Skip to main content

The new batch of rumors swirling around Obama are characteristic of the attacks upon a candidate whose personal dealings and personal life are still unknown among large segments of the electorate.  I myself had to bone up on the details of his life by doing my own reading on the subject and I certainly encourage others to do so if they'd like a truly well-rounded picture of the Illinois senator.  In saying this, I wish more of the electorate would take a far more active role towards responsible citizenship; one hopes the activist example set by Obama and his passionately devoted supporters will encourage more towards similar pursuits  

My hope, also, is that the Obama campaign itself will thoroughly understand that many people will not be similarly inclined towards this degree of hyper-focus, due to time constraints, families, demanding occupations, and otherwise selfish pursuits.  

As Rachel Maddow pointed out yesterday on Race for the White House, Americans by in large are not joiners.  Historically, when threatened with high taxation, infringement upon personal liberties, and being sent to fight in foreign entanglements, we can be coaxed to collectively rouse ourselves and protest en masse, but this is not our default setting.  We'd mostly like to be left alone and left to our own pursuits.  

Our fear of a strong centralized government and the mere existence of the tenth amendment reveal how difficult it is to get Americans to think collectively rather than individualistically.  But as evidenced by high energy costs, our individualism may prove to be our undoing.  Living in a world of niche marketing and everything-to-everyone consumerism is forcing us together in ways that may make many uncomfortable.  


It is rather notable that, as has been mentioned prior, Obama's policies aren't being attacked nearly to the degree that his personal associates and supposedly close friends are.  I'm wondering what that reveals about whom.  Does Obama simply not have the kind of revealing flaws that can be easily exploited by his enemies, forcing them instead to attack even the people who are, at best, tangentially allied with him?

If so, then one wonders if these are increasingly desperate attempts to fend off what could very well be a resounding Obama victory.  Conspiracy theories aside, I wonder who or what entity broke the Reverend Wright controversy.  I am aware of who exactly broke the so-called bitter controversy, though my focus now turns to why and what allegiance this reporter is allied.  It's difficult to discern who is under whose payroll and what their precise motives are, aside from personal gain and profit.  

A few die-hard Clinton supporters are now heaping invective upon Obama, Froma Harrop being a notable example, but arguments such as hers resort to the age old tactic of splitting hairs when strongly substantive critiques would better serve readers.  Fortunately, voices like hers are in the minority.  

In the meantime, the mainstream media has eagerly showcased alarmist headlines in an effort to cater to fear and worry.  Blaring messages that are rooted in yellow journalism rather than reality, they are designed simply to create controversy where none exists.  One hopes most Americans can see past these transparent attempts.  What is perhaps the most telling about today however, is the tremendous deluge of information that constantly inundates us from all sides.  The media's  manner of coping with this new facet of American life is to often scream loud enough to be heard over the din.  The shrillest, shrewdest news often gets heard while any number of more tame facts often are submerged beneath the surface.      

Getting us to think as one voice and not a plurality of disparate voices will be a major challenge facing us in the near future and beyond.  I don't pretend to know how to accomplish this goal but I do trust in American innovation and technical advance to best guide us in that direction.  

Originally posted to cabaretic on Thu Jun 12, 2008 at 10:40 AM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site