Skip to main content

NEADS Inc. is a non-profit that trains service dogs.  One of its current programs is called Canines for Combat Veterans.  The dogs can perform amazing feats, including untying someone's shoelaces and pulling off his shoes.  They can also help people walk by pulling them forward.  

NEADS has even figured out a way to have prison inmates train the dogs.  Both the psychological benefits and the after-release employment opportunities are easy to imagine, though the program is too young to have been formally evaluated.

Naturally, NEADS proposed that the Department of Veterans Affairs consider providing the animals to veterans who need them. However, NEADS neglected what seems to have been the key step: hiring a lobbyist with good Republican connections.  I'm sure Rick Davis could have done the job.  

Instead, the organization relied on facts, which have a well-known liberal bias, and got turned down cold based a steaming pile of pseudo-scientific crap.

My friend Lowry Heussler, who uses a service dog to compensate for a bad hip, is on the board of NEADS.  She produced one of the best f.u. letters it has ever been my privilege to read; full text is below.  If any actual journalist wants to report the story, I can make the contact.  In addition to a devastating literary style, Lowry has the sort of hyperactive New England conscience that guarantees that every semicolon of what she says is precisely accurate.

*****************
April 9, 2008

Michael J. Kussman, M.D.
James B. Peake, M.D.
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Washington, DC  20024  

Dear Drs. Kussman and Peake:

I have a copy of Dr. Kussman's memo (December 11, 2007) outlining the basis for his recommendations opposing VA funding for service dogs.  Dr. Peake approved the memo on January 14, 2008.

I urge you both to reconsider your position.  Although I have a wealth of data, both research-based and experiential, to refute each and every one of your findings, (paragraph 3) and will not include all of them here.  The most important points are these:

Your conclusion at ¶3 (a) comes dangerously close to scientific misrepresentation.  I have been informed that the study referred to was done by Dr. Rintala from Baylor Medical College.  It is not true that Dr. Rintala's work failed to substantiate effectiveness of service dogs; her sample was too small to support a general claim.  I am troubled that two physicians of your caliber would misuse scientific research to support a political position.

The assertion that cost savings of service dogs are offset by the cost of maintaining the dog is just plain silly.  In the field of logic, we call that a truism.  One might as well observe that the benefits of having health insurance are offset by the cost of an employee's contribution to the plan.  Honesty should have compelled you to include the economic data:  A part-time PCA (personal care assistant) costs $20,000 annually.  A service dog?  $1,200.

Your conclusion at ¶3 (c) is simply incorrect.  Putting aside the entire question of whether a "reacher" device is more effective than a service dog, there is no device that substitutes for a walker dog.  I have used canes, crutches and walkers.  None of them provide me with my dog's gentle forward traction that enables me to sail down the streets of Boston, untroubled by ice and snow, up hills and stairs, as I make my way to the courthouses where I do my job.

Paragraph 3 (d) is another truism.  Yes, the veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan will need as many as four dogs over their lifetimes.  We are willing to provide them.  Those of us who volunteer our time and donate private funds to service dog organizations have stepped up to meet the challenge.  What am I to conclude from the fact that my government, having sent young men and women to war, now uses misstatements of fact, including scientific fact, to justify a refusal to care for the wounded?

Paragraph 3 (e) is both factually incorrect (service dogs do not need constant retraining) and, if you'll forgive me for saying so, patently offensive to the disabled.  I am offended by the suggestion that disabled people are "too disabled" to effectively use service dogs.  Let us leave this unfortunate paragraph without further comment.

It is hardly a surprise that you find, in ¶3 (f), an absence of consistent standards for assessing the usefulness of a service dog for an individual.  You probably ignored the material available from Assistance Dog International and looked at the major insurance companies and the VA system.  Until this war resulted in a skyrocketing increase in the young disabled population, service dog organizations did their work without any third-party insurance reimbursement or government involvement.  Standards weren't needed.  So long as the VA turns its back on the needs of its veterans, the VA will never develop its own clinical standards.  

I wish to leave you with a consideration that may have not been apparent when you were creating this policy.  So long as the VA refuses to provide economic support that would enable reputable service dog charities to increase their production of trained dogs, a shadow industry in fake service dogs will flourish.  There are already hundreds of sleazy people promising to provide service dogs for a fee.  Most of these fly-by-night companies simply take money from the disabled person in return for a promise that the staff will provide training for the person's own dog.  The disabled person ends up with an untrained pet, an identification card "certifying" that the pet is a service dog within the meaning of the ADA, and some training materials.  Our veterans deserve better.

I have criticized the evidentiary basis for your conclusions, so let me end on a more positive note with a suggestion for improving your data.  On behalf of NEADS, Inc. and the Canines for Combat Veterans program, I extend an invitation to each of you to visit our campus in Massachusetts.  We have a wealth of information to share with you, and it could better inform your policies.

Very truly yours,

Lowry Heussler

Originally posted to Mark A R Kleiman on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 12:44 AM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Awesome... Put up a Tip Jar. (3+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    LNK, Rogneid, bushondrugs

    Hope this lasts until the daytime, when more folks can see and Recc it.

    It deserves the notice.

    Tell Lowry she rocks!

    Cheers!

    SophK

    Some men weave their sophistry till their own reason is entangled. ~Samuel Johnson

    by sophistry makes me tired on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 01:33:03 AM PDT

  •  Can't put you on the rec list (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Rogneid, bushondrugs

    But somebody should.

    "If another country builds a better car, we buy it. If they make a better wine, we drink it. If they have better healthcare . . . what's our problem? "

    by mbayrob on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 01:38:03 AM PDT

  •  Can someone recommend another site to post this? (4+ / 0-)

    This is important, and it's too likely to get lost in the clutter.

    "If another country builds a better car, we buy it. If they make a better wine, we drink it. If they have better healthcare . . . what's our problem? "

    by mbayrob on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 01:40:05 AM PDT

  •  Recommended and will tip (4+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    marina, LNK, kurt, bushondrugs

    Service dogs do incredible work.

    Add to the fine letter by Ms. Heussler the proven mental and physical health benefits of pet ownership.  Hereis a pretty good summary of some of the studies.  People with dogs and cats have been demonstrated to have lower blood pressure; lower blood cholesterol and triglycerides; higher survival rates after serious illness and better treatment compliance.

    They are less lonely, both because of the companionship of the animal and because a pet is a bridge to human interaction; less depressed even when seriously ill; have less stress as individuals and within their families.  (This brief survey of findings includes a link to the Delta Society's website, which has a large number of articles and abstracts about those studies and more.)

    Tell me again how we'd be saving money not providing service dogs to veterans who most likely are not only facing physical challenges, but PTSD, stress and depression?

    (By the way inmate dog-training programs are such a win-win-win.  Anyone else see the Animal Planet series "Cell Dogs", about just those kinds of programs, a couple of years ago?  You help the dog's eventual owner; you help the dog; and you put an inmate on an incredibly positive path--they need to earn the right to work these programs, and the work, and the relationship with the dogs, rewards them.)

  •  Email john at Balloonjuice.com, Nate on (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    mbayrob, bushondrugs

    fivethirtyfive.com;  try mydd; firedoglake.com;

    Give me permission to crosspost in the am.

    We are in a time where it is risky NOT to change. Barack Obama 7-30-08

    by samddobermann on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 02:05:51 AM PDT

  •  About disabled people. John McCain (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    marina, kurt

    I want to follow up researching what has that wounded warrior ever done for disabled Americans?

    See another awesome diary
    http://www.dailykos.com/...

    Outrage From A REAL Disabled Person
    by The Gimp

    Media Reform Action Link http://stopbigmedia.com/

    by LNK on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 02:10:22 AM PDT

  •  An array of solutions needed for our vets! (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    MKSinSA

    Service dogs aren't the only answer, but they are an important component in the healing and care for some veterans.  Service dogs should be provide to those veterans who could benefit from having one.

    The old one-size-fits-all approach in government ultimately treats our veterans as if they are widgets from a factory.  

    The fact that service dogs are not a global solution only means that we should stop expecting a global solution.  Different veterans have different needs.

    Impeachment is a duty, not an option that can be taken off the table.

    by bushondrugs on Mon Sep 15, 2008 at 02:30:09 AM PDT

  •  Tip jar (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    samddobermann

    Have at it!

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site