I am sure that I will be called down on suggesting this, but I can see no other reason why Obama loses the NH primary after being up on nearly every poll.
Race likely had a reason...
Of course, many people won't want to believe this, but there is little doubt when almost all of these professional polls are wrong.
Bear in mind that a caucus - a la Iowa - is a public event. People are less likely to show race based preferences in public. In the privacy of a voting booth, where Clinton's internal polls showed her losing by 11 and Obama's internal polls up by 14, the fact that he lost by 3 in 24 hours is baffling, and nearly impossible.
I know that Hillary supporters won't want to believe this, but when was the last time the polls have been so wrong, by so much?
When race has been a factor
I am sorry to suggest this, but what is the alternative? The facts don't lie.
Am I wrong?