Skip to main content

Reagan made Carter into a laughingstock, and now McCain's primed to become a similar target of ridicule.

What's the most important gift we can receive from the GOP? Learning to tap into the psyche of America, its pathos and humor and frustration. Who understood this better than any? Reagan.

Let's be honest: Reagan was an idiot who spent a significant portion of his presidency intellectually incapacitated from Alzheimer's disease. But in 1980, he squared away with a genius, incumbent President Carter and resoundingly cleaned his clock. The lessons of Reagan solidified what should have been a tenuous 32 year political realignment into a 40 year one.

Only a political wunderkind like Reagan could have created the generational coattails for a doofus like Bush I, John Sununu (current NH Senator about to face karma) and Bush's moron child.

Reagan should not have won 1980. He was risky. He was "different".  Exchewing the politer tone of the WASP politicians (and to a lesser extent the Kennedies) before them, he pulled out the mockery endemic to Scotch-Irish working grunts from Pennsylvania and Missouri (home of Limbaugh) to Idaho, he found political gold. He spoke directly, fiercely stubborn.

When Carter rightly criticized one of Reagan's many idiotic schemes, Reagan turned the tables on Carter with four words: "There you go again". Thenceforth the upside for the elections changed. Landslide. Carter was forever doomed to be a laughingstock.

So it actually warms my heart to see that Obama, raised in Reagan America, knows how to stand his ground in the modern political consensus. On McCain's big phony cries about the very Washington that he cannot seperate from himself, Obama used direct, aggressive language:

McCain's campaign "ran an ad saying Washington is broken. No kidding. It took him 26 years to figure it out," Obama said.

That's hilarious. Hello. Senator? You've found your groove! Do this again and again.

There was this exhilarating moment back in Indiana during the primary campaign. The Terre Haute speech in response to "bittergate". I've yet to see something like it since.

I think Obama's campaign has backed off this style because it's too angry/negative. I disagree, as have a lot of political analysts.  "Things suck" is a powerful message to hammer away with, although there is a fine line between having it ruin the image of Obama as a positive figure. I'd err on this side. Anyway, here's where he gets good:

[Setup]Here's what's rich. Sen. Clinton says, 'well I don't think people are bitter in Pennsylvania. You know, I think Barack's being condescending.'

John McCain says, 'oh, how can he say that? How can he say that people are bitter. You know, he obviously is out of touch with people.'

Out of Touch? Out of touch? I mean, John McCain, it took him three tries to finally figure out the home foreclosure criss was a problem, and he says I'm out of touch?

Senator Clinton voted for a credit card-sponsered bankruptcy bill, that made it harder for people to get out of debt, after taking money from the financial services companies. And she says I'm out of touch?

No, I'm in touch. I know exactly what's going on. I know what's goign on in Pennsylvania, I know what's going on in Indiana. I know what's going on in Illinois. People are fed up. They're angry and they're frustrated and they're bitter and they want to see a change in Washington. And that's why I'm running for President of the United States of America. [soaring applause]"

Obama took the bitter controversy on, in about as red-hostile territory as it comes... and in a few paragraphs turned it on its head. He used the same type of hilarious mockery in the 26 years joke, but he also took the anger of people and tapped into it.

I just argued in my last diary that the American people are a "bull in a China shop". We are the ones who most naturally can tame that bull. I'd err on the side of assuming we're bitter over McCain's bullshit, nouveau-riche, self-help, rightwing porno vision of America.

But mainly, Obama camp: Make fun of McCain! Don't hit below the belt. Corruption, btw, isn't below the belt. His privilege, his wealth, his ideology but mainly his ego are all great targets! Prompting laughter is actually seductive.

By the way, McCain is a charismatic black hole. Did you read his joke at Sturgis?

"My opponent doesn't want to drill, he doesn't want nuclear power, he wants you to inflate your tires."

Har! Ho! Um... yeah. Obama's got teh funnier award.

I remember back to ye olden days when the (significantly less) Obama supporters (myself and poblano were some of the earliest, then icebergslim started doing her weekly diaries)had to deal with all the grief and idiocy caused by Obama calling Reagan a "transformational" figure.

All the fighting over the use of tone and the description has already been hashed, re-hashed and served with a Burger King breakfast meal.  Paul Rosenberg correctly stated that, "Reagan was a figurehead, a rallying point for the conservative movement that has taken over many of the elite institutions of America, but it has not changed the heart of America". Reagan came as the apex of a rightwing political realignment, (Nixon to Bush II) its telegenic Golden Age. As was JFK, (also a comparatively mediocre president) placed between the transformative presidencies of New Dealer FDR and the failing Great Society visionary LBJ.

But Obama learned enough from what made Reagan likeable, and that's the most important lesson the GOP can give us. (You learn from your enemies. Don't be proud.)

Obama has the chance to be the usher of a new political age. He can deflate McCain's puffed up privilege and stature. Do it without being callous to McCain's age or Cindy, a sure backfire. But mock him.

Originally posted to Nulwee on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 08:27 AM PDT.


Who's funnier?

9%5 votes
90%47 votes

| 52 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Tip Jar (10+ / 0-)

    I know you wish all this non-substantive charisma deficit politics weren't in play, but Burgess Meredith has some advice for you:

    Plus, he knows what crapped out means, which will help him explain his condition on the morning of November 5 - PBCliberal

    by Nulwee on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 08:31:33 AM PDT

  •  I definitely think humor is a highly effective (6+ / 0-)

    agitational device.

    "George W. Bush ... has shown phenomenal restraint while being constantly attacked by people not fit to hold his coat... " --- From a RW website.

    by Kimball Cross on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 08:34:27 AM PDT

    •  I remember what the Repubs used to do during the (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      Kimball Cross

      protests in 2004. They would hold french fries or flip flops out the car window.

      Out of all the possible responses they could have given, their least nasty one was the funniest and most effective.

      Plus, he knows what crapped out means, which will help him explain his condition on the morning of November 5 - PBCliberal

      by Nulwee on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 08:44:05 AM PDT

      [ Parent ]

  •  Ouch (4+ / 0-)

    "It took him 26 years to figure that out."

    Damn. Way to slice up McCain's "experience" argument and make him seem slow-on-the-uptake at the same time.

    What do vegetarian zombies eat? Graaaaaaaaaaiiinnns.

    by droogie6655321 on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 08:35:42 AM PDT

  •  Reagan's other debate line against Mondale (4+ / 0-)

    about "not making an issue of his opponent's youth and inexperience" also won over the rabble. I strongly suspect someone wrote that one for him in the event that Mondale dared go there w/regards to Reagan's age.

    Let's hope Obama can get in a similar zinger in the debate 'cause it sure seems to work.

    This ain't no party. This ain't no disco. This ain't no foolin' around!

    by Snud on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 08:35:48 AM PDT

  •  McCain is obviously funnier. (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    C'mon, I can't get enough of his shenanigans! I can't stop laughing when I think of his Chelsea Clinton joke. And who could forget his hit single "Bomb Iran". Most importantly, he's like a mix between Bob Dole and Dick Cheney.

    Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran!

    by Kip the Dip on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 08:46:13 AM PDT

  •  what's weird is... (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    McCain actually can be very funny.  He does have a good sense of humor.  Go back and watch some old Daily Show appearances... some of the things he said were a riot.  I mean, when Zell Miller pitched his fit at the Republican convention and McCain went on the Daily Show and said, "Wow, I think Kerry must have shot Zell's dog or something!", that was way-funny.

    But somehow it's left him during this campaign.  I guess he's being careful about what he's saying or something, to avoid controversy, but he has no gift for funny anymore... it's been turned into an amplification of "lame."  (Saying "my friends" over and over, god, that's weak).  

    Obama's out-funnying him about 10-to-1, and Obama's supposed to be the "stiff, elitist" guy...

    "Those who dance appear insane to those who can't hear the music." - George Carlin (R.I.P.)

    by shadetree mortician on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 08:59:12 AM PDT

  •  His base thinks he's losing his marbles (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    I work with a lot of his base and they all think he is forgetful grandpa.  They are NOT enthused about their candidate and all say they don't have a chance in hell of winning.

    When your own guys think you are a joke and have no confidence in you.... you're in trouble.

    "Dear Mr. President, there are too many states nowadays. Please eliminate three. I am not a crackpot." - Grandpa Simpson

    by ourhispanicvoices on Thu Aug 07, 2008 at 09:13:44 AM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site