Skip to main content

Toxic Assets. How toxic are these assets? How about a formula?

(Number of total home loans) x (Fraction of those loans prone to default)

And the formula for the fraction of the loans prone to default might have a breakdown. My first try at an underbaked one could be:

(Fraction of loans prone to default) =
(Fraction of defaults caused by predatory lending practices)
+ (Fraction of defaults caused by upside down property values)
+ (Fraction of defaults caused by financial hardships)

Since we're throwing some mad dollars around, here, why not throw them straight at the problem? The debtors.

Create a fund to which all homeowners in danger of defaulting on their mortgage payments to be able to borrow up to 20% of their house payment, once a month, for 24 months, interest free.

Only those who currently pay income taxes in the last 3 years and have a mortgage in default are eligible. Why? Because one way to get the money to you could be a combination of tax credit and tax holiday.

If you both have paid income taxes, and are sure you don't need the program, you get a tax credit for some arbitrary value of the interest, for the money you didn't need to use. The IRS should be directed to share information for those who want help with a fraction of their mortgage payment. This much can be pre-administered.

If you need help with more than 20% (or some other arbitrary percentage), you're in over your head and really are beyond help. If your problems are no larger than the arbitrary percentage, hopefully this will add up to enough relief to get you through the next two years, like the financial hardship unemployment insurance is there to help you through. Sorry if you can't quite squeak over the arbitrary line, but there's got to be a line somewhere, and preserving your neighbors' equity should help you indirectly at least. Another thing: Four years from now, you will either have to have had your mortgage renegotiated, your home sold off, or start to make payments back on principal.

I think allowing bankruptcy judges to renegotiate mortgage deals is a great idea, that will help matters immensely just by that law being on the books.

I think a significant liability should be assigned to the creators of the "liars' loans," not that it will be.

This will help detoxify the toxic assets, directly assist those with the default problem, and put the public money exactly where it belongs, around the institutions that should go under.  

Originally posted to kazoo of the north on Tue Sep 30, 2008 at 05:56 PM PDT.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  OF COURSE: Feel free to disagree (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:

    I thought of it like this:

    1. Start with an enrollment program that already identifies your home ownership status (income tax rolls)
    1. Focus on those at the source of the program
    1. Modify their income by not taking as much
    1. It doesn't have to work for everyone
  •  We could just pass a law cancelling the debts (1+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    kazoo of the north

    Sure, a lot of banks would see their paper assets (unrealizable anyway) vanish; but against that would be set a whole lot of homeowners whose disposable incomes would no longer be eaten up in interest payments.

    Money for the rich, or homes for the not-so-rich?

    •  Debts will be legally cancelled (0+ / 0-)

      That IS what is happening here, in a big or small, abstract or concrete way. Laws are now being passed to print up a lot of money to buy assets at prices nobody in their right mind would pay.

      Also: The Federal Reserve answers to no one. It already did print up 630 billion. It never needed Congress to go ahead and do it. It's just looking for cover to lend it out now. Too bad those spare rolls of toilet tissue in the bathroom may end up being worth more than the dollars.

      I think that attacking the problem by the widest margin, targeted at its very source, administered through a payroll holiday is the smallest thing that is possibly big enough to work. It could fix the problem at a grass roots level, and a payroll tax holiday should be popular on the right wing, and relief popular on the left.

      •  Payroll holiday (1+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        kazoo of the north

        or payroll tax holiday?

        A payroll holiday would be a very radical step. It would have to be accompanied by a general work holiday, too. Hooray for Oprah and the daytime tv industry.

        A payroll tax holiday would have to be accompanied by a corresponding holiday for benefit payouts for all unemployed workers, disabled workers, and isn't that where Social Security comes from?

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site