I have come to the conclusion that Crybama has gone too far in his starting little wars against Bill Clinton and the baby-boomers and then he starts pissing and moaning when people strike back at him.
He has set up a situation where many baby-boomers will not vote for him and that means they won't show up to work for him and they just won't vote. As a baby-boomer myself, I have never been more disgusted with a candidate as I am with Crybama. I think he is sneaky, delusional and his ego is used only to please him, not for the greater good.
more after the jump...
I think he has passed the point of no return. Yes the kids will vote for him because like him they have no sense of history but most of us boomers feel that Crybama cannot be trusted and his judgment is suspect.
In the Hillary/Howard Dean diary Obama supporters think it is great that Hillary is mad at Dean. I pointed out that the Clinton camp never wanted Dean as the head of the DNC and Dean is pissed at that. Right after Crybama went orgasmic about Reagan and dismissive of the 60s and 70s, I saw Howard Dean interviewed on TV, it might have been the morning of the Nevada caucuses and Dean said he was talking to his wife about it and she said, as if her political expertise means anything, that any candidate should be able to say what they want to say. and Crybama did...Yahoooo!
Well, one of the users on here got pissed off because I said Crybama was orgasmic over Reagan, which wasn't totally true because if you watched the interview you could clearly see that he wasn't well orgasmic but it had the same effect because that calculating, sneaky, subtle and conniving Obama was attacking Hillary through Bill. He started a war and he should have been attacked for what he did because in that interview ...well, read my response to a user on here who has lost respect for me because I used the word orgasmic.
I watched the entire Reno Gazette video at least three times and it was 49 minutes long, did you watch it at all?
Keep in mind, Obama trashed the excesses of the 60s and 70s. So that is what he thinks, there were excesses in the 60s and 70s and Reagan gave us what we were ready for, what we needed. If you have any sense of logic, you will note there was nothing said by Obama to mitigate his praise of Reagan, no caveats and no buts.
He started by saying that he (Obama) is not a singular figure for real change, Nixon was not, Clinton was not, just him and Reagan. Clinton was actually a figure of change because he took the low Reagan/Bush tax rates and raised them to 39.4%...then he lost the Congress because of that tax increase and the slow ass politics as usual of the Democrats who did not back Clinton at all on the same tax cuts they voted for.....that is why they lost both houses because they could not and would not justify their own existence, especially on TV. I am not a Bill Clinton or Hillary fan but Mr. Crybama first attacked Hillary with that statement of no ideas and "not Nixon and not Clinton" by attacking Bill. Why the hell did he have to start the war? Huh? Maybe because he has nothing to run on but pure fantasy because he has done nothing!!!
He was pathetic in his praise for Reagan and the Republicans and he trashed Clinton, the Democrats and the Democratic voters who only had excesses and then that bastard said he really doesn't care about the 60s, he is not invested in it. So, what is he invested in, the Reagan 80s or the Bush 2000?
Can't you see what Crybama is doing and has already done?? He starts the war then whines about Bill Clinton attacking him for is stupid and historically incorrect ramblings making him, this guy who has done nothing, a transitional agent of change... delusional! Bill was right, this guy is a jerk for saying those things about the 60s and 70s and who the hell wants anyone for president who would say those things about the 60s and 70s and their excesses and the really doesn't give a shit what happened back then. I tell you, I cannot stand this guy, not one bit because he is a 2 bit phony who is trying to manipulate the scene, then cry about it and have you people defend him without even thinking.
Yes, he was positive about Reagan and what Reagan gave us and negative about the 60s, the 70s, their excesses, Viet Nam meaning nothing it was just another war and it's like we didn't exist until this jerk came on the scene. He is delusional, arrogant, nasty, whining and many of us cannot stand him and will do nothing for him. So you better calculate that when you so fervently choose Obama because he has done a great deal of harm and wait till you see the emails that Rove sends out about Viet Nam, the 60s the 70s, voting for Rice because she was is black. He trashed the baby boomers and those baby boomers not on the Daily kos, and along with the Hillary supporters will not vote for Crybama. That's right and in such a hugely close electorate, you cannot nominate someone so divisive. If you want any chance to save this election, you better get smart and take another look at Edwards, who unlike Crybama is the real deal.
If you lost respect for me, I'll live with that, you've lost mine a long time ago for choosing someone with no record, no experiences, contradicting votes (I was against the war before I voted for it) and delusions that he is a f____g messiah. Crybama may well get the nomination but without so much support of those he has alienated, he will get creamed against any Republican ....creamed and then he will really be a Crybama and we will have lost our big chance. Even if you're right, Obama has already done too much damage to get back all the people he shunned.
Obama has done this election cycle a lot of damage. He lost votes that he will never get back because all the bad things he has done and said cannot be put back in the the toothpaste tube and what said cannot be mitigated by a record because he has no record. As you can see, I don't buy for one minute Crybama's explanation of the Reagan pedestal placement and the 60s and 70s attacks. He has dug a very deep hole and people are disgusted with him and have no respect for his supporters who don't see what he is. Crybama may win the nomination but he will present the American people with the most divided Democratic party they have ever scene. Ha, I wonder what he would say if some of the party elders told him that he cannot win and he and Hillary should drop out for the sake of the party and the country. I wonder what Obama would say and do even if he knew it was real and true. I know very well what he'd do. He has a Nader ego. Hillary is damaged goods now and all the is left to save this election is John Edwards. As I said in my comment, he is the real deal, very much different than the delusional Crybama who thinks the Democrats were useless punks until he came along...as if he's done something to earn that moniker "agent of change." I think we better find a way to get both Crybama and Hillary out or POTUS will be McCain, Romney or Giuliani.
Is Crybama worth that fate? I think not, even if you are a blind faith believer. The arrogance of blaming the Clintons for all the emails we get against Obama is absolutely disgusting and typical of what this guy and his minions are all about. It's more than just not liking him, many of us detest him and we think he's blown his chance, regardless of the nomination