It's even better for Obama.
This is gonna be a short diary, but I hope it might get some recommends because I think a lot more people need to start making the point that Obama looks like an even stronger candidate right now if you count MI and FL as huge Clinton wins. Just imagine a new retroactive timeline where those two states were HUGE wins for Clinton. Doesn't that just mean that Obama had a huge swing in momentum after those two 'victories', supporting the reality that is his actual momentum?
If I'm not mistaken, even if they seat those states giving the fullest advantage to Clinton in pledged delegates possible, Obama will still end up slightly ahead at the convention and this thing will still be decided by supers. Looking at the full election narrative in this sense, how do the supers not go with the candidate with the biggest 'mo?
[This will be updated as I respond to comments, it's after you people start commenting that more details of my argument come to mind.]
My point is if her crazy Bizarro logic is right and those were meritorious victories and not sham contests, then it just means that Obama turned the race around drastically afterwards and has maintained his lead ever since.
Everyone in the world knows that the contests don't actually reflect reality, but if Clinton wants to indulge in this fantasy world then I say let's really examine what they're imagining. I say that it makes Obama look even better if what they are saying is true.