Skip to main content

I just watched Rudy Giuliani endorse John McCain, and McCain proceeded to invoke 9/11 three times in the space of five minutes.  I guess Arnold Schwarzenegger's about to endorse in a few minutes.  And even the dregs of the conservative movement have resigned themselves to the idea of a Republican nominee they have little but contempt for ("perhaps not more liberal than Barack Obama, but certainly far less trustworthy").  Some on our side are tearing their hair out, thinking that McCain's electability outstrips our remaining candidates, and that we're resigned to failure in November.

Are you kidding?  Beating St. McCain of the Blessed Maverickiana will be DELICIOUS.  Let me count the ways.

The Tweety Effect - An Epic Repudiation Of The Media

John McCain is beloved by his little circle jerk in the Village.  It's the main reason that conservative media can't stand him, and it's why they find him untrustworthy.  A dishonest and catty group who worships access to the campaign bus and flattery and cocktail weenies, this media group will go to the mat for their man.  It's like having Chris Matthews HIMSELF running for President.  As we saw in New Hampshire, once the journalistic elite inserted themselves into the election, voters became immediately distasteful.  They can't help themselves.  They're likely to do it again.  And when they do, we have the opportunity to deny them their perfect saint in the White House, their honorable man, and watch them be despondent for months.  

Passing the Popcorn - The Conservative Crackup

Although I firmly expect the conservative movement to rally around their nominee, for some the grudges will absolutely continue.

McCain obviously doesn't have enough of a base problem to deny him the Republican nomination.  But it's extremely clear to me that, with a field that doesn't inspire anything more than a grunt, McCain's victory is very tied to perceived electability.  For a substantial portion of the Republican base, he will never be a sufficient option.  And they'll be angry.  And they're not likely to remain quiet.  They're arrogant fundamentalists who can't brook any disavowal of their opinions, and they will continue to hurl insults, stew in their own juices, or perhaps even stay home, or support a third-party candidate from the right (though I'm skeptical).  I'm all for further fracturing throughout all of 2008, particularly among the anti-immigrant section of that coalition, who are sitting by helplessly as their single issue becomes a non-factor and even the seeds of McCain's victory.

Bomb Bomb Iran - A Chance To Fully Repudiate Neoconservatism

It was no accident that Rudy Giuliani immediately ran to the side of John McCain today.  They share the same desire, bloodlust even, for more wars and a more aggressive foreign policy.  The platform is less jobs and more wars and the lizardoids in the Republican Party decided that they're on board.  McCain is completely tied to a disaster in Iraq that the country has rejected.  He hasn't met a war he didn't like.  And there's a very good reason for this.  His understanding of the economy is based on growing the defense budget to astronomical proportions to reward his rich defense contractors back in Arizona.  See, McCain is the very opposite of a "porkbuster," he's someone who uses the war machine as an economic engine.  And those are the only jobs he would create as President.

By stopping McCain head-on in November, progressives have the opportunity to completely upend conventional wisdom about the perceived Republican advantage on terror.  Neoconservatism is a disease that has gripped this nation and still drives our perception of ourselves as some kind of benevolent empire.  Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran and the sundry crises all over the world and in the war on terror are a direct result of this failed thinking.  Instead of sidestepping it, it needs to be beaten, definitively, among the American people.  And McCain's presence will mean that the election will still be fought, to some degree, over Iraq, which is a political loser for Republicans.

Beating Their Bench - Leaving Them With The Rotted Remains

Chris Bowers has more on this idea that beating McCain is better for the progressive movement in the long run.

Beating McCain is better than beating Romney: If McCain becomes the nominee, it is only because Republicans think he can win, not because they actually like him. As such, as long as we can pull it off, defeating McCain is actually preferable to defeating Romney. If we beat McCain, then not only did we beat Republicans, but we beat Republicans who sold out in order to try and beat us. Crushing a patsy placeholder like Romney is one thing, but crushing Republicans and conservatives who hated their nominee, but chose him because they thought he could win, is way, way, better. If we beat McCain, then Arnold is the only national Republican moderate left, and he can never run for President. In other words, beat McCain, and we not only beat Republicans, but we beat their entire bench.

John McCain is not at all unbeatable.  Just as John Kerry went on a favorable/unfavorable yo-yo in 2003 due to electability, the same with McCain.  What goes up can very easily come down, especially when the focus of a national campaign reveals his warmongering and his cluelessness on the economy.  And by beating him, we beat maverick-ism.  We beat the High Broderists.  We beat Bush Dogs.  We beat the neocons.  We beat the Republicans right into the ground.

I'm BEGGING for John McCain now.  And make Lieberman your VP; that'll make it even more wonderful.

Originally posted to dday on Wed Jan 30, 2008 at 04:23 PM PST.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site