Skip to main content

The thing I hate most about partisan politics, particularly during campaign season, is the rampant hypocrisy. Democratic candidate or Republican, doesn’t matter, all are guilty of using one standard for themselves and another for their opponent. McCain is taking a beating today for misrepresenting current troop levels in Iraq; a couple of weeks ago it was Obama getting thumped for a momentary memory lapse regarding Iran and its status as a threat to regional stability and American security. McCain confused "Sunni" and "Shiite" while Obama told us we need more Arabic translators in Afghanistan. And both McCain and Obama have given each other repeated blows to the head for what endorsing clergy have said.

You don’t even need to be on the opposite side of the aisle to earn a second standard.  HRC came under fire for claiming to have come under fire and BHO for claiming an uncle helped to liberate Auschwitz.  Barack gets lit up because Michelle comes across as critical of the United States and unpatriotic while Hillary takes a shot for Bill’s comments about Obama’s "fairy tale" opposition to the war.

It’s no wonder that we can’t all get along. The contentious and fractious state of current politics degrades us all. It’s the leading cause of the apathy and atrophy of the American body politic. Seriously, listening to what passes as dialogue between the parties is about as enjoyable as listening to two three year-olds squabble over who first touched whom. And we can’t figure out why nearly 4 in 10 eligible voters can’t be bothered to care enough to vote? Come on.

I’m not advocating self-censorship here but I am a big fan of self-restraint. How about this - for those of you on the religious right, try turning the other cheek every once in awhile? And for those on the open-minded left, try seeing the issue from the other side instead of reacting to every potential affront.

Sure it feels great to spit a bit of vitriol to relieve the frustration. And no one is above a little self-righteous indignation. Heck, I often find it therapeutic. But the sad fact is that by blindly cheering for your side while loudly shouting down the other, we only make it harder to hear.

Let’s focus on what we have in common instead of what makes us different.  Look for shared interest instead of self interest; seek a gain for all parties instead of a win for one.

The way this general election is shaping up, it really won’t matter much who wins. Okay, I know that it will matter for Iraq, the Iraqi people, and our troops deployed there, but beyond that, we’re likely to end up with same sad stalemate we have now. And another four years will pass without the will of the People being heard.

Call me a hopeful skeptic, but I’m afraid our leaders lack the courage to relinquish the news-cycle by news-cycle attack cycle. Unless and until we demonstrate our intolerance for intolerance, it will continue to be politics as usual. They need to be encouraged to take the offensive on issues of strategic importance, not the trivial BS that permeates their daily news briefings. They need to be encouraged to take the high road, even if it means – actually, particularly when it means - that they forgo an opportunity to embarrass their opponent. They need to be reminded that the fundamental difference between a politician and a statesman is civility. They need to be given an example of how to behave; we need to set that example.

Bi-partisanship v. obstructionism, collaboration v. opposition, in-this-together v. screw you, the future of American politics starts here, starts now. In the immortal words of John Lennon "You may say I’m a dreamer, but I’m not the only one. I hope someday you will join us, and the world will live as one."

Originally posted to Sanity Check on Fri May 30, 2008 at 04:30 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  See, but I see a difference in these (0+ / 0-)

    HRC came under fire for claiming to have come under fire

    because it was a lie, and she told it over and over again.

    and BHO for claiming an uncle helped to liberate Auschwitz.

    because he named the incorrect death camp, in an otherwise accurate account.

     

    Barack gets lit up because Michelle comes across as critical of the United States and unpatriotic

    which only required a bit of spin and not listening to what Michelle actually said, to believe

    while Hillary takes a shot for Bill’s comments about Obama’s "fairy tale" opposition to the war.

    because it was a lie, and should not have been said.

    I get what you're saying, but the "proof" that supports the Clinton side of this equation (in these cases) is more made up victimization.

    "2009" The end of an error

    by sheddhead on Fri May 30, 2008 at 04:41:47 PM PDT

  •  False equivalences, as you should know. n/t (0+ / 0-)

    McCain '08: because a magical money fairy will keep us from having to tax rich people! And if you believe that, I have a country to sell out from under you.

    by SciVo on Fri May 30, 2008 at 04:44:43 PM PDT

    •  I think you're missing the point... (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      katieforeman

      From 35,000 feet, all of the examples cited look pretty much the same. Seriously, step back and take a longer view - will any of these "issues" be remembered three months after the election?

      If, however, you look at it from Obama's camp, it becomes a completely differnt landscape; Barack made a small speaking error, while McCain and Clinton are both outright scoundrels. From the Clinton camp, Hillary misspoke, but Obama unfairly attacked her. From McCain's point of view, he didn't say what he meant, but Clinton and Obama are clearly dangerous.

      Try to detatch yourself from the visceral reaction that wells up inside and take a look at the big picture. You might be surprised to see what looks like a big issue under the microscope, really is not that important from a distance.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site