Skip to main content

Recently, Hillary and many of her surrogates have been attacking that Obama's Hopefund leadership PAC has been collaborating with Obama's Presidential campaign to bribe people into endorsing Obama.  They also accuse Obama and his supporters denial that there is any such program as being disingenuous.  They even go so far as to claim it is illegal, despite the fact that other campaign finance officers refute them, the FEC has not seen fit to object to it.

No one has been saying that Obama doesn't have a Leadership PAC.  No one is saying that he doesn't use it to assist Democrats get elected.  Where the disagreement begins is whether he is doing it specifically to bribe other politicians into endorsing Obama over Hillary.

They often present someone's opinion, sometimes their own, sometimes it is from someone that endorses Hillary, as if it were a fact.  Apparently they feel that Daily Kos is nothing more than a blog that attempts to get Democratic Party office holders and candidates for various positions to endorse its creator, Markos, and its other FP bloggers.  Since the mission of the blog is to strengthen the Democratic Party by campaigning for, fundraising for and donating to those Democratic Party office holders and candidates for various offices.  By the logic you used above, there can be no other reason.

That might be true for some cynical members and candidates of the Democratic Party and DKos.  However, just because it is true for some, does not mean that it is true for the blog itself.  Obama has a history of being a strong supporters and campaigner for the Democratic Party.  He did this in Illinois and throughout the nation for much of his adult life.

To now cast aspersions upon Obama for his relentless drives to build the Democratic majority, sustain it and foster further growth as just a cynical ploy to become the Democratic nominee is insulting.  In 2006, while Hillary was hoarding her the cash raised for her re-election campaign for the Senate against an extremely weak Republican.  Obama was emptying his coffers and, wearing through multiple shoes, walking the beat to get Democrats elected all over the country.

Hillary decided it was more important to horde the cash to fund her future Presidential aspirations than it was to secure more seats in Washington, DC for Democrats.  Her goal, as her campaign tried to implement, was to scare all other Democrats from even trying by starting off with more money than any of the Republicans have been able to raise so far.  Only Obama was able to out raise her and would have more money raised and on hand than Hillary, if she hadn't horded that money.

You may think that shows Hillary's strategy worked.  I think it is damning evidence that Hillary cares more about her aspirations of being President than she cares about the Democratic Party and passing progressive legislation.  It shows that even though she has pulled every favor in from her entire time in Washington DC.  The only way she was able to out raise Obama was to shaft the Democratic Party, which she did with no apology or remorse.

Then when her aspirations were endangered, she again decided to chose a route that might weaken not just Obama but one that endangers many Democrats in tight and important races other than just the Presidential race.  Obama could have just rolled his PAC into his Presidential race like Hillary did.  Instead he used the funds still in it, though he hasn't fund raised for it since entering the race, to assist Democratic Candidates in close races.

Ignoring the fact that there is a vast difference between leadership PACs that nearly all of the Washington DC office holders have and corporate lobbying PACs, Hillary tried to conflate the two as being one in the same.  She did it to continue her defense of corporate lobbies and the obscene money they poor into her and other DLC candidates.  She did it in a purely Rovian attack intended to taint Obama.

It didn't matter to Hillary that such and attack would also spill over to those close races.  That other close races might not get the needed extra boosts.  Once again she put her own aspirations above the health of the Democratic Party.

She did so, on the spurious and to date unsubstantiated by anything other than her and her supporters opinions that Obama, who has been doing the same thing he has been doing ever since he exploded onto the national scene, was bribing fellow Democrats to endorse him.  Considering Hillary's past, it seems to be a very revealing glimpse into how and why she does the bare minimum of Party Building that she does.  

Other than to propagate the sham that she actually cares about getting other Democrats elected.  Hillary's purpose of assisting other Democrats is simply mercenary quid pro quo strong arming of those Democrats to support and endorse Hillary.  Vilsak's price was apparently $400,000.  Though considering the veiled threats whispered around the Democratic Party that if you don't support and endorse Hillary, you won't be welcomed by her Administration.  I don't think it was just the money for Vilsak.

UPDATE: List of Candidates for U.S. House and Senate that Hopefund donated to.

Artur G. Davis        House Alabama
Gabrielle Giffords House Arizona
Jim Costa        House California
Barbara Lee        House California
Dennis Cardoza        House California
Joe Baca        House California
Hilda Solis        House California
John Salazar        House Colorado
Mark E. Udall        Senate Colorado
Ron Klein        House Florida
David Scott        House Georgia
Sanford D Bishop, Jr. House Georgia
Bobby Lee Rush        House Illinois
Luis V Gutierrez House Illinois
Melissa Bean        House Illinois
Jesse L. Jackson, Jr. House Illinois
Danny K Davis        House Illinois
Joe Donnelly        House Indiana
Baron Hill        House Indiana
Brad Ellsworth        House Indiana
Julia Carson        House Indiana
Bruce L. Braley        House Iowa
David Loebsack        House Iowa
Leonard Boswell        House Iowa
Nancy Boyda        House Kansas
John Yarmouth        House Kentucky
Mary Landrieu       Senate  Louisiana      
Tom Allen        Senate Maine
Elijah E. Cummings House Maryland
Nicki Tsongas       House   Massachusetts  
John Conyers, Jr. House Michigan
Carl Levin        Senate Michigan
Tim Walz        House Minnesota
Keith Ellison        House Minnesota
Bennie G. Thompson House Mississippi
William Lacy Clay, Jr. House Missouri
Max Baucus        Senate Montana
Robert James Daskas House Nevada
Paul Hodes        House New Hampshire
Carol Shea-Porter House New Hampshire
Jeanne Shaheen        Senate New Hampshire
Frank Lautenberg Senate New Jersey
Mary Jo Kilroy        House Ohio
Zachary T. Space House Ohio
Andrew Rice         Senate  Oklahoma        
Patrick Murphy        House Pennsylvania
Chaka Fattah        House Pennsylvania
Chris Carney        House Pennsylvania
Jason Altmire        House Pennsylvania
Tim Johnson        Senate South Dakota
Chet Edwards        House Texas
Al Green        House Texas
Nick Lampson        House Texas
Robert C. Scott        House Virginia
Mark Warner        Senate Virginia
Eleanor Holmes Norton House Washington DC
Steven Kagen        House Wisconsin
Gwendolynne Moore House Wisconsin

Update 2:Corrected Tsongas.  Originally had listed as a Senate campaign.  She is actually running for a House seat.

Originally posted to Tempus Figits on Tue Nov 27, 2007 at 02:33 AM PST.


Is a Leadership PAC the same as a Corporate PAC

2%4 votes
11%16 votes
4%7 votes
6%9 votes
13%19 votes
4%7 votes
56%82 votes

| 144 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site