Daily Kos

Walk Away, Sisyphus

Mon Apr 02, 2007 at 07:06:10 AM PDT

It is what Jerome a Paris recently called The Reality War.  He’s not alone in his frustration.  The progressive blogosphere says it in a million ways and places every day – that wingnuts don’t listen. Wingnuts don’t budge. They just repeat their catechism of talking points, and keep going.  No manner or amount of facts or flawless logic will lead a wingnut one centimeter closer to functioning on the basis of proven facts, or reacting according to reality.  Nope.  They live in their own world.  They stand impervious to reality, facts, and even to blowback and bitter experience by the bucketful.

And, this is frustrating, depressing, and hopeless as hell to witness and to realize.  It’s like rolling a rock uphill, only to see it land back at the bottom again, every damned time.

You may well conceive a child, and raise her to voting age confirmed in progressive and humanitarian views, faster than you can convert a True Believer to those same views.  Indeed, your newborn child has a serious head start on the adult wingnut.

This is no moot court; it’s not academic. The American experiment’s single biggest problem is that about one third of its members – historically and currently – want to restrict and restrain everyone else to their world view, their religion, their paradigms, their party, their leaders.  They are not happy with free thinkers and open societies.  They want to follow an authoritarian philosophy and authoritarian Father figure wherever he will lead them, and they want you to as well.  In fact, they insist that you do.

These are not the people who wrote the American Constitution.  These people have no respect for the American Constitution except where it agrees with them or the Old Testament.  This is a dangerous group to embrace within the American experiment.  They can seriously distort the checks and balances of government, and they regularly do.

This Immovable Third of our polling population who (still!) resolutely support Mister Bush and his ilk are widely regarded as immune to reality.  Talking them out of their praise and support for Dear Leader is beyond the labors of Hercules, beyond the labors of Sisyphus.  It is an impossible task.

The problem this presents to America is that every one of these true believers is a fully empowered citizen of the American experiment.  Their vote counts.  It will always count.

Is there a solution?  Hell, yes.  Stop rolling that rock up the hill, Sisyphus.  Walk away.

Like 90% of the political blogosphere, the gamut of daily diaries at dKOS largely consist of the reactions of progressive souls to the current crimes and depredations of the Bush Administration, and the New Oligarchy it is so eagerly building atop the American experiment.  Wait 24 hours, and you can read a fresh crop of reactions to fresh depredations.  Outrage, drama and despair rule the Recommended list!  Four letter words are in fashion!  Roaring is all the rage!  Sisyphus exerts his all!

And the next morning that rock is right back where it started from.  Reacting to wingnut crimes, deeds, and statements is a closed circle.

Stop rolling that rock up the hill, Sisyphus.  Walk away.

Let’s step back for a moment, and look at the whole American political system.

Professor Altemeyer (and John Dean) have credibly established the nature and effect of the (roughly) one third of American citizens who are Right Wing Authoritarians (RWA’s).  Simply put, they are the Bush base, a highly conservative and authoritarian subset of the electorate who are not happy when not following authority figures and an authoritarian hierarchy.  Joining and belonging and defending and following an authority figure and an authoritarian hierarchy is their personal and political identity.

It’s not just what they say and what they do.  It’s them.  It’s who they are.  They are wired that way, they swing that way.  It’s what makes them tick.  Belonging to the truth, the chosen clan, the Right Ones, is their everything.  Capice?

After Bush is gone, they will follow the next Dear Leader.  Indeed, they define their lives by whom they are with, and whom they follow, on several levels of their lives, from parent to preacher to politician to philosopher.

There is never any lack of people willing to lead these right wing authoritarians.  As Machiavelli put it, "Men are so simple and so much inclined to obey immediate needs that a deceiver will never lack victims for his deceptions."

But then, that isn’t everybody in America.

There is another third of the American electorate who are highly progressive in their outlook and actions, people who are willing to adapt and adjust their view of reality according to science and fact and their own experiences.  People who read, study, and think things through.  People who want to hear what the problems are so they can help solve them.  People who react to hard science like global warming by tackling the problem, where RWA’s react by denying it.

But then, that still isn’t everybody in America.

There is another third of the American electorate who aren’t remotely interested in politics, or in much of anything outside their daily rounds.  They have a job, they have kids to raise, they have friends and a house and car payments and their favorite sports team and all in all this is a full life for them.  They go along to get along, because getting along is what they do, and is a lot to do.  There are only 24 hours in a day, ya know?

To this Middle Third of the American electorate, politics is something that happens on TV every couple of years, and these folks reliably vote for the candidates who give good hair and good words and get good reviews from the talking heads.  These people don’t have the time or inclination to read books or blogs; when polling day arrives, they go with their gut.

They reliably vote for the candidates who make them feel comfortable, secure and in the American mainstream.  They reliably vote for the candidates who remind them that America is exceptional among nations, and that they are part of that very special something, part of that nation that is the source of all progress and enlightenment on Earth.

Gosh, life is good, ain’t it?

This is the genius of the right wing movement over the past 35 years in American politics.  They have relentlessly moved the "mainstream" American political position far, far over to the conservative point of view, and held it there by co-opting the mainstream media almost entirely.  Enough to turn that 33% of true believers into 50% of the electorate, which is close enough to steal the White House.  Which they  did in 2000, and again in 2004.

So, that’s the big picture.  That’s everybody inside the American experiment, in broad brush strokes.  You have one third on the progressive left, one third on the authoritarian right, and one third in between who generally wish to get along, feel comfortable, and know that they are solidly in the mainstream of the greatest nation on Earth.

Now, whom among this entire lot is amenable to persuasion?

Certainly not the Right Wing Authoritarians.  They do not function by logic or evidence, and so cannot be persuaded of anything they don’t already hold dear.  They function by group identity.  They do not think, they know.  They do not arrive at the truth, they belong to the truth.  Giving them the most wonderful bundle of facts and logic, neatly ordered and summarized and tied with a bow is every bit as effective as placing cucumbers in front of a koala bear.

They don’t eat such things.  They can’t eat such things.  Such things make them ill.

Can you persuade the progressive third?  Certainly not.  They are already pretty much there, or getting there by themselves.  It isn’t a matter of persuading them of new facts and new views and new solutions, it’s a matter of keeping up with them in all those pursuits.  They read, they study, they think.  They already heard you.

It is the people in the middle who can be persuaded, and swayed.  Why?  Because they don’t genuinely and deeply know or care, really, who runs the country or precisely how or why.  They are busy, and they just want to feel comfortable, and they want to know that they are special, and well within the mainstream of America the Beautiful.

If you can’t give ‘em that, what good are you?

Honestly.  That’s the big picture.  One third of the electorate can swing either way, politically, and does.  Entirely on shallow and quixotic motivations.

These people of the Great Middle are easily swayed.  These are the people who followed Reagan over the financial cliff because he had good hair and he spoke liltingly of morning in American and a shining city on a hill, and he sent the Marines to Grenada, and he was magnanimous and wise enough to trickle down upon us all.

By the facts and numbers it was all lies, and it indebted an entire generation of Americans, but it captured enough of the Great Middle to get him elected twice.  These are the people who followed Bill Clinton just as happily, because he had good hair, he spoke liltingly and made he them feel warm and fuzzy as a rule.

That’s no reason to follow a politician, or a political platform, which is what a political party is.  In Europe, people gather in small, local caucuses across their country, decide on the planks in their party’s platform, and then pick leaders who are bound to follow those planks, and not otherwise.  In America, it’s winner take all.  You only have to master what Karl Rove calls "The Math" well enough to get to 51% of the votes cast, and you have no serious operating restrictions in office thereafter, as long as you give good hair and good words, and don’t make the people in the middle feel uncomfortable or out of the mainstream.

Do that, and you’re back to your base, and soon.  Like King George is lately, since he has thoroughly embarrassed the Great Middle of America by his Iraq occupation.  He has tarnished the shining city on a hill, and lost his admirers aplenty.

What is all the political shouting on the left and right for in America?  It is to capture a great chunk of the Great Middle.  The people who can be persuaded.  Who can be, not already are.  Who can be, not whose personal identity is bound up with following authoritarian leaders and structures.

Watching the flow of diaries on dKOS go around and around, starting every day with the rock back at the bottom of the hill, with the RWA’s reciting the same talking points that were so elegantly disproved the day before -- is damned frustrating.  Watching the same process in the mainstream press, and on the TV is a thousand times more frustrating.

Stop rolling that rock up the hill, Sisyphus.  Walk away.

The juggernaut of the right wing in America is not the conservative base, not the one third who will follow an authority figure wherever he leads.  It is the Noise Machine, the Mighty Wurlitzer of the mainstream media that gives unfair audience to the catechism of the authoritarian followers, that demonizes and dismisses to the fringes any and all progressive and reality-based perspectives and platforms.

Gentle Reader, you will never in a thousand years change the catechism of the authoritarian right.  Never.  Never.  Never.

Stop rolling that rock up the hill, Sisyphus.  Walk away.

They will always be with us.  It is part of the human condition.  What the body of Professor Altemeyer’s lifetime of work proves is that one third of the human species tends to think and operate in authoritarian strictures and structures.  They are wired that way.  They will find an authoritarian hierarchy and leadership to order their lives by, and they will do it well before they are of voting age.  Moving them off that basic world view is as difficult as changing their internal identity – because it is their internal identity.

Logic is no remedy.  The only effective response to the catechism of the right wing is public ridicule.  Chase them away not by earnestly disproving their every talking point, but by laughing them off the stage.  It is a political act, not an act of logic or argumentation.  Remember that you are playing to the audience of the Great Middle, not the right wing authoritarians.  Get the audience to laugh at them, and the rock will not be there tomorrow.  Describe them as clowns, and treat them as clowns, and the Great Middle will treat them as clowns.

Let them be one third of the electorate, but let them do it on their own time, and their own dime.  Charlie Chaplin knew this simple truth about authority figures, and often said this.  The Great Dictator did more to disabuse mainstream Americans of their latent Nazi sympathies than all the earnest arguments put forth at the time in the press and in publications.

In our current times, we need to ridicule The Great Decider in the same way.  George Bush is a clown, not a leader, and this needs only to be shown for people in the Great Middle to feel highly uncomfortable with him.

It is far more effective to go after reclaiming the mainstream media from corporate control, and from the right wing catechism, than to roll rocks uphill in the mainstream media every day.  That’s just entertainment, and profits for the media corporations.  It is a closed circle.

It is far more effective to push progressive changes in who America hears on the radio and TV every day than it is to endlessly refute the statements of the right wing clowns who do get air play, day after day.  That is reactive arguing from within their frame, and that just makes the progressive positions sound shrill, which makes the middle American feel uncomfortable.

The Great Middle are not politically astute people.  These are people who  cannot hear that America is wrong.  They can only hear that America can be better.  Any other message loses them, wholesale.

There is only one couch provided in the American living room these days, and it is reserved for right wing talking heads.  Naturally, mainstream Americans who live and thrive by the television feel comfortable with this setup – it’s all that’s available.

The right wing lies; it tells big lies to the American public, and the public is not given equal access to dissenting voices, or to progressive voices.  They aren’t given the option.  Is it not better to change this setup than to refute the right wing talking points day after day on blogs they don’t even read?

The fight is not with the right wing authoritarians.  The fight is for.  The fight is for the middle ground, for the airwaves and newspapers and think tanks and bookstores.  The fight is for a great chunk of the Great Middle.

The facts of life are not at issue.  The facts can take care of themselves.  At issue is the polluted media environment in America, which only presents facts comfortable to the true believers and couch potatoes who will go along with American militarism and American exceptionalism as long as that’s all there ever is for dinner.

Stop rolling that rock up the hill, Sisyphus.  Walk away.

Go for the media, and go for the Middle.  It’s the only game in town.

Tags: George W. Bush, Democrats, Republicans, media, Karl Rove, 2008 Elections, Bush Administration, politics, global warming, corruption, Republican Party, Constitution, Daily Kos, Democratic Party, Rescued (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 29 comments

  •  How many times . . . (22+ / 0-)

    I have slain the Hydra, yet it rises up again and again.  Only when it is walled up, and covered over with stones shall it vex us no more.

    "The rule of the wise must be absolute . . . rulers ought not to be responsible to the unwise subjects." ~ Professor Leo Strauss

    by antifa on Mon Apr 02, 2007 at 07:03:51 AM PDT

    •  antifa....... (8+ / 0-)

      very well-written and cogent.  I agree, they have always been with us and always will.  We just need to focus energies to work around them.

      Thank you for this essay!

      Be kinder than necessary, for everyone you meet is fighting some kind of battle.

      by Cronesense on Mon Apr 02, 2007 at 07:22:29 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Excellent piece of logic and persuasion. (6+ / 0-)

      Thank you.

      ...tho, I'm less inclined to believe that I'm rolling that rock up the hill than to believe that I'm attempting to appeal to those who are currently of "the middle" yet ensnared in the prickly-sweet vapours of the effervescent, sparkly kool-aid served up by the Radical Right.

      My missives, posts, diaries, rants, diatribes and expositions all attempt to evoke the core foundation of righteous indignation where it intersects firmly with reality, and cause the enraptured Middle to choke up the bad medicine and breath deeply the clean air of reality.

      ...still, it helps to have your post to reference and fall back upon as a justification for calling out so passionately to our busy yet distracted and dissatisfied fellow Americans as we invite them to step toward the light of reason and into the warm embrace of reality unfiltered...

      ;)

      Never, never brave me, nor my fury tempt:
        Downy wings, but wroth they beat;
      Tempest even in reason's seat.

      by GreyHawk on Mon Apr 02, 2007 at 07:31:19 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  DAMN... that was brilliant. (4+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      antifa, casperr, SisTwo, martik

      So thank you.

      Can you think of anything the right wing will NOT do? Me neither.

      by axman on Mon Apr 02, 2007 at 08:14:34 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  I'm so glad (4+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      buckhorn okie, antifa, SisTwo, martik

      that this diary made it to the Diary Rescue list. I saw the title (and was intrigued) when you first posted, but didn't have time to read it.

      Thanks so much for this thoughtful and insightful piece. Your middle third describes a lot of people I know "out there" in America, including some of my own family members. They really don't want to know, don't care, can't deal with the issues or the politics.

      Go for the middle and the media. Yes.

      I trust Barack Obama.

      by casperr on Mon Apr 02, 2007 at 09:27:16 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Instructions... (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      buckhorn okie, antifa

      Hydra, in Greek mythology, many-headed water serpent. When one of its heads was cut off, two new ones appeared. It was killed by Hercules, who burned the neck after decapitation.

      The Concise Columbia Encyclopedia is licensed from Columbia University Press. Copyright © 1995 by Columbia University Press. All rights reserved.

      Best Diary of the Year? http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/2/23/03912/3990

      by LNK on Mon Apr 02, 2007 at 09:56:37 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  I thought the Hydra (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      antifa

      was killed by burning each stump when a head was cut off. Otherwise, two new heads would grow from the stump.

      Kind of like the two-faced liars we have running our country right now?

      "Blessed are the Peacemakers" - Jesus

      by SisTwo on Mon Apr 02, 2007 at 10:51:31 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Just possibly (6+ / 0-)

    the rare authoritarian who converts can persuade some of his authoritarian friends, but those of us outside the fold can't do it.  Also, a person might be changed by living in another country where, for example, socialized medicine actually works.

  •  Thanks Antifa (5+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    melo, antifa, SisTwo, dannyinla, Bronx59

    for this diary - but it seems that people don't want to hear or read about this. It is sad how little attention your eloquent diaries get.

    Read the European view at the European Tribune

    by fran1 on Mon Apr 02, 2007 at 08:11:44 AM PDT

  •  If politics is only going to mean (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    antifa, Simplify

    convincing/manipulating the stupid by gaining control of the media, I'm not really interested.  Sorry.

    Their number is negligible and they are stupid. -- Eisenhower

    by Pegasus on Mon Apr 02, 2007 at 08:19:06 AM PDT

  •  Beg to differ. If your numbers are not right, (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    buckhorn okie

    what happens to your argument?

    I kinda like my own pet theory: doorbelling, engagement, talking to those who DON'T agree with you.

    Like on DailyKos, every day.

    You trying to discourage us?

  •  Thank you for a thoughtful diary. (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    antifa, SisTwo, gkn

    Your analysis bears out in my own family.

    Approximately 1/3 of my family cannot be reasoned with...and I have certainly tried!  The 1/3 of my family that is too busy to pay attention loses interest quickly if I try to explain to them what is going on.  However when it is on TV (ie 60 mins) they pay attention.  

    In the case of my family the middle third could be influenced by a progressive media, whereas the wing-nut third is too busy condemning the 'unsaved' to be bothered with facts.

    -5.59-6.25 The straight talk express has 'lost its bearings'.

    by martik on Mon Apr 02, 2007 at 09:36:24 PM PDT

  •  Also necessary = geography and demography (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    buckhorn okie, antifa, SisTwo

    We should also be focused on targeting areas and groups may be effort yields the best results.

    Best Diary of the Year? http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/2/23/03912/3990

    by LNK on Mon Apr 02, 2007 at 09:58:12 PM PDT

  •  Here I am! I'm the middle (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    antifa, gkn, dannyinla

    Never was interested in politics. Have some conservative views and some progressive. Have no loyalty to any party.

    The last two presidential elections, I voted against Bush. Last year I did something that I've never knowingly done before - voted a straight Democratic ticket.

    There are more people like me every day, and more and more Republicans who are ashamed at what has happened to their party.

    I think we need to embrace people who are seeing the light. They shouldn't be berated for being fooled. It's happened to the best of us. That's why I wrote this diary.

    "Blessed are the Peacemakers" - Jesus

    by SisTwo on Mon Apr 02, 2007 at 10:03:42 PM PDT

  •  good advise (0+ / 0-)

    n/t

    If McCain is president we will be moving towards the WW IV that he has been favoring and predicting. - Zbigniew Brzezinski

    by pollwatch on Tue Apr 03, 2007 at 01:23:18 AM PDT

  •  Nice diary (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    antifa

    And you are spot on about the Right third.

    But to say things like this

    To this Middle Third of the American electorate, politics is something that happens on TV every couple of years, and these folks reliably vote for the candidates who give good hair and good words and get good reviews from the talking heads.  These people don’t have the time or inclination to read books or blogs; when polling day arrives, they go with their gut.

    seems a bit insulting, don't you think?  

    The middle third is not entirely composed of the stupid and shallow.  If you wish to sway them to your side, you might start by giving them some basic level of respect.

    •  With respect . . . (1+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      pattyp

      selling someone an exercise machine and getting them to use it is easier than getting these Middle American couch potatoes to adopt and live by progressive ideas and principles.

      It is the self absorption that must be overcome, or manipulated. They are living in the richest nation to ever exist on planet Earth, and consuming all day every day is what they do.

      The idea that they are members of a responsible electorate whose citizen role demands of them constant supervision and oversight of their elected representatives is just a yawn to them.

      And so the nation -- and entire political parties -- are hijacked to the greed and ideology and power trips of a dangerous few.

      You may respect such people. I don't have to. I will either inspire them to be real citizens, or I will manipulate their narcissism.

      "The rule of the wise must be absolute . . . rulers ought not to be responsible to the unwise subjects." ~ Professor Leo Strauss

      by antifa on Tue Apr 03, 2007 at 07:57:42 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  There are certainly unmotivated people (0+ / 0-)

        in the world, but they usually don't bother to vote anyway.  It's the independent ones who do vote that are up for grabs.

        There will always be astute people who do not cleave to one of the two choices available today.  That does not mean they have no political values.  It just means that the values presented by the two options do not appeal to them in toto.

        For example, there may be a group of semi-religious but non-fundie independent voters who lean Democratic because of the party's stance on poverty, environmental, and equity issues, but who are repelled by what they see as anti-religious rhetoric coming from within the party.  They do not peer deeper into the party because of this initial perception. (I am not saying it is necessarily an accurate perception).  

        Another example would be a group of small business owners who are repelled by the big-business nature of the Republican party, but who do not see the concerns of small business being given a fair shake within the Democratic party either.    

        Treating these potential allies with the same scorn you give to the Republican third may not be the best way to convince them to vote for your candidate.  

        •  Quite right . . . (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          samddobermann

          when it comes to communicating, the first thing to know is to whom you are speaking.

          One size does not fit all.

          But no matter where they are standing, they can manage one step to the left.

          "The rule of the wise must be absolute . . . rulers ought not to be responsible to the unwise subjects." ~ Professor Leo Strauss

          by antifa on Tue Apr 03, 2007 at 02:47:30 PM PDT

          [ Parent ]

  •  Antifa, you are so right (0+ / 0-)

    and your diary was so beautifully written that I wish more had read it - and more carefully. Amazing that people dispute the need for promoting new outlooks and language in the talking heads as this was shameful.

    It is true that we must cultivate those that, while not RWAs, follow the perceived masses in a sort of group think to avoid real thinking. There is a reason that the nacent christian-right called themselves the Moral Majority though they were no where near a majority. They wanted to create the impression which atracted more non-thinkers to their voting choices.

    Bush and McCain and their Social Security Privatization Plan.

    by samddobermann on Wed Apr 04, 2007 at 11:03:44 AM PDT

  •  & the Money (0+ / 0-)

    It's all about how money and media sway the not-really-paying-attention middle.  Equating unlimited contributions with free speech is like allowing bullhorns to be used in voice votes.  Any public proceeding provides a microphone and lets all speakers be equally loud or quiet, at their choice, without regard to wealth or status.  Public financing or resourcing of campaigns is the electoral equivalent of providing every speaker at a public meeting with access to the same microphone.

    And after the election, it’s all about how the paid lobbying business distorts politics, starting with tax treatment.  If I buy a ticket to fly to DC to talk to my congressman, it comes out of my taxed income.  If I own a corporation, I can do the same, even pay someone to do it for me, and it’s a business expense.  Heck, I can even implicitly pay someone to make campaign contributions, and so long as they also lobby on my behalf, and it’s all business expense.

    Follow the money.

    Non-concentrated media, return of the fairness doctrine, financial leveling of the campaign field, lobbying reform - issues on which the middle of the electorate can be reached, and which must be carried ... or reaching the middle on other issues will always be an up-hill struggle.  The first policy issues to address are those which make it possible to stay at the table in the next election.... Which means election reform as well –balloting that is auditable and audited, and a reduction in suppression of registration and turnout.

    Coaches used to say:
    "The will to win is not as important as the will to prepare  to win."

    •  You describe it precisely . . . (0+ / 0-)

      and it is a long road back from where we stand now to a fully representative democracy.

      This is casino politics -- no matter the play or the players, the house wins.

      I figure the electorate will sleep until they literally get dumped on their heads by economic pain. Even the widespread stirrings against the current system that are evident across the board lately may not be enough to  turn it around.

      "The rule of the wise must be absolute . . . rulers ought not to be responsible to the unwise subjects." ~ Professor Leo Strauss

      by antifa on Thu Apr 05, 2007 at 11:51:32 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

Permalink | 29 comments