Skip to main content

I think it's safe to say that most of us on here are liberals.  But let's face it: this ain't a representative sample of the country.  According to Rasmussen, we only make up 25% of the electorate at most...only 8% of which call themselves "very liberal" (which is half the number that consider themselves "very conservative".

To top it off, we are coming off possibly the most fringe right-wing authoritarian government in our nation's history.  The mood of the electorate is changing, but attitudes of the electorate in general make the neuronal response time of a brontosaurus look like an Intel Quad Core.  We have to face it: we were asleep at the wheel, and we lost badly.  And we are still paying for those losses.  But we have to take them in stride, and remember "Never Again".  Never again will we grow complacent and apathetic in regards to our government.  But this does not mean abandoning progress, incomplete though it may be.

Barack Obama, despite his flimsiness on the FISA issue and his more recent centrist positions (I actually agree with him on faith-based initiatives), is dealing with an electorate that has been pummeled over the last 25 years with a highly effective conservative propaganda machine, consisting of AM radio, Fox News, conservative bloggers, and the RNC itself.  And despite the resurgence of the Democratic party, the fact is that there are many even within our own party that don't consider themselves to be "liberal".  Of these people, there are many who buy into the national security scaremongering that the right-wing hate machine peddles on a daily basis.  So if you were expecting some sort of perfect Ralph Nader except with the resources of the DNC and the backing of Nancy Pelosi to come out of the South Side of Chicago and deliver us from conservativism, you had better readjust your expectations.

Barack Obama cannot get elected by focusing on purely liberal issues.  Barack Obama has to attract conservative Democrats and independents to win.  Many of these people do not understand politics the way we do.  Many of them  pay little attention to the details of the world around them.  Many don't share our values 100%.  But their viewpoints are just as important as ours in a democracy.

We have to face it.  We can't run Dennis Kucinich on a presidential ticket and expect to win.  Because right now, despite what we think would be good for them, strict adherence to liberal ideology turns people off.  You have a problem with that?  Change the attitude of the electorate.  Don't blame our politicians during campaign season.  What good is a politician that can't win?  We just have to face it: we're going to have to swallow our pride a little bit, and take our progress one step at a time.  Today it's Barack Obama.  Tomorrow (2010) it's the Democratic primaries.  And the time in between, it's influencing the rest of this nation around you.

You're not going to win people over to your side by rejecting all those who don't fit your narrow ideology, however righteous it may be.  You'd never win a significant other this way, you'd never get a business deal done this way, so why do people think this kind of approach is going to work in politics?  The fact is, over the last 20 years, we have had our asses handed to us.  WE have to turn that around.  Nor our politicians.  We have to have a strong, unified message, but we also have to tolerate some deviance from that.  FISA is disappointing, yes, but it's not the only issue out there.

I think we all know that we need tolerance and unity within our own party.  It's what separates us from the narrow, extremist agenda of the other side.  Yes, we should worry about things like civil liberties, but it would be better to worry about them after our side has been elected when they actually have the power to do something significant about them.

Just because most of this country rejects Bush doesn't mean that they are ready to embrace liberalism in its purest form.  We need to keep fighting for and defending our ideology every day, but we need to take our progress one step at a time.  Fight over who is liberal enough in the primaries -- not the general election.

Originally posted to JohnnyCougar on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 08:47 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tips & Recs (5+ / 0-)

    Tips and recs...

  •  Also, some of us are very radical (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Danjuma, StrangeAnimals

    about some issues and very conservative about others. There is no way to please 100% of the population 100% of the time. I agree with Obama's faith=based program, I disagree with his AIPAC speech. And so it goes...
    But I know one thing, I believe Obama is a man of principles and I just love the heck out of him - without apology!

    Bob Marley: Don't let them fool ya. Or even try to school ya...

    by JoanMar on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 08:54:51 PM PDT

  •  While there is no question that (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    the speed with which Obama has run back to the center after clinching the nomination several weeks ago ought to have qualified him for the US Olympic Track & Field Trials ongoing here in my home city of Eugene, that others here would be surprised surprises me, and that others would be discouraged discourages me.

    But that others are deterred does not deter me...Obama will be the most progessive president this nation has seen in decades, once elected. If others are going to purposefully drop their batons, and stop running this race, then you and I are just going to have to run this race even harder to see this man elected.

    Good diary. Well said.

  •  the price of freedom is vigilence (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    We can only influence so many people.  We will win back the White House

    But in order to make change, we need the 60 Senators

    Otherwise stalemate again and I am tired of a stalemate

    Sageman, the 60 senator guy

    by sageman on Tue Jul 01, 2008 at 08:56:37 PM PDT

  •  That's a recipie for defeat. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    We only get to shift the Overton window if we're actively pushing things.

    I'm also sick of people pretending that liberalism is something we have to be ashamed or embarrassed of, and try to hide from the light of day. The majority of our fellow citizens are good people, who don't want to commit torture, spy on the populace, despoil the environment, or create massive inequality. If you give them a genuinely liberal alternative, they will take it.

    •  Who said we should be ashamed? (2+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Kiamichi, StrangeAnimals

      I said we should keep fighting and be proud.  But we can't let our own desire for an ideological perfection backfire.

      Of course, most people support liberal positions but don't even know it.  But most people are also prone to scaremongering tactics and wedge issues.  Obama's simply trying to inoculate himself from some of the pending attacks.

      •  Which is a BAD idea. (0+ / 0-)

        Because they will attack him anyway. Doing this sort of "innoculation" is worse than wrong on the merits-- it looks weak and reinforces right-wing memes that liberals are out of touch with the rest of the country. You're buying into their framing from the outset-- and if you do that, you've already lost.

  •  EXCELLENT DIARY!! (0+ / 0-)

    I'm one of those people the diarist referred to. I'm a registered Independent who more often than not votes Democrat, although I voted John Anderson for POTUS in 1980 and Jesse Ventura for Minnesota governor back in the 90s, both Independents. I am liberal on some issues and right wing on others.  On balance, I'm a centrist.  I'm drawn to Obama's mostly liberal but sensibly moderate (lately) position on some issues.  I AGREE with his practical position on FISA, although I think he'll get after the telecoms after he gets into office.  I AGREE with his position on the 2nd Amendment.  I AGREE with his faith-based initiative.  I AGREE with his position on the death-penalty for child rapists.  I agree with his preference that Affirmative Action should be class/economic based not race based, in other words poor whites should be included and upper class minorities (like his own daughters) excluded.  I like this guy!

    I'm voting for this guy!  As much as I loath the Bush Administration and his puppert McSame, I could never vote for Ralph Nadar or Dennis Kucinich.

    Go Obama!  Keep tacking to the center and win this thing! Keep being smart with your campaign.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site