Skip to main content

Clear Republican Stu Rothenberg usually directs his snide, catty remarks at congressional Democrats. But seeing his clear preference, John McCain, wilt and flail under the pressure of the campaign, he reverts to a "damn them all" approach (unfortunately behind Roll Call's paywall):

I’m tired of the bizarre distortions and half-truths, and of the endless platitudes. McCain, the straight-talker, isn’t doing that anymore, and Obama is equally bad. Both are running blatantly misleading campaigns.

"Equally bad". Right... But that would've been standard boilerplate for that crank. This, on the ther hand, is new insight into his mind:

Voters shouldn’t judge a candidate by his skin color. Maybe, but is it any more unfair than, for example, saying that because McCain and President Bush are both Republicans that a McCain administration would produce a third Bush term? No, it isn’t.

Really? Being racist is no more unfair than saying that McCain, by agreeing with Bush on every major issue (demonstrably so), will just extend the Bush reign? An opinion based on demonstrable fact (that McCain and Bush differ on no major policy issues) is just as "unfair" as racism? Even if it wasn't true, it wouldn't be remotely similar.

Let me put it this way -- is being racist more unfair than McCain claiming that Obama wants to teach kindergartners about sex?

Yes, yes and yes. No policy-based political attack, no matter how untrue, is more unfair than judging someone solely by the color of their skin. Period. That Rothenberg doesn't grasp that says more about his own moral character, than about the current state of the race.

Originally posted to Daily Kos on Thu Sep 25, 2008 at 01:45 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site