Skip to main content

Update: I know this is the millionth diary about the debate today, but I was just compelled to write about it. I see the "complaint campaign" as important to the Democrats in the fall. Why? If we fight an issues-based campaign, it will benefit Democrats who definitely have the issues on their side. McSame will only win by distracting us with this patriotism bullshit. By creating a backlash now against frivolous debates now, we are adding a major negative to any decision by the moderators to ask such ridiculous questions in the fall.

To ABC:

I watched the Democratic debate last night and was embarrassed for ABC. I can understand sending one question to each candidate about electability issues -- Obama, how do you respond to criticism that you aren't patriotic? or Clinton, how do you respond to criticism that you are dishonest? -- but the debate really crossed the line by spending an entire hour asking each candidate repeatedly about specific, isolated and meaningless gaffes.

As a voter, and I know I'm not alone here, I care about issues like the Bear Sterns bailout, gigantic ice shelfs breaking off in the arctic, and the future of the U.N, to name a few. However, due to the overwhelming focus on meta-campaign issues, real policy issues like those mentioned above were expelled from the conversation. How is this justified?

Is it because these issues will be brought up in the general election, so we should air them now? Well here's a newsflash: bittergate, wrightgate, and bosniagate only became issues because the media, eating out of the hands of strategists from the campaigns, relentlessly reported these issues to death despite their relative irrelevance. In case one believes these issues are relevant, one can be disproven simply by looking at the poll after poll showing little movement after these heavily-reported gaffes.

So here's my proposal: instead of playing "gotcha" by mentioning some professor who sat on a charitable board with a candidate (who also happened to say some radical things in the 1960's when said candidate was a child), why don't you play "gotcha" by bringing up scholarly journal articles that challenge the candidates position on the issues? Or by more frequently mentioning statistics -- like returns from the capital gains tax -- that challenge candidate positions? Then we could see how thoughtful and articulate the candidates are, in an exciting format, without exposing the audience to the tabloid garbage that took place last night.

Originally posted to Tetris on Thu Apr 17, 2008 at 03:35 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site