Skip to main content

Never used breaking before (I don't think), but due to the tireless effort of many of our legislators (Slaughter and Kennedy not least among them), the Genetic Information NonDiscrimination Act passed today, 95-0.

This act will make it illegal for employers and insurance companies to use personal genomic information for hiring, insurance pricing or acceptance purposes. Nor will these companies be allowed to require genomic testing for employment or insurance.

This act has had a long history, passing before only to be held up for various reasons.

It passed the House on March 5, 2008 by a vote of 264 - 148. Now the Senate by 95-0.

This is a momentous day. It will not solve the health care problem this nation is facing, but it does limit one possible huge problem health care insurance faces.

People can now be able to obtain genomic information about their health in the future without worry about possible employment or insurance ramifications.

Major kudos go to several people and organizations for getting this passed.

The Genetic Alliance

The Coalition for Genetic Fairness

Rep. Louise Slaughter

Francis Collins

and many others.

Thank you!

At least we have a little good news on the health front.

Now, it's up to President Bush to sign (which he has said he would).

Originally posted to wclathe on Thu Apr 24, 2008 at 12:00 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Bush is slipping . . . (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    wclathe, mem from somerville

    He's actually signing a legislation that will actually help Americans. WTF?

  •  tip jar for nondiscrimination :D (7+ / 0-)

    It's a short one, but I think this is an important issue and it has been worked on for a decade...

    maybe this is finally going to happen!

    Daddy, Papa & Me: Two dads, a daughter & the politics of it all.

    by wclathe on Thu Apr 24, 2008 at 12:03:18 PM PDT

  •  Dr. No is defeated!! (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    Tom Coburn took his hold off after some minor tweaking to the legislation, and we will soon be safer from the secrets of our genes.  

    Elections. Have. Consequences.

  •  I hope it works but... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Cassandra Waites

    employers and insurers will still use the info to deny people whenever and wherever they can.  People who can't fight back either because they don't know that's what was used to disqualify them from employment or gaining insurance, or people who simply do not have the financial means to fight it.

    We all know there are a lot of questions it is illegal to ask a potential employee during an interview.  But years ago, while going through the hiring process at a very large company I won't name, I was asked for several personal references.  These I willingly gave, not knowing what I was letting my friends and family in for.

    To a person they called me later, upset about the "interviews" that were conducted with them.  They were called, questioned about me in depth on topics that are illegal to ask.  Questions about my religious beliefs and habits, child-bearing plans, my husband, whether they had ever seen me have even a single alcoholic drink (I reckon that glass of wine at my wedding, which all these people attended, counts?), and many more.  It was insane and absolutely against the law.

    Unfortunately my husband and I were too young, too poor and too unwilling to force our family and friends to possibly testify to pursue a case against them.  I still regret that we couldn't expose their hiring practices for what they were.

    If that company could have gained access to genetic information on potential hires, do not think for a moment they would not have done it, used it, and lied about it.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site