Skip to main content

Bush's comments in front of the Knesset leave me infuriated on so many levels: 1) It was untrue; 2) it was an inappropriate time, being a 60th anniversary celebration of Israel; 3) it was the wrong place; 4) It is the wrong policy; and 5) it invoked Adolf Hitler which is both outrageous and disgusting.

But I wish to focus on #4 - the wrong policy.  Or more accurately I wish to call attention to a 2003 op-ed piece from the Boston Globe that discusses the so-called Bush Doctrine

The article is written by two senior fellows at the Council on Foreign Relations, Lawrence Korb and Ben Steil, and discusses the "three-legged stool" of Bush's doctrine

The Bush Doctrine is in essence a three-legged stool, relying on the credible threat of overwhelming military force to constrain enemy behavior, acting unilaterally in the interests of avoiding external constraints, and doing so preemptively in anticipation of future enemy action.

The article discusses this primarily in terms of North Korea, but of course the doctrine applies to Iraq and is exactly the point Bush was trying to make today.

But as the op-ed piece shows, the doctrine is absolutely wrong headed. It was wrong-headed then and unfortunately I think it has proven to be wrong-headed by demonstration of this doctrine through the money-draining, blood spilling Iraqi war.

The Doctrine is untenable, as the article states. It creates an instant game of chicken.  It's great if the other guy swerves, but if he doesn't then you are screwed.  By going straight to the, "Do a I say, or else" card, you are forcing the "or else" or losing credible.  Unfortunately "or else" for Bush is either not credible (for example, N. Korea) or worse than the current state of affairs (Iraq War).

And even more importantly, leaders have a great responsibility to avoid force whenever possible.  I don't mean appeasement, I mean agreement and negotation.  It can be tricky, and it can be highly effective. Even leaders who fail in other regards have grasped the concept.  But a leader with a narrow world view and pea-brain has only the Bully's perspective on diplomacy and that is hardly the stuff of greatness.

Two quotes, about talking with N. Korea are illustrative of theauthor's  view:

Thus, the application of diplomacy as opposed to military force is not a sign of weakness, but of sanity.

and

The Bush Administration is learning the hard way that diplomacy is not merely the first refuge of scoundrels, but rather the first line of defense in a dangerous world of sovereign wills.

Unfortunately, that final quote is not accurate, because clearly Bush has learned nothing.  Every President with an ounce of competency realizes the truth of this statement.  In fact, that is the heart of being a stateman, avoid conflict while maintaining your interests.  Done effectively, this produces long-run results.  But Bush's doctrine of pre-emptive action and agreement through force as a first and last resort is untenable, ineffective and contrary to what we expect out of our real world leaders.

Originally posted to Gangster Octopus on Thu May 15, 2008 at 01:35 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site