Skip to main content

Illusions of Security: Global Surveillance and Democracy in the Post-9/11 World
by Maureen Webb.  San Francisco: City Lights Publishers, 2007.
306 pp.  $16.95 paper.  ISBN 978-0-87286-476-4.

Maureen Webb is Co-Chair of the International Civil Liberties Monitoring Group, a member of Lawyers’ Rights Watch Canada and a founder of the Campaign Against Mass Surveillance.  Her first book, Illusions of Security, begins with the story of Ottawa residents, and Canadian citizens, Maher and Monia Arar.  On the basis of a casual friendship between Maher and Abdullah Amalki, the brother of a coworker, Maher was renditioned from the United States, where he had been to waiting for a connecting flight to Montreal, to a Syrian prison.  He remained in the prison for a year during which he was frequently tortured.

Amalki himself had been detained while passing through Syria and placed in a prison there for 19 months.  He, too, was repeatedly tortured.  His crime was...

...having worked with a Pakistani charity, called Human Concern International, operated, in that region of the world, by Ahmed Said Khadr.  Khadr, it seems, had been a close associate of Osama Bin Laden.

While the stories of Arar and Amalki receive the most in depth treatment, there are other stories, in Illusions of Security, of terrorist investigations gone horribly wrong, other names that we may remember from some newspaper headline: Ahmad Abou El Maati,  Muayyed Nureddin, Arwad Al Boushi, Khaled El Masri.  Even these are but a small sample of the wreckage left behind by the wholesale tactics utilized to prosecute the "War on Terror".

These stories serve as the introduction to Webb’s commentary upon what she refers to as "corporate-security complex" (as opposed to the "military-industrial complex").  They give the innocent victims of the new supra-national security infrastructure a human face.  The remainder of the book documents the myriad attempts of the executive branch of the United States government to establish a world wide surveillance network through fear-mongering, economic leverage and other means.

It is not a story that begins with 9/11, according to Webb, and her point seems well taken:

In the official Washington of the 1990s, there was a general scramble, not just on the part of the neoconservatives, but also on the part of the military and security apparatus. They needed to find a new rationale that would sustain the level of military spending on which their jobs and, to some extent, the American economy had come to depend after the World War II and during the subsequent Cold War.  For this sector, the "war on terror" was heaven sent, offering them a new raison d’etre and an opportunity to acquire a long-held "wish list" of investigative and surveillance powers.

From out of this existential angst of the 90s came the infamous Neocon paper entitled "Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources for a New Century" [pdf format]which outlined a plan for the United States to remain the dominant world power in perpetuity.  Those who are not familiar with the plan need not feel insufficiently informed: it is embodied as the Bush Administration’s foreign policy from its rejection of the World Court to its invasion of Iraq.  

The Neocons kept the plan alive for years, as members of various conservative think-tanks, while waiting for the right combination of circumstances to bring them to power.  The George W. Bush presidency placed them in many of the highest appointed offices of government where they struggled to gain traction, for a time, amongst the stench of a galling peace.  The fear and anger that followed 9/11 gave them a blank check to implement their program.

There is a constant pressure from within all intelligence communities, at all times, to increase their range, resources and freedom of covert operation.  It is an intrinsic tendency of such communities that makes them natural proponents of the Neocon agenda.  There had been more than one classified project, in the various intelligence agencies’ budgets, over the years prior to 9/11, to increase one or another of the agencies’ data collection and processing capabilities both within and without the borders of the United States.  Funding came at the price of strict limitations and oversight.  U.S. intelligence could only choose to attribute its failure to prevent the attack to restrictions placed upon its desires by "outdated" interpretations of the Constitution by a Congress and Judiciary composed of clueless amateurs.

Illusions of Security is an account of the programs that have been instituted since the fateful day that Osama Bin Laden killed some three thousand American citizens and unleashed the Neocon model of the new America to redefine the legal protections for those who remain.  It is an account of similar trends among the various allies in the "War on Terror" that do not wish to be left behind as international players, and, therefore, are redefining their own citizens’ protections and participating in the creation of a huge international database intended to identify and preemptively remove potential criminals.  It is also an account of countries that America once spurned as "oppressive regimes" and that it now embraces as highly useful allies, of the subsequent repackaging of their dissident populations as "terrorists".

As the result, there is a new paradigm in town.  Or rather an old one adapted from its corporate original.  It is the paradigm of risk-benefit analysis:

In this paradigm, the criminal law and due process protections that have been developed over centuries in democratic societies — such as the presumption of innocence; habeas corpus and rights against arbitrary, indefinite detention; attorney-client privilege; public trials; the right to know the evidence against one and to respond; the right against unreasonable search and seizure; and the right to remain silent — are viewed as intolerable risks.  Judicial oversight over law enforcement agents and public officials is viewed as an intolerable risk.  Statutory privacy and data-protection rights are intolerable risks.  Constitutional guarantees, basic human rights norms, and the rule of law itself are now seen as compromising and intolerably risky.  For the risk screeners, what matters is the avoidance of risk from the point of view of the state.

We are to have as much democracy as risk-benefit analysis will support.  Opposition will be easily overwhelmed by fear-mongering tactics.

Maureen Webb struggles mightily to rally the troops in an attempt to turn back the tide.  Her opponents shield themselves with the USA Patriot Act, their weapons are an endless alphabet soup of acronyms that is constantly being expanded: ECHELON, NSEERS (National Security Entry-Exit Registration System), US-VISIT (U.S. Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology), ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization), NSL (National Security Letter), CALEA (Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act), SWIFT (Society for World Wide Interbank Financial Communications), TIA (Total Information Awareness), MATRIX (Multi-State Anti-Terrorism Information Exchange).  Keyword identification programs prowl more and more of our travel, financial and personal data, looking for signs of risk.  Soon, biometrics will be called upon to insure that there can be no escape either from the data harvesting of our lives or the unappeallable results of a computer flag.

For her part, Webb wields a solid journalistic prose style and a section of 782 endnotes comprising an index of the sources of her information many of them available on the web.  The endnotes themselves are worth the price of the book.

But will Illusions of Security succeed in raising the desired hue and cry?  Sadly, it does not seem likely. As George Monbiot points out, in his February 2006 AlterNet article "The Perpetual Surveillance Society" (cited in Webb’s endnotes):

There will be no dramatic developments. We will not step out of our homes one morning to discover that the state, or our boss, or our insurance company, knows everything about us. But, if the muted response to the ID card is anything to go by, we will gradually submit, in the name of our own protection, to the demands of the machine. And it will not then require a tyrannical new government to deprive us of our freedom. Step by voluntary step, we will have given it up already.

As governments are all too well aware, their citizens will readily accept changes quietly administered over time that would freeze their collective blood if instituted all at once.  Should fear be able to be called upon, to assist in the process periodically, the acceptable rate of change need not be all that slow.

Should resistance arise, on the other hand, Webb herself makes clear what will happen: "When programs are canceled under political pressure, governments simply reintroduce them in new packages using new names."  More often still, the program is included as part of an agreement undertaken solely by the Executive branch under the umbrella of an ongoing international treaty passed by Congress long ago and now beyond the checks and balances of our system.  These simple tactics rarely fail to achieve their ends.

All the more reason, then, to hope that Maureen Webb’s Illusions of Security finds a dedicated audience undaunted by long odds.

Originally posted to Gilbert Wesley Purdy on Sun Feb 10, 2008 at 04:02 PM PST.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Thanks (2+ / 0-)

    A well written review covering a lot of ground, appreciate the substance. I heard they proved somewhere that frogs really will jump out of a boiling pot of water...something tells me I shouldn't read too much into that as a hopeful sign for us mammals.

    I flopped trips, he rivered gutshot.

    by Trips on Sun Feb 10, 2008 at 04:28:50 PM PST

    •  Thanks Back at You (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Immigrant Punk, statistic, Trips

      The piece screamed down the blog roll.  Not much time for substance at that rate.  I'm glad it found an appreciative reader.

      I checked out your recent Putin piece.  There is a lot of good information there between your text and the links.  It's a situation that began, actually some two or three years ago when Putin announced that Russia had developed a new missile that could not be stopped by our new anti-missile-missle defences.

      •  Yeah, they tend to do that. (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        Immigrant Punk

        It's primary season and I'm guessing that's to be expected with sheer number of users. Hopefully you are able to put the review up elsewhere, where it might get a few more reads... that, or change the title to 'Edwards Endorses Obama!!!!'.

        I flopped trips, he rivered gutshot.

        by Trips on Sun Feb 10, 2008 at 05:06:02 PM PST

        [ Parent ]

  •  Thanks! (0+ / 0-)

    for a concise diary on an important topic. I just ordered my copy online, through ILWU-unionized Powell's Books, not  that other, Rethug-loving corporate online book vendor site. Of course, one might also buy it directly from City Lights.

    I wish more people understood that this is probably the real issue of our age, even with the enviromental degradation stuff as bad as it is, as it affects our ability to hold any great power accountable for its behavior-- an ability without which, of course, law is merely publicly-presentable privilege.

    I also wish more Dem leaders were as committed to rolling this stuff back. OTOH, how often does power cede its right to more power, eh?

    Again, thanks-- I might not have noticed this book, if not for this diary.

    "the people have the power to redeem the work of fools" --Patti Smith

    by Immigrant Punk on Sun Feb 10, 2008 at 05:22:21 PM PST

Click here for the mobile view of the site