Daily Kos

Welcome to the Colony of Montana ⎯Billionaires & Busted Dreams

Fri May 11, 2007 at 07:39:07 AM PDT

Mythbusting Part One:  Memoirs of a Muckraking Montana Maven
Today’s New York Times has the story of the gated community for the uber wealthy  "The Yellowstone Club" in Big Sky, Montana.  Further to the east, Montana can also "boast" eight of the ten poorest counties in the United States where the myth of an America "rich enough to give us all a farm" is coming to an end.  The great divide isn’t the Continental one that cuts through Montana. It’s the increasingly huge divide between the uber rich and the rest of us.
While in the little town of Livingston, Montana, the charitable organization "Loaves and Fishes" serves 85 meals a day to the "working poor", other residents are flying in on private jets to fly fish where they shot "The River Runs Through It."
Take a quick peak at  "A Ski Community Where There’s No Such Thing as Too Much" and then we will travel east through the colony that soon all America will be like.
http://select.nytimes.com/...

This article says it all about the scale of social inequality in Montana and the U.S.   Mega homes, mega churches and mega malls get bigger and bigger.  Mega billionaires fly in to nest on the Front Range.  In timber baron Tim Blixseth’s Yellowstone Club it’s all about scale.

Each house is built to a grand scale. Take the River Runs Through It home, a $16 million, 10,000-square-foot house now under construction, tucked into the lodgepole forest with a drop-dead view of Cedar Mountain. Connecting the guesthouse and the main house is a room with a glass ceiling, glass walls and a glass bridge, with an enclosed and heated $80,000 "river" flowing beneath it.

The home has six fireplaces and a two-sided infinity Jacuzzi. There’s an outdoor fireplace with a built-in barbecue and a waterfall. The home is covered with "live edge" lap siding, which are overlapping boards sawn from a Douglas fir tree with the bark still on the bottom edge.

Inside there is a stand-up Jacuzzi with another waterfall. And there are nine sleeper chairs in a home theater.

The Club has 4 restaurants and

Members can also visit the caviar bar, with a towering mahogany back bar, in the Warren Miller Lodge at the bottom of one of the main ski areas. There are 21 condominium units, starting at just under $6 million. Caviar starts at $120 and runs up to $350 per serving.

Meanwhile back at the ranch,actually due north and east of my ranch, there are eight of the ten poorest counties in America according to The Economist magazine in an article in 2005.  I stumbled on a blogger named John Crabtree whose site had the story.  http://cfra.blogspot.com/...
"The Poorest Part of America" on Blog for Rural America⎯John Crabtree
The article focuses on one county, Judith Gap. (Note: since the article they built a giant windfarm there and I don't know if there is any impact from that to change this particular county). And the author gets to the heart of the problem.  Like Ireland used to be before it finally built fish processing plants for its fishing industry,  Montana is still a colony.  It has virtually no food processing of its agriculture and no building of furniture for its timber and no catalytic converter business for its paladium.

There are a few signs of innovation. Montana and North Dakota are both trying to grow more organic crops, for which margins are higher, and state coffers are swelling because of the energy boom. But little effort has been made to process foods rather than just grow them. For instance, both North and South Dakota are leading producers of wheat and soyabeans. Yet according to the Bureau of Labour Statistics, the two states have less than 1% of their population employed in the food-processing industry. The crops go out by the truckload to provide jobs elsewhere.

Moreover, the cash is being distributed in an increasingly unequal way. In 2004, 405 farmers in Judith Basin County received $4m in farm subsidies. That would imply an annual hand-out of $9,900 each, but the average for the top 20 recipients was $55,850 apiece. More of the money is being grabbed by big farmers. In one way such consolidation is welcome, but it hardly squares with the egalitarian ambitions of the Homestead Acts.

Ah, yes, the myth of being upwardly mobile gets busted again.

As for the idea that rural America feeds the world, the truth is that it no longer even feeds America. Americans buy ever more of their food from more fertile and cheaper places like Brazil (though they have to pay more for it than they should, thanks to America's high tariffs). Meanwhile, providing this huge, sparsely populated area with services such as health care, schools and transport looks an increasingly expensive proposition for an ever more urban and suburban country. The years when Uncle Sam "is rich enough to give us all a farm" are drawing to an end.

Can anything be done for rural America and should we even try?  

This is from  the website The Center for Rural Affairs: http://www.cfra.org/...

The study Trampled Dreams we published in 2000 found that for all states in this region, nearly all job growth in rural, agriculturally-dependent communities during the late 1980s to late 1990s was in non-farm self-employment or small business. I think this represents the entrepreneurial character that still exists in the region, a character that remains from the days of homesteading and settlement. Yet we do virtually nothing through our public policy for this type of economic development that actually works in rural communities. An example from Nebraska, that actually has one of the best state-wide small business development policies in the nation, demonstrates this point. Last year the state spent about $500,000 for the development of small and micro- businesses; they also spent nearly $176 million in tax breaks and tax avoidances for industrial and corporate development, none of which went to the smallest rural communities in the state. That disparity is universal nationwide.

"The entrepreneurial spirit that still exists" is the key phrase here.
It does still exist in the nooks and crannies of our thin democracy.  It exists at the edge of our democracy as Francis Moore Lappe chronicles in her book "Democracy's Edge".  It exists in our hearts and in our minds' dreams. But it's getting harder and harder without real policy changes.
And before we can do that, we have got to be truthful.  That's where mythbusting and muckraking come in.  Hope stinks.  We need to cattle prod these representives to do the right things.

I know you all want to dream of open spaces that are still there for your young ones to dream about; a place filled with cattle and cowdogs; antelope and buffalo with lots of line dancing and friendly games of horseshoes.   You want to think of Montana as Big Sky country with beautiful trout streams for the guys  and cowboys with great butts leaning against the fenceposts for the gals. Speaking of the cowboy mythology, when a friend asked me where she could get a rancher like I did, I reply, "I got the last one with good teeth." Sorry, but money for dental care just isn't there for the regular rancher.  "Boy, mythbusting is not pleasant work," I thought as I looked at the disappointment on my friend's face.

I just read too much about our beautiful scenery sometimes.  It is great and I feel very privileged to be married to the last of a breed; the cattle rancher.  At the same time, it hurts me to read from a resident in Judith Gap who said, "It's hard to be happy about the beautiful scenery when you don't know whether you can afford to stretch that five dollars until the end of the week and get medicine for your sick child."  

Bill Moyers has asked us to tell the stories and in that effort to change the story of America from "the gospel of wealth" back to "The American Dream".  

Are we going to become a community again or just a bunch of people living next to each other.  I think we have one last chance to decide which side we are on.

Tags: Montana, rural America, poverty, class warfare, economics, Rescued (all tags) :: Previous Tag Versions

Permalink | 41 comments

  •  Tip Jar? Does anybody really care about poverty? (44+ / 0-)

    I'm not begrudging these rich folks, but the disparity is getting really crazy.  It just isn't right.  What kind of nation are we?  

    "It is not be cause things are difficult that we do not dare; it is because we do not dare that they are difficult." Seneca

    by MontanaMaven on Fri May 11, 2007 at 07:34:52 AM PDT

  •  It's a tragedy (10+ / 0-)

    Our economy and our society is becoming dominated by a small handful of people with unnecessary amounts of wealth, while the rest of the economy is hollowed out, the middle class destroyed, and the poor left to rot.

    At what point do we say "enough!"? When do we stand up and demand an economy and a society that is again focused on growing a middle class, on providing economic security for the working class? On providing jobs and good wages for all those who want it?

    It's issues like these that unite Montana and California, Vermont and Virginia, Kansas and Louisiana. All of us are becoming also-rans and forgotten Americans in a nation that has decided you only count if you have insane wealth.

    I'm not part of a redneck agenda - Green Day
    Neither is California High Speed Rail

    by eugene on Fri May 11, 2007 at 07:44:49 AM PDT

    •  We are all in this together or not (13+ / 0-)

      It's issues like these that unite Montana and California, Vermont and Virginia, Kansas and Louisiana. All of us are becoming also-rans and forgotten Americans in a nation that has decided you only count if you have insane wealth.

      I was so upset yesterday and today with the further news of  secret trade agreements led by Max Baucus who has no concern for most of his state that I had to write this.  It ties in with everything.  It ties in with our tainted food supply.  It ties in with our decreasing pay checks.

      It's also why I support John Edwards. Nobody is talking about this with such fervor.  He sees the big picture.
      We are all getting screwed even the uber rich.  They just don't get it yet.

      "It is not be cause things are difficult that we do not dare; it is because we do not dare that they are difficult." Seneca

      by MontanaMaven on Fri May 11, 2007 at 07:53:53 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  John Edwards talks about the economy (5+ / 0-)

        This is the reason why I also support John Edwards. No one else has made this a campaign issue as much as Edwards.

        I have seen many signs that people are being hurt by the economy, and only recently I started to hear some people saying that this is concerning them.

        One group are economist on Marketplace, the radio show in public radio. Some economists say that this is an issue that we must look into; other, the majority, are concern about income inequality because they fear it is going to cause a protectionist backlash.

      •  man I could rant myself blind (4+ / 0-)

        the diary I'm working on mentioned in the other comment ("the Montana Index" if you want to look for it in a couple days) is about just that.

        How much debt has been repeatedly re-hypothecated to fluff up numbers in the stock market?  How much hypothecated debt is fraudulently presented as "raising capital" for fake LBOs?  Then inserted into the accounting gimmickery of the GDP by those who want to seduce the lower classes into buying up debt via the stock market while the rich liquidate and relocate in Costa Rica?  

        If people only knew what was going on.

        I allege that these financial armageddon safehouses that people like Bill Gates are buying in Montana (near Gallatin Gateway) are being put up precisely because the uber-rich KNOW the entire economic souffle is going to fall flat, and they think that in Montana they're sufficiently removed from what will become the starving hordes in our cities, come the crash.  The consumer debt-financed US economy is the one remaining bubble holding up a planetwide ocean of red ink, and they are running off to the mountains to let the little guy in the crumbling urban districts hold the bag.

        You wouldn't believe the fortress we saw built in the beautiful red canyon of the Dolores River south of Grand Junction, Colorado.  For the uber-rich, of course.  Real easy to see why... come the hordes, you just block that canyon off at both ends and place your marksmen.  I mean, the uber-rich are well advised of the coming crash and they are thinking and building just that way, that they might all protect themselves from the displaced mobs once their bogus accounting practices bring the world's economy crashing down on our heads.  They KNOW what they've done and the last thing they care about is anyone but their own.

        Really.  Damn these acts of the rich.  Montana has thus become the stronghold of a bunch of runaway thieves.  I hope you diary the cr*p out of this issue.  Please.

  •  The American Dream is a seductive myth (13+ / 0-)

    because often the little guy thinks he can become like the super-wealthy.  He ends up believing that it is his fault that he didn't achieve such heights.  The truth is that the super wealthy are sustained by the work of the not wealthy.  There is a greed and ostentatiousness that make me despair for our country.  We need to value a good and decent life for everyone and create the conditions under which it can happen.  However Reagan managed to sow the seeds of discord into community building.  We are still reaping the benefits of it.  And our legislators just don't get it.  They already have the perks of power.

  •  I care about poverty. (13+ / 0-)

    I experienced some as a child.

    Thanks for this diary, MontanMaven.

    "The answer is to end our reliance on carbon-based fuels." Al Gore, 7/17/08

    by TomP on Fri May 11, 2007 at 07:57:30 AM PDT

  •  Without universal single payer, we are all one (17+ / 0-)

    illness away from poverty.  

    Without regulating our food, we are all one meal away from getting really sick.

    Without help for the real entrepreneurs in this country, we are all just a bunch of serfs.

    Living in New York City for 15 years and amongst my own kind, I could survive in an odd way all kinds of disparity.  I had friends who thought like I did.
    But here, it's really hard. While I'm doing better financially, my soul is taking a beating.  I know I must be here for a reason, but sometimes I just want to get out of Dodge.  The Republicans in donkey suits here like Max Baucus and his evil trade deals makes me puke.
    What a way to end the day last night with the bad news that Sirota brought us.

    "It is not be cause things are difficult that we do not dare; it is because we do not dare that they are difficult." Seneca

    by MontanaMaven on Fri May 11, 2007 at 08:06:00 AM PDT

  •  Everywhere (13+ / 0-)

    It's not just Montana.  In Flagstaff, Arizona, where I lived until recently, few working people could afford to buy a home because so many wealthy folks from Phoenix were buying second houses, driving housing prices through the roof.  Where I live now, in New England, it's the same thing--people buying vacation homes price working folks out of the market.

    That's the thing that free-market types don't get: letting rich people throw their money around can have negative consequences for people in the lower and middle classes.  In some of these playgrounds for the rich, property values grow so large that working farmers and ranchers can't afford their property taxes anymore.  It's a tragedy that all of this development is happening with so little forethought about what it means for the little guys.

    In times like these, you have to grow big enough to hold both the loss and the hope. - Ann Pancake

    by Scott in NAZ on Fri May 11, 2007 at 08:15:32 AM PDT

    •  All our ranches are being bought up by (10+ / 0-)

      the super rich who sometimes dress up like good intentioned folks by being "green", but at the same time want to cut off hunting and fishing access.
      It's like living back in feudal times around here.  You just hope your lord of the manor is nicer than the other one.  You hope you get Sir Robin and not evil Baron.  

      "It is not be cause things are difficult that we do not dare; it is because we do not dare that they are difficult." Seneca

      by MontanaMaven on Fri May 11, 2007 at 08:28:36 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  A lot of this economy is becoming feudal (11+ / 0-)

        A nation deeply in debt has to hope that their employers are Sir Robin and that their creditors aren't the evil Barons.

        What we seem to be witnessing is an odd and pernicious hybrid of a colonial AND a feudal system, taking root right here in the United States - a nation founded to reject both of those processes.

        I'm not part of a redneck agenda - Green Day
        Neither is California High Speed Rail

        by eugene on Fri May 11, 2007 at 08:53:34 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

        •  I have to fundamentally (1+ / 0-)

          Recommended by:
          MTgirl

          disagree.

          Feudalism was often unequal and unfair, but at the heart of the feudal order was an organic conception of society.  Indivuiduals were not atomized actors, disconnected from the greater whole.  They were socially embedded, a concept that I don't have the time to go into now.  

          Consider the clearing of the commons.  The commons was a "feudal" order, but with wealth came responsbility.  There were mutual obligations.  And then came the clearing of the Commons, the old social contract was broken for profit, and the urban proletariot was created through economic violence.  In the old "conservative" economies focused oin redistribution and reciprocation, in the new "liberal" economy the wealth were freed from social obligation.  Wealth carried no social repsonsibility.  Polanyi really nailed this.

          On a side note, I'm trying to through together a political economy reading circle with TGeraghty.  Would you be interested in joining us.  If so email the  address in my profile.  I've been meaning to email Jerome to see if he'd pimp for us.  My hope is to inject some idea to fight the neoliberal mindset into the blogosphere.  Or at least try.

          Returning to the main thing.

          I think that you are right, that the breakdown of state order into private social organization is similiar to the breakdown of Roman order that led to the Dark Ages and then Feudalism.  One would hope mankind has learned enough since that time not to repeat.  Yet hope is all to often an opiate for the masses.....

          It's not just that.  Consider the rise of private military corporations.  Beware the praetorians.....

    •  Everywhere = Santa Fe NM (4+ / 0-)

      Shops that cater to the middle class are going out of business, being replaced by more and more extremely expensive "bauble" shops catering to the second and third home set. This curve can't keep its present course without social unrest breaking out.

      Well I've been from Tucson to Tucumcari... Tehachapi to Tonopah--Lowell George/Little Feat

      by frandor55 on Fri May 11, 2007 at 08:49:20 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

    •  Same happened in Northern Virginia (3+ / 0-)

      There was so much money to be made in real estate, that the Washington Post said that about 20% of the sales in 2005 were speculative.

      The county where I live was projecting a huge population growth, and spending a lot of money into building more schools. Suddenly projects stopped, because families with children were not moving in as fast as they did before.

      Speculation always seems to hurt people who had nothing to do with it.

      •  everywhere = Maine (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        Hugo Estrada

         almost the entire beautiful rocky coast is bought up by the uber rich. We've always had the Rockerfellows (Acadia)and Bushes (Kennebunkport) and Martha Stewart and on and on it goes. Nowadays it's much worse. Even inland a lot of the huge old farms and timberland tracts are owned by the wealthy. Mainer's tend to treat the wealthy pretty good when they are lucky enough to be employed by them, house cleaners, garderners, carpenters, painter's etc but damn the contrast between the folks living in their trailers and double-wides and  ancient old crumbling farmhouses is dramatic and getting worse. Often it is the same rich families owning multiple places in the states we're talking about. Not all the rich are evil, indeed some are very supportive of environmental groups and public lands but the system that produces these vast inequalities is evil.

        music- the universal language

        by daveygodigaditch on Sat May 12, 2007 at 04:33:24 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  Automation (3+ / 0-)

    Hasn't automation replaced a lot of jobs in Montana's mining and agriculture industries?

    •  We bought a round baler 15 years ago (5+ / 0-)

      My husband can then bale hay by himself.  If it were small square bales, he would have to hire someone to help stack them. But that's part time work.  Our neighbors have big irrigation sprayers instead of hiring a guy to irrigate by hand like my husband still does. Again farmhand work.  My husband's father didn't have the expenses that my husband has or the debt.  He could hire two or three hands.  But the price of cattle until recently was not enough to break even.  The wife has to work.  Montana is the number one state in multiple jobs held by one person.

       Our mine here hires a lot of mechanics to keep the machinery going so it's not necessarily losing jobs, but different kinds of jobs other than digging with a pick. But a lot of the miners come from Canada.

      "It is not be cause things are difficult that we do not dare; it is because we do not dare that they are difficult." Seneca

      by MontanaMaven on Fri May 11, 2007 at 09:16:15 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  You irrigate too? (1+ / 0-)

        Recommended by:
        ladybug53

        No wonder you understand things.
        organized water= life.

        This is a beautiful diary. The same thing is happening in parts of California. The powers that be have done restrictive zoning to keep the private landowners from subdividing into smaller ranchettes, which drives up the prices of the existing places astronomically, so then the new owners tend to either put up a McMansion or at least a very fancy, ugly iron security fence at the front of the properties. And you never see them.  That can be good, if one's experience with neighbor's is iffy, but it's also spooky. And there's a shortage of different age groups, so it's all people in the late forties or older or much older.
        It's so wierd.
        If you look carefully in the distance from certain vantage points from our place, you can see little camper trailers where people are living because that's what they can afford. A camper. On somebody's back lot.  
        I see the homeless in the city, too. They come out at dusk and look for a place to sleep. I guess no one is supposed to notice.
        This is going to get worse before it gets better.

  •  have you ever (4+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Rebecca, badger, buckhorn okie, alizard

    blown my mind with this diary... for I have been working on one titled "the Montana Index" about the ramifications of the wealthiest people on earth clustering within the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem in ironic proximity not only to my seven generations' coffin boat Irish family throughout Montana (eg not rich), but worse for the seven Indian reservations in Montana for whom next to none of this surfeit of wealth is trickling down.  As GrannyDoc said (I think it was her):  Well, we've been trickled upon anyway...

    What's up with the recent consideration of the Montana index anyway?  Jonathon Raban's recent NYT article yielded an indignant diary to which I had to counter:

    first this:

    We know little and care less about the real lives of the rancher, farmer and copper miner, though the wet-Westers buy up inexpensive land here for weekend ranches, fly-fish the rivers, picnic in the spectacular national parks, drink in the mystique of the "Old West," as if the entire region were a giant recreational area laid on to relieve the claustrophobia of big-city types from both coasts

    then this:

    We deserve the sneer beneath the smile. They know what we want — to demolish their dams, starve their farms of water to supply our cities, reintroduce the wolf, buffalo, and grizzly to their workplaces, close their mines, enjoy their West as our nature-playground. We’re all for the "Old West" summer rodeo, but we’ll sign petitions against grazing on public lands.

    (both by Raban) and then this by the diarist:

    Mr. Raban might know little and care less about the lives of Westerners, but for those who do, the copper miners and ranchers aren't always the kinds of figures who should be idolized.

    ???

    What, no one but the major resource holders to consider here?

    As a Montanan literally driven from land due to financial burden of parental illness and the medical system, I appreciate Mr. Raban's nod to the people of Montana, although he fails to acknowledge the majority of those born there who are not "copper miners and ranchers" (note the acreage necessary for successful ranching in semi-arid regions - there is not enough resourcewise to accommodate that many individual ranches). The majority of Montana's people are not wealthy. And yes, we've too often had our livings taken out from under us by the economic tidal wave of the influx of the RULING CLASS.

    You are indeed the economic superiors to most who were born in Montana.

    Do you not know how long Montana has languished between numbers 48 and 50 out of the fifty states' economic indices, Montana vying with Mississippi for the bottom? Most Montanans are rather poor. With some of the lowest wages in the country - still.

    Like the rest of the US post-depression, most westerners didn't have much land or livestock afterward. Most worked truly dismal jobs (railroads, mining, timber lackey). And most now can't afford to stay in their home state because of the influx of the leisure class. To Montana's people, such newcomers may identify themselves as the new ruling class. Thank you Mr. Raban here for your candor. You at least recognize the difference between and urban and rural and the radical economic advantage you import with you in buying your second (or third, or...) home in Montana (Heaven please, let Rabin even read this).

    Unlike most of those who come to build their McMansions in the foothills. Fly a small craft over south central Montana, closely, and see how few canyons, ravines, now even hilltops are not absurdly crowned with log crackerboxes used by people who couldn't care less about making a living off the land. People who visit their "cabins" maybe 2-8 weeks out of the year. People who don't sit on school boards or help run the county or pay much of the taxes.

    Most of the people I know from school who are well employed in Montana are busy building log "retreats" for the economically upscale insurgents. Fine, welcome aboard, but the economic ruling class do have little concern for those who have been there for generations. "Let them run the cousin-f*ers out of the state." This I have heard. The newcomers make the laws now without concern to the economic upheaval of the ones who were there long before them.

    Typical, I know. Happens everywhere. But still worthy of "self-flagellation" which Raban has dealt himself in these comments.

  •  Maven... I love your diaries (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    OCD, AmericanRiverCanyon

    keep 'em coming.

    The NeoCOM (Corporate Owned Media) is Neocon.

    by Brahman Colorado on Fri May 11, 2007 at 08:10:59 PM PDT

  •  Yellowstone Club (6+ / 0-)

    is also a serious environmental violater.

    Tim Blixeth's Yellowstone Club was recently charged with pollution of streams, killing trout, diverting and obliterating streams, dam building, breaking down stream banks, pumping water without a permit, operating heavy earth movers in streams without permits or legal authorizations. MT Dept. of Fish, Wildlife & Parks, DEQ and the federal EPA regulators have accused Yellowstone Club associates and contractors of ignoring state stop orders and violating state and federal water quality laws. The violations stem from the construction of a golf course, roads, ski lifts and runs, and the building of more condominiums than permitted. Yellowstone Club was fined $49,625 for violating state subdivision laws.

    •  Only 49,625?!? (2+ / 0-)

      Recommended by:
      renaissance grrrl, Neon Mama

      That's a pathetic slap on the wrist.  In a just world, the State would seize the property and sell it to pay for fixing the mess Yellowstone Club made.

      If you can make people financially accountable for paying for firefighting efforts for starting wildfires, why not make people accountable for reconstruction of the environment?

      The Rapture is not an "exit strategy" and Armageddon is not a "plan". Troutfishing

      by MTgirl on Sat May 12, 2007 at 08:04:41 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  this is going to sound crass (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Neon Mama

    But I think we need some celebrity to adopt some U.S. poor kids and go on CNN demanding 18 cents a day to save some kids...
    then we need some large corporate lobby organization to declare it a 3rd world so we can have a trade agreement with the United States so corporations can outsource jobs to the United States and we can grow a middle class and increase the standard of living...
    of course we'll put in "labor standards" and "environmental standards" in those agreements for show.

  •  It's the same everywhere, including New England (3+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    MTgirl, daveygodigaditch, Neon Mama

    Here in NW CT, NYC weekenders own the landscape. House prices are off the scale, you can't get a carpenter, plumber, or house painter to work at your house, even if you could afford them. And their wealth grows exponentially. The vast majority are liberal Democrats. The same thing is happening in VT and Maine. While we give tax breaks during a war, and continue to watch the life drain out of the middle class thanks to Clinton's NAFTA adventures. Here is where the Dems blow it, essentially being the same as their Republican buddies. Without a major paradigm shift, and as long as you keep voting for millionaire candidates, we can only watch the spiral. Nader was the closest thing we had to a true champion of the middle class, but he's buried under the slime advanced by Dems who think that he caused them to lose an election (when their candidate couldn't even win his own state). You have to understand: wealthy people simply have no idea as to what it's like to have to watch the checkbook balance... something that most of us have to do at least once in a while. That fundamental difference means that we get nickled and dimed to death while their investments "work" for them.

    •  great (0+ / 0-)

      Without a major paradigm shift, and as long as you keep voting for millionaire candidates, we can only watch the spiral

      and I keep thinking the same.

      Our brainwash/ oops, I mean public school education has led us to believe that democracy solved the difficulty of aristocracy controlling the economy.  That is such a load of hooey.  Even besides the Bush family, so many of the Senate are second, third generation rulers.  They will never differ in their march as they drive the lower classes towards the abyss.

      You have to understand: wealthy people simply have no idea as to what it's like to have to watch the checkbook balance... something that most of us have to do at least once in a while.

      Right on again.  Once upon a time when I still had a studio and was a producing artist, I learned how slow the rich are to pay for work.  They just don't understand that a $100 deficit can domino and sink a person operating on a narrow margin.

  •  I came from Montana (6+ / 0-)

    I graduated high school there back in the mid-80's. A little mountain town called Libby. The scenery is incredible. I clearly remember the clean air and rivers. The wildlife everywhere. Most of all I remember how quite it was.
     Employment-wise Libby only had three things going for it at the time I was in high school. A saw mill, a mine, and the Forest Service.

     I left after I graduated and came to California. I recently went back for my class reunion. The saw mill closed down several years ago. The mine left asbestos all over the town, and Libby is now the most beautiful Superfund site in the nation.
      All that is left is the Forest Service, and that will only employ so many people. My classmates are spread all over the country. Few remain there.

    The forest precedes man, the desert follows him

    by gjohnsit on Fri May 11, 2007 at 10:03:51 PM PDT

  •  thank Max Baucus for the Yellowstone Club (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    daveygodigaditch

    It was his Gallatin I & II Land Swap earmarks (handouts) that made it happen. Literally, it was paid for by a federal handout.

  •  Gated communities ... (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    Neon Mama

    terrify me in terms of the implications for society ...

    And, they are too reminiscent, for me, of the Third World ... places like Haiti, where the rich have compounds with generators & such, with a good life, and you leave the gate and are on roads that are mainly ruts / potholes and kids with distended bellies on the side of the road ...

    Thank you for writing this ... and giving a local perspective on this story.

  •  The rot at the core (2+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    stonemason, Neon Mama

    Keep us busy enough with buying bread and we won't have time to examine why the price of bread keeps going up. Keep us mezmerized by dreams of wealth and we won't see our standard of living sinking through the floor.  My rural south Jersey county, poorest in the state, just opened a deluxe, state of the art off-track betting parlor. Enough said.

  •  Great diary, MM. n/t (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    stonemason

    The Rapture is not an "exit strategy" and Armageddon is not a "plan". Troutfishing

    by MTgirl on Sat May 12, 2007 at 08:08:39 AM PDT

  •  Leaving Montana (1+ / 0-)

    Recommended by:
    ladybug53

    Your diary made me a little sad for leaving my state.  I come from a long line of Montanans (we're talking covered wagons) born near the Canada border in Libby, graduated HS in Great Falls, college in Bozeman but when it came time to get a job and live a life, there was nowhere for me to in Montana unless I wanted to eek out a living working more than one job (jobs no child ever claims they want to be when they grow up).  There's hope that one day things will even out in Montana so it isn't either you're on the rich side of town or the very poor side of town, but I doubt it'll happen in my lifetime.  Even when I was a kid there was a broad discrepancy between the haves and the have nots.  

Permalink | 41 comments