Skip to main content

Yesterday, Talking Points Memo posted an item about the Obama campaign's new strategy of portraying McCain as a reckless hothead.

Today, McCain gave Obama the gift of the summer by forgetting how many houses he has. The Obama campaign, quite reasonably, has pounced: as Kagro X reported, they are throwing together events in 16 different states in order to call attention to McCain's own personal "housing crisis."

So... if the Obama campaign is pushing the "out of touch plutocrat" line of attack, does that mean they need to drop the hothead strategy?  Are the messages and images of the two lines of attack working at cross-purposes? Do they cancel each other out?

See below the jump for the answer! (hint: "No")

No, I don't think so-- and that's why I like the hothead strategy so damn much.

A long-term strategy framing McCain as a reckless, hair-trigger pol can complement almost any other attack, and not just on the subject of foreign policy, either: Take energy. One might point out that McCain rashly jumps to solutions that every expert knows won't work (gas tax holiday! "Drill here! drill now!"), and lashes out at anyone who calls him on the carpet. And you can always show angry-confused-hothead McCain yelling, "Anyone else as sick as I am of paying four dollars, uh bucks a d--uhhh Paying four gallons!").

More importantly, the hothead strategy allows Obama to answer McCain's jabs without seeming reactive. Today (and for a while ahead, I presume and hope), Obama is flogging McCain's riches.  What does the McCain campaign do?  As usual, they answer with a flailing rejoinder filled with cheap ad hominem attacks and threats of further mudslinging.  To paraphrase:

Unlike Obama, John McCain isn't "an arugula-eating, pointy headed professor type." Oh, and, if you haven't heard, McCain was totally a POW.  That stands for "prisoner of war."
We have chosen to interpret Obama's attack as a signal that anything goes, so we're going to open up the flood gates and start hitting Barry with the really nasty stuff now: The holy wingnut trinity of Ayers, Wright, Rezko.
P.S. POW!!!!

As illustrated by today's attacks, the McCain campaign's regular hissy fits and downright nasty ads offer the Obama campaign a perfect opportunity to continually reintroduce the "hothead" frame.  They might consider responding with something like the following:

Today, when confronted with the fact that their candidate is so out of touch with regular Americans that he doesn't even know how many houses he owns, the McCain campaign flew off the handle yet again.  This time, they promised to smear Barack Obama with the kind of same sort of bogus, ad hominem attacks that they used to condemn.  They don't just attack countries without learning the facts first -- that's also how they attack their political opponents.  Since he has no plan to strengthen the middle class, John McCain relies on personal smears and wild accusations about Barack Obama.  If McCain runs his country the way he runs his campaign, you'll certainly be able to take him at his word when he says, "there will be more wars."

The Obama campaign's response to John McCain's negative campaigning shouldn't be disappointment ("He's an honorable man running an increasingly dishonorable campaign") or false outrage and indignation (that's the McCain campaign's job).  No, every McCain attack is another opportunity to hammer home the message that McCain is a hothead.  McCain shoots first and asks questions later -- he's a hothead who's frequently wrong, but never in doubt (and what other political figure does that remind you of...?)

There will be many issues that push themselves onto the front burner during the next 2.5 months.  It's the Obama campaign's job (and ours as well! Remember: we are the campaign) to ensure that the hothead frame stays a-cookin' at a steady boil on the back burner.

(crossposted at TPM)

Originally posted to north aufzoo on Thu Aug 21, 2008 at 03:25 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  tip jar, thanks kindly n/t (8+ / 0-)

    "Uh, we have a suspect, we have a witness, but we have no victim. See if you can authorize overtime."

    by north aufzoo on Thu Aug 21, 2008 at 03:28:11 PM PDT

  •  Time to rumble Baracky (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    dlh77489, loveendures

    I like a little rebellion now and then. It is like a storm in the atmosphere ~ Thomas Jefferson

    by valadon on Thu Aug 21, 2008 at 03:29:51 PM PDT

  •  AGE. Hit McBush on it. A lion long past his pri (0+ / 0-)

    me, lashing out at every thing.

    Or just a hot head?

    If they use Ayers (and they are thru a 'coordinated' uncoordinated 527) and Rezko (and they are), then McSame's age is now legitimate (if there was ever a question).

    And unlike Ayers, Rezko and Wright, McBush's age is completely legitimate and important.  

    McBush was born in 1936.  Actuarially, most men die before his age.  He had how many cancer surgery/scares?  He keeps forgetting thing... things anyone should know (how many houses?), even things he was just asked.  
    And his temper is bad and getting worse.

    Is it because he's just out-of-touch?
    Just hot-headed?


    You think he'll live thru even 1 term?  Just who is his VP choice?  

    That's 2 Rethug's possible Presidency to attack - in the same campaign.  And McBush has to defend both him and the VPs.

  •  They need to push every meme they can (0+ / 0-)
    it's called blitzkreig (if I spelled that right) people!

    "I, Barack Hussein Obama, do solemnly swear, that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States..."

    by dlh77489 on Thu Aug 21, 2008 at 03:57:19 PM PDT

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site