Skip to main content

Hi! I've been lurking around here for a couple of years and have really enjoyed reading many of the diaries. I've been content to lurk until today, when a bunch of somebodies finally said some things that really set me off. Hello cruel world, here I go, hope I don't step on anybody's toes.

I was reading a couple of diaries about Dennis Kucinich's badgering of the Democratic leadership and his fellow presidential candidates to act on many of the issues that progressives dearly want addressed, among them impeachment of the Veep and President, ending the illegal Iraq war (now) and reining in the extra-constitutional power-grabs of the executive branch.

What got to me was that some folks are suggesting that for the sake of party unity and taking back greater control of the government, Kucinich (and presumably others) should STFU.

This strikes me as a really bad idea for progressives despite the success that Republicans have had, in part undoubtedly due to their rigid party message discipline.  

Ever since substantial numbers of the Democrats in the House and the Senate joined in with Republicans in passing a censure resolution against, it has become increasingly apparent to me that the leadership of the party meant to send progressives a message. I think that Nancy Pelosi in a fit of hubris, summed it up best when she said, "They are advocates. We are leaders."

Pelosi probably didn't notice that she had it exactly backwards. We the people are the leaders. She and her ilk are our representatives or advocates. We elect them to do our bidding - not to tell us to shut up because they know what's best for us.  

Can you imagine the Republicans passing a censure motion against a base organization that has millions of members, donates millions of dollars and works assiduously to elect Republicans?

What on earth could make Democrats and their "leaders" take off the gloves and slap their base?  

In my view, even though I am not a supporter of Kucinich (or anybody else as yet), I think he is doing yeoman's work in pressing the agenda of progressives, demanding that the "leadership" get out of the way and let the democratic process work as well as holding fellow candidates up to a progressive standard in their policy positions.

If the "leadership" feels that progressive priorities are too controversial to pursue before a major election, should they win based on whatever lukewarm bucket of predigested, focus group tested platform fillers, they are unlikely to risk their newfound popularity on progressive causes.

If progressives stfu and allow the "leadership" to take away their rightful role then they have no right to whine when the "leaders" fail to act in their interests.

Now, before the elections is precisely the time for progressives to stand up and use all of the leverage they've got to press their causes. This is no time to stfu.

Originally posted to joe shikspack on Sat Nov 24, 2007 at 01:43 PM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences