Skip to main content

The temptation to write a post-mortem on the HRC candidacy grows with every day.  But apart from the arguments about dynasty, the Bill problem and Mark Penn, there is a basic truth   about all candidacies: the reflect the temperament of the candidate.  Hillary's problem may be that she is just lazy.

I am looking at Hillary Clinton the manager.  I think you can find her style showing through the problems her campaign is now experiencing.

  1.  The 50% +1 strategy.  This is a strategy of minimal effort.  Just do what is essential and not a jot more.  Why spend time, money, speeches on Red States?  The mere suggestion that there are states forever off the map to Democrats isn't leadership, its a lack of will to try something that looks hard.
  1.  The Big City strategy.  Even within the states HRC feels are solidly for the Democrats in the Fall, she seems only interested in working the urban areas.  She worked NYC to the exclusion of much of upstate NY in her Senate bid, she has been upended by Obama in the rural states and rural parts of more urbanized states.  Are there votes there not worth asking for, or is it just easier to focus on the cities.
  1.  Fund-raising.  It is much easier to work a room of well heeled habitual donors than it is to break away from the comfort of their embrace.  Rejecting the netroots, until just now, reveals in inability to embrace new ideas, to take a risk.
  1.  The Iraq Vote.  Much has been written about HRC's Iraq vote as a means of positioning her for her Presidential run.  Fareed Zakariah of Newsweek has posited that Hillary has played it safe for so long as a legislator that she may not   have the boldness to actually stand for something unpopular  as President (see #5)  She went along, because to do so would be unpopular in a time of heightened war rhetoric.  She took the easy path.
  1.  The addiction to Polls.  The tendency to do just what the polls indicate is the popular will (of the moment) is not strenuous leadership, its followership.  It means you never have to take a unique position, your positions are all focus group tested.  If your policies are drawn from polling then it suggest a lazy approach to policy making.
  1.  Finding my Voice.  Forget the oddity of a 60 year old woman with 35 years experience just last month "finding her voice".  The fact is she hasn't.  Mrs. Clinton has adopted policies, rhetoric and slogans of her competitors like an avid collector.  Her voice?  "Solutions for America"  Sounds more like a slogan from Dow Chemical.
  1.  Healthcare 1993.   When the going got tough, Hillary could not deliver the promise of healthcare.  And it never came back as an issue for the rest of the Clinton presidency. It was bruising, but instead of reaching out, communicating, using the bully pulpit.  It was too hard.  It required talking to people, persuading, instead of simply insisting it be done and expecting results.
  1.  The Coronation.  The management of her campaign has focused on a plan of assuming victory was in the bag, having local politicians carry the water locally.  Lots of money on consultants ($33 million) who are viewed, no doubt, like a human ATM machine: put in money out come results.

Others may see hubris in this pattern, or presumption, or entitlement.  I see it differently.  I see a personality that seeks the course of least resistance and has only occasionally ventured into the controversial VOLUNTARILY.  It is one reason why I believe HRC is more concerned about what Republicans think about her and the party.

Obama is winning vs. the better known Sen Clinton because you can seen the stark difference between leadership and followership.  Obama is willing to take on the hard fights because he believes results can happen.  Hillary is more daunted by the task of dealing with people and so she seeks the solution that avoids the need to get buy-in to her plans.

I invite your slings and arrows.

Originally posted to The Fonging on Thu Feb 21, 2008 at 06:25 PM PST.


A Hillary Clinton presidency would most resemble

36%47 votes
18%24 votes
2%3 votes
12%16 votes
4%6 votes
14%19 votes
6%8 votes
3%5 votes

| 128 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site