Skip to main content

Tonight, the San Antonio Spurs and the Los Angeles Lakers continued their epic battle in game 4 of this best of 7 western conference championship.  

Home court advantage has proved important in this contest as the Lakers won the first two games in Los Angeles, while the teams have split the two games hosted in San Antonio.  

While the players compete on the court, lawyers for both teams will appear this week before the NBA rules committee which is scheduled to determine which team should receive home court advantage in the event the matchup goes to game 7.  

Under the NBA's rules, home court advantage goes to the team with the best regular season record, which in this case is Los Angeles.  However,  lawyers for San Antonio contend that relying only on the regular season record unfairly ignores the legitimate results of the NBA's 7 game preseason.  Thus, because San Antonio's preseason record (5-2) was two games better than Los Angeles' (3-4), San Antonio claims that its total regular and preseason record is better than Los Angeles - and therefore it should be given home court advantage.  

Looking at the regular season standings, we see that the Lakers had the best regular season in the western conference with 57 wins and 25 losses.  The Spurs were one game behind with a regular season record of 56 wins and 26 losses.  So when the two teams meet in the playoffs, the Lakers should receive the home court advantage, right?  Not so fast.

The Spurs claim that the home court advantage should be based on the combined regular and preseason record - in which case the Spurs would lead by a game and would have home court advantage over the Lakers.  The NBA rules committee apparently agrees this claim has some merit, because they have agreed to consider San Antonio's proposal at their upcoming meeting.  

In an interview today, a representative of the Lakers expressed his astonishment:

To change the rules of the contest retroactively because one team lost is an outrageous attack on fairness, civility and sanity. It would turn all future NBA competition into complete mayhem, as teams would vie to make any number of different factors count at any point in the season.  

In response to these claims, the Spurs general manager spoke passionately about the team's position:

I believe the NBA must count these games. They should count them exactly as they were played. The ideals of the Western Conference, and indeed basketball itself, demand no less.

I am here today because I believe that the decision our league faces is not just about the fate of these games and the outcome of this best of seven series. It is about whether we will uphold our most fundamental values as basketball players and Americans. It is about whether we will move forward, united, to win this conference and take back the NBA championship in June. That has to be the prize that we keep in mind.

Central to the Spurs' argument are concerns that the millions of fans who turned out to watch the preseason contests will be disenfrancised, and will feel cheated that the games they went to see will not have counted for anything.  

The Spurs also note that if you count the preseason results, San Antonio has more total points than the Lakers.  Although total points is not the metric used to decide home court advantage, San Antonio supporters have been advancing these statistics in support of their case.  

Originally posted to Hank Skorpio on Tue May 27, 2008 at 09:11 PM PDT.


Who will win the NBA championship this year?

22%31 votes
10%14 votes
38%53 votes
4%6 votes
23%32 votes

| 136 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site