Skip to main content

Henry Hyde's death may be a metaphor of end times for the vitriolic anti-abortion movement, as indications from formerly rabid Kansas, and red-hot-competitive Iowa, open the door for aggressive assertion of progressive prevention policies. Are the candidates and Congress connecting the dots?

Did anyone else feel the energies shift this past week, the earth move a little -- if you're watching the politics around abortion closely and you didn't, here are some highlights indicating a moment of genuine opportunity for progressive prevention policies.

Congressman Henry Hyde (R-IL) died, and that doesn't create the opportunity, long off the political scene, but is an apt metaphor for the rejection of anti-abortion politics starting to take root. Famous for the Hyde Amendment banning federal funding of abortion, Hyde is a celebrated figure in anti-abortion politics. He was a decent man with a different political viewpoint than many progressives, but he was not evil. He even acknowledged his own "youthful indiscretions", in his 40's no less, when 40 was the was the new 39.5.  Why he didn't extend the same compassion and forgiveness to women, that voters extended him, defines a generation of vitriolic politics that is passing from view.

Meet the Press paid tribute playing this clip from October 4, 1998:

I think our politics has suffered not a mortal blow but a serious blow. The name calling, the negativity, the throwing of mud; the Institution of the White House, the Presidency and Congress itself; people are looking at this in horror, and we have to conduct ourselves appropriately; with some dignity and some purpose, and that's my aim. I'm not trying to stretch this out, not trying to take political advantage of it. This helps nobody. We've got to do what's best for our country and that's the bottom line.

Hyde was speaking of the House Impeachment Hearings of President Clinton, but the words seem fitting almost a decade later as many Americans are seeking a different kind of politics, rejecting the anger of Social Cons.

Word from the Kansas GOP is abortion is now a losing issue. In Kansas?  Kline, and Tiahrt, and Brownback, Oh My! Stephanie Simon of the LA Times reports:

But as the political season revs up, the executive director of the Kansas Republican Party has issued a stern warning to his fellow conservatives: Abortion is not a winning issue.  

"This is not something that the Kansas GOP is going to go out and lead on," Christian Morgan said.  Morgan said that he and his party remain firmly opposed to abortion. Most Republican voters in Kansas feel the same, he said.

But Morgan also believes that those voters are fed up with years of fruitless political and legal maneuvering aimed at driving abortion clinics out of business. They would much prefer to see an all-out focus on curbing illegal immigration or cutting taxes, he said.  

In an e-mail rebuffing an antiabortion activist who asked for more GOP support, Morgan explained: "My job is to win elections. . . . Your agenda does not fit my agenda."  

The hands-off stance frustrates Cheryl Sullenger, a leader of the antiabortion group Operation Rescue. "They're turning their back on the grass roots," she said. "All you're going to see from this is defeat."

That threat by social conservatives, to sit on their hands, was echoed by NPR's Michele Norris reporting from Iowa on Meet the Press.

Evangelicals will sit home, their ties are more to issues than to the candidates or based on the Republican label. If the nominee is someone who supports civil unions and has supported abortion rights, they will sit this one out.  

But Gov. Mike Huckabee (R-AR) now leads for the first time in Iowa, in the new Des Moines Register Poll, a kinder gentler anti-abortion candidate that is starting to rally Social Cons. Can he calm the vitriol too? His reproductive health policies are pure ideology, and continue to deny women, but even a more reasoned dialog from the anti-abortion crowd would be an improvement.  

On the Democratic side, the same poll shows Sen. Barack Obama (D-IL) holding a slight lead over Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-NY) and former Sen. John Edwards (D-NC), because of a shift in women voters. Obama now leads 31-26 percent with likely female caucus goers over Clinton.

Any candidate, cause or party that doesn't champion reproductive health will be in trouble with the vast majority of women voters. Anyone who doesn't use the opportunity to broaden the political center with support for an education and prevention agenda is missing an enormous opportunity.  

Here's how I connect these dots, I'll be eager to hear how others see it:

  • Henry Hyde's prophetic words speak to the tactics of the vitriolic politics most closely associated with Social Cons rise to power in the generation now passing. The distraction that the impeachment process became, was a lost opportunity for progressives, but it was the zeitgeist of Social Cons and their politics of personal destruction.
  • Kansas has seen moderate GOP defections, creating Democratic success. Kansas is historically a good bell-weather when predicting turning tides (against slavery 1860's; first female Senator elected in her own right 1976; and was a harbinger of the vitriol to come when Sen. Bob Dole (R-KS) used door hangers with pictures of aborted fetuses to narrowly beat an ob/gyn turned Congressman for re-election in 1974, immediately post Roe).
  • In a change election, progressives have an opportunity to hear the call from a passing generation that in its most high-minded form asks us to contemplate life, but devolved over time into mean-spirited denial of human sexuality that personalized and poisoned politics.
  • Progressives not only contemplate life, but affirm it based on reason, science, and the gift from God that women are, by winning support for common sense prevention proposals that respect human sexuality and private individual and family life decisions.  But that means Congressional Democrats stopping, not funding abstinence-only-until-marriage programs, and recognizing that the country is tuning out of vitriolic anti-abortion politics; seeking positive, rational leadership in a new direction.

 Far from being an issue progressives should shy away from, as some argued in 2004, and Rep. Dave Obey (D-WI) continues to believe, a comprehensive reproductive health agenda that respects all people and is promoted with vision, will win with women voters, independent voters, and may cause Social Con voters to sit on their hands come November.  That could be good news for progressives as moderate Republicans try to reclaim their party, and if Congressional Democrats start listening.

Originally posted to RH Reality Check on Mon Dec 03, 2007 at 09:28 AM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Maybe it was just time (4+ / 0-)

    I happened upon a dusty political button at the bottom of my drawer this morning... It said:

    no choice

    Thanks for the diary.

    You can be as free as you want, so long as Republicans control birth, death, sex and marriage. And whose vote counts.

    by ultrageek on Mon Dec 03, 2007 at 09:34:47 AM PST

  •  It seems to me that (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    irishwitch, homoaffectional

    immigration has supplanted abortion as the biggest hot-button issue of the New American Century.

    Good, on the one hand, but becoming equally divisive on the Gripping hand.

    "Never raise your hands to your kids. It leaves your groin unprotected." - Red Buttons

    by Man in the Middle on Mon Dec 03, 2007 at 09:42:05 AM PST

    •  Have you noticed (4+ / 0-)

      that all of their "hot button issues' are directed toward taking away minority rights?

      "There are no happy endings in the Bush Administration". - Randall L. Tobias

      by MadRuth on Mon Dec 03, 2007 at 10:12:05 AM PST

      [ Parent ]

      •  Aren't women slightly more than 50% ? (5+ / 0-)

        Nitpicking, yes.

        Also, if you mean taking away the rights of people who are not white and male, yes, I see that too. I seem to recall hearing that while the modern concept of the Angry White Male is... well, modern, especially due to TV exposure (O'Reilly, et al.), that archetype follows the pattern of white guys, born into privilege, and suddenly fearing that if their privileges are extended to any other group, they'll lose everything.

        Maybe part of being happy, for these people, is keeping ahead of the Joneses.

        Oh, my friend, how have we come / to trade the fiddle for the drum?

        by Shaviv on Mon Dec 03, 2007 at 10:26:38 AM PST

        [ Parent ]

        •  Politically... (3+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:
          MadRuth, Man in the Middle, Shaviv

          ... women are still a minority...  many, many women, especially in the South, are pressured to vote a certain way, or will face sanctions, the most extreme including being physically beaten by their husbands, so that undermines their ability to vote in a bloc against the most reactionary of politicans.  Not to mention that many of them have been brainwashed by the right-wing memes spewed in the areas they live in, after which they voluntarily prop up the people that want to undermine their own freedoms and rights.

          And if they're 50%, why are they only 16% in both the Senate and House, and have never been either president or vice-president or secretary of defense to date?

          It is still feasible for women to be included in the minorities whose rights are being taken away by these "hot button issues".

        •  Do we have any polling on immigration issues (1+ / 0-)
          Recommended by:

          broken out by gender?  

          I ask only because the LTE and TV/radio soundbites I have processed feature a lot of Angry White Women.   That perception is 100% reliant upon (1) the editor telling the reporter where to go for spicy comment and (2) the self-selecting of passionate LTE writers.

          I'd like to get a better demographic picture on this issue, as non-gender-oriented as it is.....

          "Never raise your hands to your kids. It leaves your groin unprotected." - Red Buttons

          by Man in the Middle on Mon Dec 03, 2007 at 01:04:39 PM PST

          [ Parent ]

  •  Turning point? SD (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    irishwitch, homoaffectional

    What probably got to a lot of people was South Dakota's barbaric "Womens' Health and Human Life Protection Act" of 2006, which defined "human life" as beginning at conception and criminalized abortion even in cases of rape or incest. The citizens of South Dakota immediately put the new law to a public referendum and tossed it. I think it was a turning point--if you can't sell "It is TOO a baby" in South Dakota, you can't sell it much of anywhere.

  •  Abortion (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Is a very difficult issue, but the dialogue is beginning to change.  I hope it continues and that we spend more on prevention and less of abortions. I just do not want the government deciding when it is legal.  

  •  "All you're going to see from this is defeat." (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    irishwitch, homoaffectional

    Good. It's about time.

    Oh, my friend, how have we come / to trade the fiddle for the drum?

    by Shaviv on Mon Dec 03, 2007 at 10:23:03 AM PST

  •  I don't see him as all that decent. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    The ONLY reason he admitted his "youthful indiscretion" (which lasted several years and happened in middle age, not youth) was because he was in line for Speaker and he was afraid Larry Flynt had something on him and acted to minimize the damage.

    As for Huckabee, a softer voice doesn't mean less opposition. The guy's a Baptist minister. He would veto any federal law guaranteeing a woman's right to abortion. He's an abstinence only guy, I believe, and if he could figure out a way to force "covenant marriage" on all 50 states (fortunately, that approach contradicts the "state's rights" so beloved of Southern pols, he'd do it in a heart beat--it would require people to undergo counseling--without health insurance, you're stuck with a clergymen--which would mean making it much harder for wives in abusive nmerraiges to get out.

    The last time we mixed religion and politics people got burned at the stake.

    by irishwitch on Mon Dec 03, 2007 at 11:10:28 AM PST

    •  Thank you! (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      I was looking for something in between "a decent man with a different political viewpoint than many progressives, but he was not evil" (that sentence making it impossible for me to recommend this diary;  I would say his participation in the impeachment of Clinton being in the final nail in that coffin) and "Calling Henry Hyde pond scum insults algae; this POS [snip] Most of us had nothing positive to say about him in life and there's no reason to look for good things to say about him in death." (making it impossible for me to recommend that comment).

      Your comment hit the nail on the head, which is why I was the first (and at this point, only) person to recommend your comment, one which, in my opinion, is the most deserving of all the ones characterizing Hyde one way or another.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site