Skip to main content

The headline reads US Death Toll in Iraq reaches 4,000.  I know others have posted on this topic, and ably so, but it is a big subject and I have not posted for awhile. And I feel moved to comment.

A couple of years ago, when U.S. combat deaths reached 2,000, George Bush's press secretary said it was "only a number."  Only a number.  Well, some could, I suppose, say that the 50,000-plus U.S. soldiers who died in Vietnam is "only a number" as, indeed, is the 50-55 million deaths, combat and otherwise, of WWII. Wars are often reduced to statistics, but such statistics as these are made up of individual lives - young lives at that - ended too soon, their dreams unrealized and their families in grief. Those who  command the troops know that  this sacrifice is sometimes necessary; indeed that in order to win a war such lives must be consigned to the battlefield without regard to the numbers, because the best way to win a war is to fight with all the resolve and all the commitment necessary that the war may end soon. Those who command the troops know this paradox is the awful reality of war.

But what about those who command those who command the troops?

As a nation we are committed to the idea that civilian chiefs should command the officer corps and the troops of our vast armies. That is how it should be; that is what separates us from other nations. But that separation also sets a requirement that the civilian commanders must not only be equally cognizant of the reality of war, they must interact with the world in such a way as to prevent wars in the first place.  Yet when civilian chiefs have only their business interests to look after, or their private fantasies of empire to pursue, or their incomplete, naive and even ignorant knowledge of the world to rely upon for their decisions, then the wars of our nation can become needless wastes of not only the lives of our youth, but also a mockery of the grand ambitions of our nation's founders.

It is often remarked upon that Iraq has been a war waged against an enemy who did not attack us on 9-11; that it has been a diversion against the real enemy; a ragtag militia of irregulars hiding in Afghanistan.  That is true, but the larger truth is that Iraq is only a continuation of a series of misadventures enacted by armchair generals acting out pathetic dreams of glory and conquest. This is no less tragic for the fact that these maneuvers have been in response to those of "the other side" who also played out their global game of chess without regard for the consequences.  The great powers of the west have made the smaller nations of the world proxies in their squabbles against one another for more than a century, leaving their cities free of ruin and destruction while other peoples scrabble in the detritus of their own deferred destinies. Those who sit ensconced in their wood-paneled rooms, enjoying their Great Game, have done so too often in blissful ignorance of the pain and suffering they have caused - not only to their own soldiery, their own people, but also to the nations made they have made pawns; steadfastly ignorant of the bitterness and resentment of sovereign people whose fates have been hijacked by remote superpowers who are icily aloof from the whirlwind they have sown.

The great promise of the West is that people left to govern themselves can check the tendency of the elites in their society to enter misadventures of war. The great liberal movement of our civilization has reached far since the Enlightenment, but not yet far enough. We in the United States cannot change the world until we have changed the course of our own country and empowered political leaders with the resolve to recognize that war is not a game but a grim reality not to be taken lightly or for petty reasons. Some of us are too idealistic for this task, some too accommodating. But others see things as they really are and it is these we must seek out and make the civilian chiefs of our air, sea and land forces. It is hard, much harder than we have imagined or can imagine. Yet we owe it not only to the 4,000 cited in the article, but all those who went before.

It is hard to look at this number "4000" and not see waste - hard because it seems so evident; harder still because our great nation is responsible for it. If it is not to enter the history books as such, then that number must be an incentive to change the way we conduct ourselves in the affairs of civilization.

Originally posted to GarySeven on Mon Mar 24, 2008 at 07:11 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Thanks for being a witness to the loss, "a grim (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    ricsec7

    reality" indeed.

    Thank God the Democrats won control of the Senate... otherwise, think of how different everything would be. -G.Greenwald

    by Gorette on Mon Mar 24, 2008 at 07:20:54 AM PDT

  •  I almost didn't click on this diary (0+ / 0-)

    because I thought it might be a repeat of the one on the recommended list.  I am glad I did, though.  A suggestion -- you might want to expand your title, so that people might realize you are adding something new to the conversation.  

  •  I wanted to do a diary on why this isn't (0+ / 0-)

    headlined in huge 24 point type everywhere. Where is the outrage over these numbers?

    And the reason is as you have pointed out, really, this is business as usual.

    The apologists point out we lose 34 to 40,000 people a year in auto accidents. We lose 80 to 115,000 in iatrogenic illnesses, medical errors that in the hospital or a botched treatment protocol kill rather than cure a patient who should have lived each year.

     But there is a cynicism and a attempt to diminish and make irrelevant that number as if that is the "Only" cost of the war and the occupation. It disguises for an instant that there's a hidden cost in that the non-uniformed services and off the books security also incur casualties and some 800 to 900 of them have died and 89 journalists. (according to NYT)all totalled,  the US related numbers are actually closer to 5,000. And further by several unbiased measures between 1 and 1.1 million Iraqis have died from actual incompleted counts and valid extrapolations.(NYT, Iraqi Body Count, Lancet, John Hopkins Study on Iraqi war casualties)

     The Bush administrations demurs,and parries by claiming that only 180,000 or so due to guesswork by its Baghdad puppet government is "verifiable".

     So 186,000 people dead is not too much to pay for their ongoing war and occupation.  How much would have been "too much"?

      In war games/scenarios envisioned before the 2003 invasion, a worst case/typical casualty count was assumed to be about 10,000 US dead at the end of it.

    Judging by that criteria, Bush congratulated his generals for having a good run up to Baghdad and incurring less than 100 killed by May, 2003.

     He then triumphantly set in course the attempt to permanently occupy Iraq, and the carnage and bloodletting that flowed after without cease.

     In 2007, over 900 US soldiers plus unknown numbers of contractors have died. It is the bloodiest year for USA to date. This after the start of the "surge".
    Current numbers show the pause and cease fires are breaking down.  It also shows the occupation is being resisted in many ways and it is no way safer or more peaceful in Iraq but the opposite.

     As long as the USA occupys Iraq, has bases and military patrols to coerce and prop up a faction seen as owing its position to US armed power, foreigners, there will be no peace only increased resistance. That is a historical trend not unique to Iraq.  A people that have survived 6,000 years will not quit in 7 years or 15 years or a hundred years.

     So that is what the "trivial" according to Bush and Cheney milestone of"only" 4,000 killed mean?    

     The trivializing and discounting and even the reporting of its significance is a lie. We must resist and change this horror.

     

    Sorry. -defending- opposing bullying is not a virtue at KOS yet.

    by Pete Rock on Mon Mar 24, 2008 at 08:55:12 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site