Oh, apparently the wingnutosphere is in a tizzy because the traditional media won't cover the latest tripe from the National Enquirer. On that front, Richard Blair makes a good point:
if the legacy media heathers decide that they must titter and squeal about the veracity of the claims of in the Enquirer, then they are also duty bound to get to the bottom of the following tabloid stories:
Bush Booze Crisis, National Enquirer, 2/21/2005
Claw Marks, Globe Magazine, 1/8/2008:
Google Bush divorce tabloid and see what you come up with (hint: more than 175,000 hits)
Yeah! Why won't the "MSM" cover these stories? Coverup!
Seriously, I can't believe this is even subject to debate, but for the crazies, no source is too disreputable if it validates their warped world view. Although in a perverse sense, the more energy they spend on b.s. like this (and Obama's supposedly forged birth certificate), the less energy they're spending on smearing Obama.