

      Don't ever forget the old chestnut, "you get what you pay ask for".  

      ...once you're willing to say whatever it takes to win, you lose. ~~Dean

      by dkmich on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 06:10:47 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Or belief that Public Sector is to be plundered. (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      pasajero

      Separating the Common Fools from their money.

      Dixie Chicks, Amy Winehouse, Imus, and Rev. Wright. Overcome our evil with good.

      by vets74 on Mon Oct 22, 2007 at 06:32:58 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  DH, this is fascinating information (21+ / 0-)

    Your research is excellent and you've presented the information very clearly.  Thank you for doing so much work.

    These guys are as well organized as I have feared over the years.  

  •  seeds, human genome, LIFE (that's all) (2+ / 0-)

  •  The really interesting connection (4+ / 0-)

    is to the GOTV operation. Thanks for that link.

    Daily Kos used to be worthwhile.

    by andgarden on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 05:48:04 PM PDT

  •  A poem to compliment your great diary: (13+ / 0-)

    scamway

    The NeoCOM (Corporate Owned Media) is Neocon.

    by Brahman Colorado on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 05:49:20 PM PDT

  •  I am just going to say (20+ / 0-)

    that the Amway people are CRAZY.  They scared me to death 15 years ago.  They use the same tactics that we often seen used in conservative political circles...my in-laws became involved with Amway and because I would not consent to buy into it and sell products while I was eight months pregnant with my sixth child they were mad at us for months...they had literally invited us to their home and ambushed us with the Amway people brought in to try to force us to join them.

    Ofcourse, all of these people were right wing Christians.  Scary, scary people.

    •  good point (8+ / 0-)

      this country is FULL of stupid, willfully ignorant, brain dead people. probably about close to half the population. until we fix that its doubtful that much else will get fixed in this country...

      Welcome to the empire. now run away if you can... life is not a dress rehearsal

      by johnfire on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 06:12:21 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  I had some college friends who were in Amway (12+ / 0-)

      and attended some of their functions.  At the time, it was cutting edge wingnuttery.  Anti-gay, conservative Christianity plus free market ideology.  They loved Reagan and hated communism and big government.

      I heard after the Internet took off though that it really hurt their business and I think it's because it gave Amway 'distributors' a way to connect with other weary distributors as well as to find out what is actually going on with their money and also to find out more about the rich people who run the big seminars, etc.  Amway/Quixtar is run like a cult:

      - you need to 'associate' with other Amway people to succeed

      - they have approved reading lists of self-help-type books

      - they encourage you to buy motivational tapes (which seems to be a big income source for the big distributors)

      - you're supposed to follow in the footsteps of your sponsor (who is supposed to follow in the footsteps of his/her sponsor, on up the pyramid)

      I'd be very interested in hearing how Amway's business is actually doing nowadays.  They're a private company so it's tough to get a hold of their financial data but I think their best days are behind them.  I'm sure they still make decent money though and it's probably still a good place to meet honest-to-God wingnuts.

      American overseas? Register to vote at www.VoteFromAbroad.org

      by YoyogiBear on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 06:32:18 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Please cite examples of privatization (7+ / 0-)

    which are "warranted" and "in the best interests of taxpayers and citizens.
    Thanks for your diary.

    •  printing (8+ / 0-)

      ---
      Tired of violent language from right-wing pundits? Buy my book: Outright Barbarous

      by Jeffrey Feldman on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 06:00:08 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Many major cities... (0+ / 0-)

      ...contract private companies to do things like collect garbage or repair streets.

      John McCain is NOT a Bush supporter. He may be a liar, a pig, an idiot, a Bush supporter, but he is NOT a porn star.

      by DH from MD on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 06:11:55 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  Yep, you are right (2+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        Janet Strange, Halcyon

        and these are just the types of enterprises which are easily corrupted to the detriment of the citizen-taxpayer; and the benefit of a select few.

      •  more expensively than if they did it themselves. (6+ / 0-)

        Via one of the Teamster activists around here, we learn:

        The CEO of Waste Management earned $600 million in compensation.  WM has 50,000 employees.  That CEO's pay translates to $4 per hour for each of the WM employees, and doesn't include WM's actual profit (return to shareholders) which would no doubt push the figure higher.  

        So any city that wanted to run its own sanitation department could either save the equivalent of $4 / hour on wages, or pay it directly to the workers, or allocate it to other parts of the city budget.  Instead of hiring WM.  

        It is necessarily true that the requirement to earn a profit for shareholders results in a higher cost contract, than when that requirement is not present.

        Theoretically this could be taken out of context as an arguement for socialism, which I (libertarian democrat) don't buy.  But clearly it should be applied to core city services, including sanitation and street maintenance.

      •  garbage collection privatized (3+ / 0-)

        Many major cities.....contract private companies to do things like collect garbage or repair streets

        The result at least in our neighborhood is that instead of one 15-ton diesel garbage hauler making the rounds, half a dozen do it, making half a dozen times the noise, stink, and fuel consumption.  Individual choice (of garbage haulers) has run amok.

        •  That got so bad in my neighborhood... (2+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          dkmich, Coherent Viewpoint

          ...that the homeowners' association decided to have only one contractor for the entire development.  So, the result is that we have a monopoly, but at least there is only one trash pickup per week, instead of multiple ones, which were making for a lot of noise and dust on the dirt roads.

          "Iraq: the bravest 1% fighting for the richest 1%." ~ An Unknown Kossack.

          by Neon Vincent on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 07:25:50 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

    •  I see good examples all the time in my job (7+ / 0-)

      A small village with a limited budget that outsources engineering work to the private sector, rather than pay a full time engineering staff that will still likely lack expertise on some issues, that a private engineering firm will not.

      Or a small governmental unit that pays a private law firm for legal work rather than have in-house counsel, for much the same reason as above.

      These are still examples of privatization, and they are the norm for most local governments.

      A big city can afford an engineering department and a law department.  A small one cannot.

      "The Bible is not my book nor Christianity my profession. I could never give assent to the long, complicated statements of Christian dogma." - Abraham Lincoln

      by Jerry 101 on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 06:15:46 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  This is one thing. (4+ / 0-)

        A small village with a limited budget that outsources

         

        Imo, this is not a good reason to outsource.  The budget is suppose to be adequate to the public need.  War, tax cuts for the rich, and tax abatements to corporations always seem to get paid first.  If, on the other hand, there isn't enough work to warrant an employee that is a good reason to sub-contract.  

        ...once you're willing to say whatever it takes to win, you lose. ~~Dean

        by dkmich on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 06:27:33 PM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  Let Cartoon Peril explain it all to you: (10+ / 0-)

    Iraq and all the darker-skinned people in it, and the oil under their country, are the downline.  They work for nothing except worthless promises from us, the mostly-lighter skinned people, who are their upline.  We get their oil, and they get our bombs.  

    God intended it that way, of course.

    You have exactly 10 seconds to change that look of disgusting pity into one of enormous respect!

    by Cartoon Peril on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 05:59:26 PM PDT

  •  I'm floored (10+ / 0-)

    I find Amway and Focus and Blackwater and the GOP to be
    all distasteful.  Who knew how intertwined they were? Now I know.  

    The GOP as a pyramid scheme.  Little cluster of war profiteers at the top with a big smear of Christianity on top to make it all okay.  

    Excellent diary.  I was reading it aloud to my husband.
    "How are Blackwater and Amway connected?" I called out.

    I'm still shaking my head...

    Why did we bother to beat the Soviet Union if we were just going to become it? Molly Ivins

    by offred on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 06:02:55 PM PDT

  •  I'd call 'em all leeches, except leeches jes (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    YoyogiBear, moosely2006

    suck blood!!

    Aloha .. .. ..

  •  I find marriage you mention very like past (4+ / 0-)

    dynastic pairings of European royals "Divine Right of Kings" practice!  It sure keeps it all in the family!!

    Money!  Power!! Influence!!!

    Aloha .. .. ..

  •  And in Iraq they are exempt from the law (8+ / 0-)

    Employees of private contractors are civilians and cannot be court-martialed.  Where American troops are stationed in countries with established legal systems we have status of forces agreements (SOFA) that govern when military and U.S. civilians attached to the military can be tried in that nation's courts.  The problem is, as far as I know we still don't have a SOFA with Iraq, and for good reason.  I would not trust an Iraqi court at this time to dispense impartial justice, as I would a British or German or Japanese court.  

    If the contractors commit crimes against the United States, for example, stealing from the U.S. government funds, they could be returned to the U.S. and tried in a federal court.  But crimes against foreign nationals in a foreign country are not crimes against the U.S., and if they cannot be tried by the Iraqis, they can commit such crimes without punishment.

    "Great men do not commit murder. Great nations do not start wars." William Jennings Bryan

    by Navy Vet Terp on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 06:19:17 PM PDT

  •  Do they think it will last forever? (7+ / 0-)

    This is a fundamental question that I keep coming back to whenever reading about the entire panoply of bush/republican/conservative corruption and authoritarianism. The corruption is so blatant, so entrenched throughout government, there is no way it can be hidden. Any attempt even to hide/shred the documents would itself be such a massive operation it would stand out.

    Do they think there will never be another Democratic President? Do they, like Hitler, foresee a thousand-year reich? Do they think they can continue to steal elections non-stop into the forseeable future? Do they know something we don't?

    It is easy to drift off into some underworld of conspiracy theory--another stolen presidential election, a coup led by blackwater mercenaries, a "state of emergency" resulting from another terrorist attack in fall 2008.

    The other fear is that, given the $$$ and power available, they will coopt Democratic leaders into just letting it all go under the guise of "healing" and "bipartisanship". Given the performance of our sorry democratic leadership this year, this is a much more likely scenario.

    Let the word go forth from this time and place...that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans--Obama '08

    by Azdak on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 06:44:41 PM PDT

  •  Government (0+ / 0-)

    Of the People,
    By Republicans (and helpful Security State Dems),
    For Corporations,
    Against the People.

    It's called fascism.

    Partisanship is not the heart of politics.  Partisanship is the abdication of politics.

    •  For People Who Require Simplicity, I Suppose So (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      oldjohnbrown, barbwires

      Not for those of us who want to get past cliches and actually understand things.  

      The revolution will not be televised, but we'll analyze it to death at The Next Hurrah.

      by DHinMI on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 07:13:55 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I'd say the nexus between (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        Neon Vincent

        rightwing religion and corporate government, exemplified particularly in the Bushco/Blackwater relationship, is the essence of fascism.

        Cliche?  Here's my working definition:

        Fascism: racist, ethnic, and religious  bigotry, nationalist zenophobia, terror, militarism, and perpetual warfare, fomented and fostered in service of corporate economic and political goals.

        Talk of a third party is premature.  First, we'd need a second.

        •  rightwing dynamism, (0+ / 0-)

          the cult of masculinity, willful ignorance, the cowboy/special forces ethos, the cult of the individual, all add up to a calculated rightwing populism that serves, through mystification, the corporate class at the expense of everyone else; including the vast majority of true believers.

          This is fascism, USA, ca. 2007.

          Rightwing Bushco populism = fascism.  Dems need to stop playing.  

          It's the fascism, stupids!

          •  Yes, but Naomi Wolf really nailed it (2+ / 0-)

            Recommended by:
            Janet Strange, dkmich

            She deconstructs the fascism concept you outlined and redefines what's happening here more with privatization and militarization and authoritarianism as the basis for control, for 'disaster capitalism' in which profiteering from others' misery is a method of control and differs in her analysis from fascism. That doesn't make it better, just different.

            Children in the U.S... detained [against] intl. & domestic standards." --Amnesty International

            by doinaheckuvanutjob on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 09:53:57 PM PDT

            [ Parent ]

            •  late reply, fwiw (0+ / 0-)

              For me, it becomes fascism when you bring in  the populist elements -- the mystifications through which the corporate program is sold.

              There are absolute parallels to earlier, fascist movements.  When Dems buy into any sort of rightwing propaganda, as they have so thoroughly in promoting Bushco's "war" on "terror", it is an absolutely counterproductive act.

              If they aren't fascists. ;)

        •  Bill Moyers did a piece (0+ / 0-)

          on Blackwater Friday night. His guest, don't recall his name, said that Blackwater is really called the Peace something or the other...which would make Erik Prince, the "Prince of Peace."

          Now, if you really want to get wingnuts crazy, tell them that and tell them that this is a sure sign of the antichrist.

  •  Erik Prince is scary (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    western star

    That cat was interviewed on "60 minutes" last week.  Did anyone catch that?  Did you see his eyes?  Talk about wary.  He absolutely gave me the creeps--BIG time!

    "Most women have no idea how much men hate them."--Germaine Greer

    by Diana in NoVa on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 07:12:41 PM PDT

  •  Privatizing education (4+ / 0-)

    is one of the more common and scarier developments over the past few decades, primarily because corporations are to a greater extent determining classroom content. There was a story in our Sunday paper today about the "wonderful businesses" that are contributing to our schools. While I know the schools need bucks, and I generally support no-strings donations from businesses, if you read between the lines in this story, you find that the donations are for "classroom materials" that support corporate views. How much coverage of global warming, for example, will be in those science textbooks provided (and written) by Exxon? Or you read about field trips funded by Wal-Mart to - guess where? - Wal-Mart. A bank provided funds to a school based on how many checking accounts were opened by the students' families. And I won't even get into the cafeterias managed by Taco Bell or Channel One's "news" programs. We're training consumers, not educating citizens.

    "One cannot be pessimistic about the West. This is the native land of hope." Wallace Stegner

    by Mother Mags on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 07:28:11 PM PDT

  •  Look what happens (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Neon Vincent

    when those participating in Amway find out who's really getting fat payments like they were promised:

    http://www.merchantsofdeception.com/...

    The author has been threatened; so has his family, and now they're underground, trying to sue Amway and recoup their losses.

    "Washington, DC: Where Corrupt Officials are discovered daily."

    by The Truth on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 07:32:39 PM PDT

  •  There's also the cultlike element ... (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Neon Vincent

    To Amway. The structure you describe has a lot in common with Scientology.

    Taking another angle, there is also something rather feudal about the whole thing. In fact, feudalism essentially was the privatization of government. Dukes and counts were initially appointive governors. Gradually from the fall of Rome, but especially after Charlemagne, the positions became inheritable - i.e., effectively private property.

    The best fortress is to be found in the love of the people - Niccolo Machiavelli

    by al Fubar on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 07:52:43 PM PDT

  •  Dogemperor has written quite a bit... (4+ / 0-)

    ...on the connections and similarities between the most radical part of the Religious Right and Amway.

    Dominionism's "parallel economy", Pt. 2: Dominionism's Corporate Sponsors

    The very first company she described in the above diary entry was Amway.  She outlined the abusive nature of Amway's business model and its connections to the Religious Right (front organization, funding source, and recruiting instrument).  BTW, the first company mentioned in the comments was Blackwater.

    Also, she has blogged about how similar Amway's style of organization is to Dominionist "cell churches," which have been used to take over or "steeplejack" mainstream Christian churches, the Republican Party, and even the military.

    Dominionist cell churches: a history

    Finally, she has blogged how the "cell church"/pyramid scheme organization shared between Amway and the most radical segment of the Religious Right both act as a means of control of their membership.

    Dominionist cell churches and religious abuse

    "Iraq: the bravest 1% fighting for the richest 1%." ~ An Unknown Kossack.

    by Neon Vincent on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 07:53:22 PM PDT

  •  Pension funds and the IRS... (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Janet Strange

    I found out the hard way that when I placed money into my personal IRA and deducted the amount from my gross income that I had violated the tax laws.

    Not being a tax lawyer I naively thought that an IRA was an IRA. In a perfect world what should it matter whether I put money into my personal IRA or some 401K plan offered by the company I worked for. Ultimately the money goes to finance my retirement.

    I found out that if my company offers a retirement plan and it did that I had no choice but to put my tax deducible contribution into the company's plan if I really wanted to take a tax deduction for it. It doesn't matter if I looked at the offering and found that I wasn't interested or not. It didn't matter if I determined that I could manage my money better than the mutual funds my company offered. It didn't matter that my company offered no matching percentage. It didn't matter that more and more company offered pension funds are not there for the employees who contribute to them.

    It didn't matter because the law was written to make sure that if your company offers a retirement plan then you have no choice but to participate if you want it to be a tax deduction.

    I wonder who help write this tax law. I'd bet that the retirement fund lobbyists were in the thick of it when the final proposal was present to Congress and signed by the President. I'm also sure there was no 'signing statement' associated with this law.

  •  The IRS can't stand Amway (6+ / 0-)

    or whatever it's name is now, mainly by virtue of the company having a history of making a mockery of rules regarding tax deductions for business expenses.  (Mockery of the law - sound familiar?)

    One of its major selling points to recruit new distributors down through the years has been to tout all the business deductions to which they would be entitled as an Amway Distributor that would actually reduce their taxes while they were earning profits from the product sales.

    The company has encouraged a company culture of aggressively - to put it very kindly - interpreting the tax rules regarding business deductions, particularly regarding the age-old tax question of whether an expense is business or personal.  The deductibility question has commonly involved high-dollar deductions, including vehicles and real estate, as well as extravagent travel and entertainment deductions.  (Think golf trips to Scotland kind of entertainment.)  Company management has not excluded itself from these agressive interpretations.

    Another interesting Amway tax angle that has given the IRS fits over the years, and also speaks to how few of its distributors wind up making a profit (estimated to be in the neighborhood of one percent) from their Amway ventures, is the fact that the IRS has scores of tax cases where they denied business deductions because of taxpayers reporting their Amway losses year-after-year with no profitable years in between.

    The IRS has "hobby loss" rules that prevent taxpayers from deducting losses from a business that shows the following common characteristics: it (1) never makes any money – the most important characteristic under these rules, (2) lacks a business plan or plan to reverse losses, (3) shows poor or nonexistent recordkeeping, and/or (4) gives any other indication that the business is not being run in a businesslike manner.  The foregoing characteristics unfortunately have been found to be in abundance among Amway personnel.

    Good piece, DHinMI.

    Media Transparency also has a good article from 2005 on the GOPyramid Scheme, as well as some good links, including a downloadable book, Merchants of Deception, by one of Amway's former star distributors.

  •  Another company owned by Alticor (0+ / 0-)

    is, unfortunately, Laura Mercier Cosmetics.  I know saying this kind of thing will likely get me jeered at on this forum.  But I am a makeup-wearing woman, and they have lovely (if pricey) products; they used to be part owned by Neiman Marcus but sold out a couple of years ago to Alticor, allegedly so they would have more capital to grow the business.

    I was particularly sorry to hear about the sale, because the Laura Mercier headquarters is here in Texas (NOT New York or Los Angeles!), and after years of working in a largely male industry, I entertained hopes of getting a job with them some day.  I was picturing free products, glamorous work environment, etc.  But no way I could do it now, not if it meant I worked for Dick DeVos.  Yeccccch.

    •  There's No Reason For Anyone... (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      Freakinout daily, Carib and Ting

      ...to jeer someone because they chose to wear makeup.  I'm sure some might sniff their nose in superiority, but whatever, that's their problem, and they need to get over it.  

      Electing Democrats, making a more progressive party, building a movement, holding the press accountable, and making a better country won't be held back if women continue to wear makeup.  

      The revolution will not be televised, but we'll analyze it to death at The Next Hurrah.

      by DHinMI on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 08:29:35 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  asdf (0+ / 0-)

    A Ponzi Scheme

    A succinct, accurate description of 21st Century Republican ideology.

    --
    Gimme back my broken night
    my mirrored room, my secret life
    --Leonard Cohen, The Future

    by Tenuous Leemployed on Sun Oct 21, 2007 at 10:24:21 PM PDT

  •  privatization (3+ / 0-)

    It really cannot be repeated enough that privatization is part of a coherent, long-term plan to appropriate the wealth of the entire people/culture which produced it for the use and benefit of a few. The ideological demonization of communism/socialism/nationalization/cooperativism/welfare/social services/etc. and the ideology (and lies) of free marketes/deregulation/privatization/small government/the profit motive/etc. are essential support for this plan. In the days of Reagan and Friedman the idea was simply that by systematically degrading government services there could be created a motive for giving these functions over to private hands, in which and for whom they would be more lucrative. With time the right in all its incarnations has realized that irreversible appropriation of the national wealth is a possibility, that with a suitably degraded infrastructure all depends on corruption and cronyism, and that with a suitably misdirected citizenry (misdirected by terrorism, religion, nationalism; misdirected in the sense that though lacking access to a doctor they think they are safer because other people cannot have abortions and private armies of looters are terrorizing Iraq) the acquisition, via legal means, of permanent and unchallengeable control of the national wealth is a possibility.

    This is nothing new in the world. It is the essence of corporatist/fascistic oligarchy as has occurred constantly in history, from the kings of old to the dictators of the twentieth century. The replacement of law by power is a fundamental part of it, and such a replacement in the end can work only if supported by violence and terror (one to reinforce the other).

    •  It makes me angry (0+ / 0-)

      that we are paying Blackwater mercenaries more than we are paying U.S. soldiers, when the mercenaries are putting soldiers in danger.  Don't even get me started on Halliburton - I read a story this morning that Halliburton avoided >$100 million in taxes this year by locating their company headquarters in Dubai.   So, they get benefits from U.S. taxpayers without contributing anything back.  They are the true welfare queens.

      McCain: Less jobs, more war.

      by Unstable Isotope on Mon Oct 22, 2007 at 03:16:16 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Finally (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    vets74

    we get to the meat.
    Well done DH!

  •  MLM (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    vets74

    The MLM model sounds exactly like how the Republicans do fundraising.  The Bush "pioneers," etc.  Don't the high level donors get some perks like ambassadorships?  I also read that the Republicans give awards in a fundraising way (you give us $2500 we'll name you X of the year, plus for an extra $10,000 you can be photographed shaking Bush's hand - there was a story on this when I was in Buffalo, this happened to a local doctor).

    McCain: Less jobs, more war.

    by Unstable Isotope on Mon Oct 22, 2007 at 03:13:20 AM PDT

  •  Fundie/MLM nexus a strange phenomenon,... (0+ / 0-)

    ...now that you mention it.

    My ex is (probably still) a raging fundie, and by the time I got around to collecting what remained of my self-respect and high-tailing it out of there, she'd started in with MLM.  Actually, it was one damned think after another--trying to fill that bottomless void.

    I think there's a third thing which produces both fundamentalism and MLM: The feeling of being small and vulnerable.

    I live in Taiwan, and I get the impression that the downturn of the economy over the last 20 years has created an interest in both protestant xianity, as well as MLM.

    Isn't it a good feeling when you see the paper in the morning, it says 'Axe Slayer Kills 19' and you say, "They can't pin that one on me!" - Jean Shepherd

    by razajac on Mon Oct 22, 2007 at 04:06:20 AM PDT

  •  No Wonder there is so much rancor (0+ / 0-)

    Everything mentioned happened before Bush and after Bush.

    I was in Kosovo and Bosnia for the military. President Clinton outsourced battlefield service to Kellog, Brown and Root, General Dynamics, and Halliburton.

    President Clinton protected State Dept employees with private security firms (I worked for one).

    The government was not reinvented just because George Bush is in the white house.

    You should actually say George Bush did nothing to change the status quo.

    New label today: I am an LGFer, not sure what that is, but I am one per Dailkos readers.

    Full disclosure: I am a brainwashed killer and a troll(labeled by your readers). I am trying with the small paragraphs.

    QUICK POSITION METER
    Euthanasia = OK
    Abortion = OK
    Death penalty = OK, as long as DNA backs up evidence
    (the exoneration thing will go away with DNA).
    All Stem Cell research = OK
    National Health Care = OK, as long as everyone contributes what they can.
    Legalize marijuana = OK, and tax it like tobacco
    Iraq War was authorized by Congress (don't argue, it is fact).
    Enforce laws = OK
    Stop treating criminals like victims = OK
    Grant Amnesty for undocumented citizens = OK, as long as we then enforce the border and they pay taxes, like us.

Permalink | 85 comments